Someone asked, what should I do if I don't reply to the leadership information in time and delay my work?
You're confusing a concept. "Second reply" does not mean "timely reply".
Some people think that it is a timely reply when the leader sends you a message, but it is not the case at all.
In the case of no undue delay, a reply after fully understanding the information is a timely reply, which is not necessarily an answer or "receipt" like completing the task.
Your reply can be: received+I will finish it as soon as possible; Or: accept+I will give you the plan around xx.
If you don't fully understand the information, you can ponder it over several times and reply: Yes, but I still don't understand xxx.
Timely reply is a timely and effective reply, not a quick and useless reply.
(2) Different emphases and different reaction times.
Reply to the leader's information according to the priority.
For example, in urgent tasks at work, we should speed up our response and give more feedback, because we need to ask for instructions from leaders in time to prevent mistakes and omissions. This is responsible for the leadership and for our own work.
If leading colleagues gossip in the group, you don't need to get involved every time, otherwise it will inevitably make people feel that you have nothing to do.
Therefore, the more important and relevant things are, the more we should start in time. We can talk about unimportant things in our spare time, or even not reply.