Has the blockade on unbelievers been lifted?

No, revocation should not be included in dishonesty, and then revocation is equivalent to error correction; The shielding is correct, but if there is a certain situation stipulated by law, it will be shielded and this will be recorded. If it is revoked, the people on the list will be removed from the list and will no longer be untrustworthy. If it is blocked, but the list can't be seen, but the people on the list are still untrustworthy.

First, the difference between blacklist blockade and revocation of dishonesty

1. Blocking means no one can find it.

2. Revocation is to cancel this black record.

3. There should be no shielding now, and the deletion will not be cancelled until the obligations are fulfilled.

Second, the court has indicated that it has blocked the list of untrustworthy people. How to find it online?

1 Maybe the relevant staff informed you that you can cancel the relevant records because you have met the corresponding conditions.

It may take three working days from this notice to the specific deletion of records. Please be patient.

3. If it is not deleted after three days, you can reapply. In addition, some institutions will capture court data and update it slowly. Please check with the authorities.

Third, after the court's breach of trust is blocked, can banks still lend?

1. After paying off the debt, those who meet the requirements can borrow from the bank.

2. Just bring the information to the bank for consultation.

3. All kinds of work certificates, income certificates, mortgages, loans, visas and employment.

Legal basis:

"Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court Municipality on Publishing the Information of the List of Persons Executed in Disbelief"

Article 1 If the person subjected to execution fails to fulfill the obligations specified in the effective legal documents, and under any of the following circumstances, the people's court shall include him in the list of people subjected to execution for breach of trust, and impose credit punishment on him according to law:

1, refusing to perform the obligations specified in the effective legal documents when it has the ability to perform;

2. Obstructing or resisting execution by forging evidence, violence or threats;

3. Evading execution by false litigation, false arbitration or concealing or transferring property;

4. Violating the property reporting system;

5. Violating the consumption restriction order;

6. Refusing to perform the settlement agreement without justifiable reasons.

Provisions of the Supreme People's Court Municipality on Restricting the High Consumption and Related Consumption of the Executed Person

Article 3 If the person subjected to execution is a natural person, he shall not engage in the following high-consumption and unnecessary consumption behaviors after taking measures to restrict consumption:

(a) when taking the means of transportation, choose the second class or above of the plane, train soft sleeper and ship;

(two) high consumption in hotels, hotels, nightclubs, golf courses and other places above the star level;

(three) the purchase of real estate or new construction, expansion, high-grade decoration of housing;

(four) leasing high-grade office buildings, hotels, apartments and other places to work;

(5) Purchasing non-essential vehicles;

(6) tourism and vacation;

(seven) children attending private schools with high fees;

(8) Paying high premiums to purchase insurance wealth management products;

(9) Non-essential consumption behaviors such as taking all seats of G-prefix EMU trains and first-class and above seats of other EMU trains.