Is it necessary to levy property tax in Wenzhou?

Recently, news that Guangzhou and Shenzhen are expected to be shortlisted for a new batch of pilot cities for real estate tax has continued. In this regard, many industry experts believe that levying property tax is the "ultimate weapon" for real estate regulation. So what do you think of this? Do you think it is necessary to levy property tax in Wenzhou? If levied, what impact will it have on Wenzhou property market? Netizen Horizon: Judging from the situation of the first batch of cities that levied property tax last year, the effect is not very obvious, which is reflected in the limited scope of influence and limited collection. Therefore, the property tax has little effect on the regulation of the property market. Netizen pineapple bag: Shanghai and Chongqing, two pilot cities, are very conservative in the collection method and tax rate formulation, so they have little effect. I think the tax rate for multi-suite holders should be raised. The more houses there are, the higher the tax rate will be, and the vacant houses will be reduced. The pacifier of netizens' happiness: Wenzhou's high housing prices have attracted national attention. It is also a pilot city for financial reform and one of the first 40 cities with personal housing information networking. Environment, technology and other conditions are available, so it is necessary to levy property tax. Reader Ai Ziyou: Collect early! It is best to levy a high proportion of tax on the second suite, so that people with multiple suites or high-end houses can't afford it, so that fewer people may speculate on the property market and the property market structure will be more reasonable. Netizen MiG: Property tax is calculated according to the taxable residual value or rental income of the house, which has certain operability and cannot obviously reflect the policy effect. In fact, many foreign cities have successful experience in this respect, which is worth learning. Reader Caicai Jr.: housing vacancy rate in Wenzhou is too high. Many residential quarters have been delivered for several years, and the occupancy rate is still below half. This is the "curse" laid by the prevalence of real estate speculation in previous years. If the regulation effect is lasting and the property market is developing more rationally, it is imperative to levy property tax. Reader A Sheng: While restraining real estate speculation and price increase, property tax will also invisibly increase the price including tax and increase the cost of buying a house and living. Its specific collection plan should protect first-time buyers and self-occupied groups. Netizens stayed up all night: the restrictions on purchases and loans have been limited for more than a year, and the regulation has finally received some results. However, after all, these administrative interventions are temporary and cannot be sustained for a long time. In order to make the property market develop steadily for a long time, it is necessary to "help out" the property tax. Netizen Xia Xing: Actually, the property tax is only a "small tax", and the "psychological impact" on the buyers is greater than the actual impact. If we want to regulate the property market, we need to regulate it from finance, land, supply and demand, taxation, affordable housing and other aspects. Bing Bing compiled "Changli Baitai Kuaiyi Real Estate Jianghu". Wei Yan Bo Yu's next topic: Should the regulation of the property market be loosened for improved demand?