Give full play to the social hearing role of experts and scholars in consulting research institutions in the decision-making process, and what level should be improved?

Give full play to the social hearing role of experts and scholars in consulting research institutions in the decision-making process, and improve the level of scientific decision-making, democratic decision-making and decision-making according to law. ?

To improve the inner-party democratic decision-making mechanism, it is mainly to do a good job of forward-looking and countermeasure research on major issues, listen to the opinions and suggestions of party member, the masses and grassroots cadres, give play to the role of consulting and research institutions, experts and scholars and social hearings in the decision-making process, and improve the scientific, democratic and legal level of decision-making.

Democratic decision support system:

First, establish a high-level workforce to serve decision-making.

Party and government organs may, according to needs, appropriately equip high-level think tanks or advisory committees in the fields of economy, science and technology, finance, law, urban construction and management, and may also hire a group of outstanding entrepreneurs to participate in decision-making consultation.

Second, improve the decision information support system.

Accurate and comprehensive information is the basis of correct decision. Information asymmetry is a prominent problem that affects decision-making. With the rapid development of economy and technology, information plays an increasingly important role in decision-making. We should make full use of modern information technology and means to collect, sort out and process data to provide objective, true and comprehensive information for decision-making.