Some people think that Shen Lun wrote essays and comments, with sharp language and quotations. In fact, this understanding of Shen Lun is very wrong and harmful.
The original intention of Shen Lun is "Shen Lun". "Trial" can be understood as expression, defense and affirmation, while "theory" is discussion, argumentation and argumentation. Theology is obviously different from other theories. It is not a grandiose theory that chooses materials according to subjective likes and dislikes and makes full use of its personality, but requires accurate grasp of some objective facts, necessary explanation and expression, and then on this basis. It is completely different from argumentative essays or essays widely used in social communication. According to my understanding, Shen Lun, as an exam-oriented style devoted to the selection and appointment of national civil servants, appropriately draws lessons from some experiences and practices of "strategy" in China's ancient imperial examinations. The strategy mainly requires candidates to demonstrate the feasibility and rationality of a national policy or countermeasure, focusing on the ability of candidates to solve problems. In this respect, application is consistent with strategy theory. Modern applied theory focuses on expounding views on the problems raised by cases and materials, exploring reasons, reasonably inferring the logical relationship between materials, clarifying problems and proposing solutions. Judging from the provisions of the examination syllabus and the real questions over the years, the application examination provides candidates with a series of written materials reflecting specific practical problems. Candidates are required to read these materials carefully, summarize the main problems reflected by them, and put forward practical solutions to this problem. Finally, they will elaborate and demonstrate their views in detail. When writing an application, we should pay attention to avoiding the factors of "discussion" over "application" in the paper, and highlight the ability to analyze and solve problems, instead of writing radical views and proposing unrealistic measures when answering questions.
In addition, those argumentative essays with gorgeous words, sharp language, quotations and quotations are not what ordinary people can do. /kloc-the examination time of 0/50 minutes will not exceed 40 minutes, so it is not easy for ordinary people to write an atmospheric argumentative paper in such a short time. This can be explained by the theory of "two languages" in literature and art. We usually think that everyone's first language is the language that describes their inner intuitive feelings, and the second language is the language that expresses their feelings externally. Everyone has a first language, but a second language is related to human talent and is the patent of writers and artists. Therefore, it is impossible for ordinary people to write a magnificent argumentative paper in a very short time. In addition, it is easy to write flashy, frivolous and violent argumentative essays. Emphasis on style. Also, writing a composition is not easy to control the boundaries of discussion, and it is easy to make people feel that candidates are extreme and full of complaints, thus affecting the test scores.
In order to understand the difference between prose and essay more emotionally, we might as well compare the following two articles:
Number one: Why are tigers so popular?
Thought masters have long worried that human beings will enter the "nothingness era", everything will become relative, and there is no absolute boundary between true and false. Scholars are too professional to be understood; Cybercrime records are too heavy to be believed; The official speech seems to involve financial interests, and ordinary people dare not talk nonsense. In fact, as long as an organization has the prestige to make the final decision in the melee, things will not develop to this point.
……
For example, online games allow players to unload their identities and live an alternative life in the virtual world; For example, idol drama, which is obviously made up, makes the audience laugh and cry. Can you say that the emotional experience they caused is false? Not only the South China Tiger, but also the boundary between true and false in life is becoming more and more blurred. From dressing to aesthetic tendency, contemporary people are all in the consumption symbols that echo the wishes of others, and it is already difficult to distinguish which ones are really wanted and which ones are invisibly loaded by advertisements, public opinion and society. Following the social trend, the collective unconscious choice has influenced the judgment of public opinion. The truth itself is true or false, but its weight has become blurred. Coupled with the fine social division of labor, everyone is confined to a small part of the assembly line, and it is really difficult to get a glimpse of the complex panorama. It is impossible to judge who is right when the authorities of all parties come to diametrically opposite conclusions. Therefore, thinkers have long worried that human beings will enter the "nothingness era" and everything will become relatively true and false. Scholars are too professional to be understood; Cybercrime records are too heavy to be believed; The official speech seems to involve financial interests, and people dare not talk nonsense. In fact, in the melee, as long as one institution has the prestige to make the final decision, things will not develop to such a point. Unfortunately, in a pluralistic society, no one refuses to accept anyone, and no one believes anyone. As a result, in the bubble of public opinion, virtual fire is getting more and more prosperous.
