First, the nature of the detection mechanism itself. If a testing organization not only does vehicle testing and identification, but also does vehicle trading and sells used cars, it is not a real third-party vehicle testing organization. The car inspection report he issued also lacked objectivity. Such a report may be issued by packaging the vehicles sold by itself, which has a certain amount of moisture. Therefore, the real third-party vehicle inspection agency can only do inspection, appraisal and evaluation business, but can't participate in the vehicle transaction and can't profit from the transaction.
Second, detect the attributes of institutional personnel. At present, there are many testing institutions in the market, a large part of which are unable to support a large number of professional full-time used car testing appraisers because of their business norms. Therefore, they will adopt a part-time mode, euphemistically called the partnership system, in fact, they do so on purpose to reduce their responsibilities. Such testing institutions cannot form unified management, unified training, unified service and unified standards for part-time testing personnel. Correspondingly, there will be mixed situations among their inspectors, some are car dealers or individual car dealers, some are car washers in car wash shops who earn extra money, and some are repairmen in repair shops. In short, these people are not professionals, and it is impossible to carry out systematic, standardized and streamlined inspection and identification of vehicles. Everyone's inspection is their own way, and even many people make inspection standards, inspection basis, and the definition of national accident vehicles. When you meet a car dealer, you all say with a smile, so you should be cautious about such testing institutions.
Third, the commitment of the testing organization to the testing results. Testing institutions are commercial enterprises, and the testing services they provide are also commercial services. Because providing services requires a commitment to their own services, many testing institutions are afraid to make a commitment to their own testing results because they are aware of the probability and risk of detection errors. The real testing organization dares to be responsible for its own testing results. For example, if the user entrusts the inspection, but a car light is not detected during the inspection, and the user finds that it is necessary to go to the 4S shop to replace the car light after buying the car, then the user can claim compensation from the inspection agency with the replacement invoice of the 4S shop. For example, there are extremely serious mistakes in the process of car inspection, such as accident car, soaking car and burning car, but the user bought the car based on the results of car inspection, so how much did the user buy? In this way, users can avoid losses to the maximum extent.
Fourth, whether there is an insurance company to underwrite. Professional testing institutions have their own standard testing procedures and corresponding rules and regulations. Every testing organization is certified. Such professional testing institutions generally have insurance companies to underwrite their testing. Once there is a major detection error, they can find the corresponding insurance company to make claims, so users of such testing institutions can also buy with confidence. On the other hand, if the testing institutions are not formal, it is impossible for insurance companies to underwrite them.
So to sum up, the testing organization depends on whether it is a truly neutral third party, the attributes of the testing personnel, the commitment to the testing results, and whether there is an insurance company behind it. With the above four points, it belongs to a more reliable testing institution.