The man is "coaxing his mother-in-law", and the wedding room only accounts for 1%! Does this prenuptial agreement have legal effect?

This prenuptial agreement has legal effect because it was signed by both parties. Seeing such a news, a man divorced a house of more than 3 million and only got 28 thousand. I was particularly puzzled at first. Did the man go off the rails or do something wrong, which led to the court's decision? After knowing what happened, I found that this man was neither cheating nor domestic violence. What happened? Let's see what happened first.

First, the beginning of things.

In 2020, a couple, Xiao Li and A Qiang, filed for divorce. However, at the time of divorce, A Qiang only got more than 28,000 yuan for a house with a market value of 3.3 million yuan. It turned out that the house was worth 6.5438+0.7 million yuan at that time, of which Xiaoli's mother invested 6.5438+0.00 million yuan to buy the house for both of them as a down payment, and the remaining 700,000 yuan was repaid by both husband and wife. Before marriage, A Qiang signed such a prenuptial agreement in order to coax her mother-in-law. She agreed when she registered the property right? According to a * * *? While Xiaoli accounts for 99%, and A Qiang only accounts for 1%. After that, their marriage changed, and this premarital property became the biggest obstacle to their property division.

Second, how did the court decide this matter?

Because of the divorce, the husband and wife also went to court. The first trial held that A Qiang only divided the house by 1%, which was seriously inconsistent with its contribution to the house. Xiaoli should pay A Qiang 500,000 yuan for house purchase. However, Xiaoli refused to accept that the down payment of the house was given by her mother, and the provident fund loan was not given much. The real estate license clearly stated 1% share. Xiaoli refused to accept it, so she appealed. The second trial ruled that Xiaoli paid A Qiang more than 28,000 yuan for the house purchase, and the remaining loan was returned by Xiaoli. It seems that A Qiang is the victim of the whole thing, but let's think about how much he has paid for this house.

Moreover, the prenuptial agreement was not signed by others, but promised by himself. Now that he is divorced, he wants to go back on his word. This man really has no responsibility at all. It turns out that this house was written by his mother-in-law. Although he and his wife returned the money together, they didn't. Can't they be generous after the divorce? Leave the house to the wife.

Third, what men say must be fulfilled.

Obviously, A Qiang went back on his word later, and obviously, A Qiang also went back on his word later. You didn't get so little money, which shows that you are unwilling, but who can blame if you say it yourself? Think about the consequences before you speak. If you can't, don't talk nonsense.