To say the least, the debate in the field of public affairs has never been afraid of bubbles or lies, because everyone believes that the truth is becoming clearer and clearer. Previously, such as Sun Zhigang's incident, it promoted the abolition of the Regulations on Detention and Repatriation, and labor disputes prompted the revision of the Labor Contract Law. Even if the measures are not in place, some people's livelihood hotspots will also drive the governance of the whole society. So what are the benefits of the storm set off by the South China Tiger to society? Perhaps, it is really just a reflection of the nothingness of contemporary society, and it is a negative reminder. In the contemporary society where technology is changing with each passing day, media is developed and information is surrounded, people may be blinded and trapped by complicated advantages. When simple facts cannot be restored, the absurd future of the matrix is not far away from people.
Article 2: the perfection of China's information disclosure system from the tiger photo incident in South China
On February 3, 2008, the Shaanxi Provincial People's Government issued a notice on the violation of the government press release system by the Provincial Forestry Department in response to the photos of the South China Tiger concerned by the media and the public. On February 4th, Shaanxi Provincial Forestry Department sincerely accepted the criticism of the provincial government and made an apology letter to the public.
In the letter of apology, the Shaanxi Provincial Forestry Department claimed that it violated the relevant provisions of the Regulations on the Openness of Government Information in Shaanxi Province and the Opinions of the General Office of the Shaanxi Provincial People's Government on Establishing a Government Press Release System, but said nothing about the punishment of the responsible person.
In my opinion, it is difficult for the public to know the punishment for those responsible. One of the important reasons is that it is difficult to find the relevant punishment provisions in the Regulations of Shaanxi Provincial Government Information Disclosure and the Opinions of the General Office of Shaanxi Provincial People's Government on Establishing the Government Press Release System. "Shaanxi Provincial Government Information Disclosure Regulations" points out that in any of the following circumstances, the competent authority shall order it to make corrections; If the circumstances are serious, the supervisory organ or the competent authority shall impose administrative sanctions on the directly responsible person in charge and other directly responsible personnel: failing to perform the obligation of voluntary disclosure or not updating the contents of voluntary disclosure in time; Failing to provide or update the government information catalogue of this organ in time; Concealing government information belonging to the public scope from the applicant or refusing to provide it for other reasons; Charging fees in violation of regulations; Other acts in violation of these regulations.
If we compare this provision, it is difficult to see which of the five cases has been violated, neither failing to fulfill the obligation of voluntary disclosure, nor concealing or refusing to provide it for other reasons, nor charging in violation of the provisions. Because of this, some relevant personnel can even announce the discovery of the South China Tiger without physical evidence. Even in many doubts, there are still some people who unscrupulously support that the South China Tiger is real.
This situation cannot but reflect that there are some loopholes in China's information disclosure system. Looking at China's information disclosure system, we can easily find that its biggest focus lies in how to disclose it in time. Many laws and regulations stipulate relevant penalties for those responsible for not disclosing or concealing in time, but rarely stipulate how to punish those who practice fraud.
Information disclosure has two basic meanings, one is timely disclosure, and the other is that the public information cannot be false. But in practice, we only pay attention to the former and ignore the latter. It is precisely because the latter has no relevant system to restrain it that the South China Tiger incident can happen. In fact, the South China Tiger incident is not the only similar case. For example, in order to defraud more funds, some places wantonly expand disaster losses. The South China Tiger incident has sounded the alarm for us.
The author believes that it is difficult to prevent the next South China Tiger incident without relevant institutional constraints, because there may be many economic benefits behind the falsehood and non-compliance procedures. As far as the South China Tiger incident is concerned, if the South China Tiger really exists in SaBine County, it may be natural to establish a nature reserve. With the capital investment of the central government, it is natural to attract more tourists.
The South China Tiger incident may be an accident, but we should also see that once the false public information overflows, or the information is not disclosed according to relevant procedures, it will not only affect the image of the government and reduce its credibility, but also affect the correct decision-making of government departments in emergencies, causing unnecessary losses. Therefore, in order to maintain the transparent government construction vigorously promoted by the central government, it is necessary to stop this kind of behavior of publishing false public information, and the central and local governments at all levels should increase the punishment for such behavior in relevant laws and regulations.
Both articles are comments on the photo incident of the South China Tiger. Obviously, there are obvious differences between the two articles in language, viewpoint and logic. The first essay is a typical essay comment, with sharp and interesting language and scattered structure, with the emphasis on "nothingness". The second article is a relatively standard essay, with plain and steady language and rigorous structure. According to the logic of asking questions, analyzing problems and solving problems, this paper explores the layout of the article through the photo incident of South China Tiger.