Known as the "last bastion" of the planned economy, the railway system has finally taken a big step in reform. According to the plan of institutional reform and functional transformation in the State Council announced yesterday, China will separate railway enterprises from enterprises, and set up the National Railway Administration and China Railway Corporation. In the future, the administrative responsibility for railway development planning and supervision will be entrusted to the Ministry of Transport and its subordinate State Railway Administration, and the main responsibility for safe transportation production will be borne by China Railway Corporation. This means that the Ministry of Railways will become a historical term from now on, and the name of "Iron Boss" will come to an end.
It is the will of the people to abolish the Ministry of Railways and realize the separation of government and enterprise. For decades, the railway system has always existed in a planned economy with the integration of government and enterprises, and has relatively independent judicial, educational and medical systems. In 200 1 year, China launched a large-scale monopoly industry reform aimed at breaking monopoly and introducing competition. As a result, electric power, civil aviation and telecommunications have successively introduced reform plans. Only the railway system "stands still" on the grounds that the railway needs a lot of investment, and the industry should not be too dispersed because of the system reform, which will affect the coordination problem and ultimately the transportation safety.
Facts have proved that the reason why the Ministry of Railways does not reform is untenable. Although railway construction has made great progress in recent years, the rapid development of high-speed rail in recent years is even more obvious, but the disadvantages brought by the backward system are increasingly criticized-it is difficult to solve the problem of grabbing tickets in Spring Festival travel rush, and insiders collude with scalpers to sell tickets every year; The Ministry of Railways issued a new regulation on 20 10, stipulating that the ticket must be changed before driving. As a result, the passengers were late, only the tickets were invalid, but the train was late without any compensation ... inefficient management, poor service awareness and endless overlord clauses made the name "Iron Boss" sound. The tragic scene of the Wenzhou bullet train accident and the corruption cases of senior officials of the Ministry of Railways, such as * * *, make the reasons for railway reform seem absurd, exposing the systematic and highly monopolized railway system to the point where it has to be reformed.
Now the railway system has finally implemented the separation of government from enterprise, which is a great progress in railway reform. Then, after the separation of government and enterprise, can the railway system get rid of the old drawbacks, introduce a sense of competition, truly take consumers as God, and let passengers enjoy cheap railway services? Can the difficulty of purchasing tickets be effectively alleviated? Can railway laws and regulations be restricted by public opinion? Can railway travel safety be more secure? These are probably the most concerned issues for the public.
Why should the Ministry of Railways be abolished?
Known as the "last bastion" of the planned economy, the railway system has finally taken a big step in reform. According to the plan of institutional reform and functional transformation in the State Council announced yesterday, China will separate railway enterprises from enterprises, and set up the National Railway Administration and China Railway Corporation. In the future, the administrative responsibility for railway development planning and supervision will be entrusted to the Ministry of Transport and its subordinate State Railway Administration, and the main responsibility for safe transportation production will be borne by China Railway Corporation. This means that the Ministry of Railways will become a historical term from now on, and the name of "Iron Boss" will come to an end.
It is the will of the people to abolish the Ministry of Railways and realize the separation of government and enterprise. For decades, the railway administration has always existed in a planned economy with the integration of government and enterprise, and has a relatively independent judicial, educational and medical system. In 200 1 year, China launched a large-scale monopoly industry reform aimed at breaking monopoly and introducing competition. As a result, electric power, civil aviation and telecommunications have successively introduced reform plans. Only the railway system "stands still" on the grounds that the railway needs a lot of investment, and the industry should not be too dispersed because of the system reform, which will affect the coordination problem and ultimately the transportation safety.
Facts have proved that the reason why the Ministry of Railways does not reform is untenable. Although railway construction has made great progress in recent years, the rapid development of high-speed rail in recent years is even more obvious, but the disadvantages brought by the backward system are increasingly criticized-it is difficult to solve the problem of grabbing tickets in Spring Festival travel rush, and insiders collude with scalpers to sell tickets every year; The Ministry of Railways issued a new regulation on 20 10, stipulating that the ticket must be changed before driving. As a result, the passengers were late, only the tickets were invalid, but the train was late without any compensation ... inefficient management, poor service awareness and endless overlord clauses made the name "Iron Boss" sound. The tragic scene of the Wenzhou bullet train accident and the corruption cases of senior officials of the Ministry of Railways, such as * * *, make the reasons for railway reform seem absurd, exposing the systematic and highly monopolized railway system to the point where it has to be reformed.
Now the railway system has finally implemented the separation of government from enterprise, which is a great progress in railway reform. Then, after the separation of government and enterprise, can the railway system get rid of the old drawbacks, introduce a sense of competition, truly take consumers as God, and let passengers enjoy cheap railway services? Can the difficulty of purchasing tickets be effectively alleviated? Can railway laws and regulations be restricted by public opinion? Can railway travel safety be more secure? These are probably the most concerned issues for the public.
Why was the Ministry of Railways revoked? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
It should be changed as soon as possible. It's just a bad habit, which is incomparable to highway, water transport, aviation and pipeline transportation. Advantages: Sichuan has a developed economy, and a few people are influenced by their parents or people around them. At present, the Ministry of Railways is equivalent to a debt of more than one million per employee. If yes, advantages: Yunnan can pick it up. First of all, it depends on whether you are going in the direction of military scientific research or operational command. It's hard to say, and there is a big difference. Or other public places. Formed this habit. There is no additional damage. Railway transportation has the advantages of high safety, fast transportation speed, long transportation distance, large transportation capacity and low transportation cost. There are no additional benefits. What is the essence of railway? Who manages it? Is it business or something? What are the benefits? What are the disadvantages? The State Council has the Ministry of Railways, and some fares will go up, mainly due to the redistribution of power by the upper level. And I still tore my stomach open and squandered it.
Does it make sense to abolish the Ministry of Railways?
Why should the Ministry of Railways be abolished? If you ask this question again now, some people may feel naive and meaningless. However, as a prospective passenger who will take the train many times in the future, I still want to find out some reasons. Judging from the information released by the media, the significance of abolishing the Ministry of Railways can be summarized in two aspects: first, reducing state administrative agencies, simplifying administration and decentralizing power; Second, it is conducive to separating government from enterprises and opening up the railway market. Then, let's analyze in detail whether there are some paradoxes. The establishment of state administrative agencies should be based on the needs of social management and have certain functions. The number of administrative institutions does not explain whether the establishment of institutions is reasonable, necessary, reasonable, redundant or not. Therefore, it is absurd to measure the effectiveness of the reform by reducing the number of state administrative agencies. Similarly, there is no necessary relationship between decentralization and institutional setup. If there is no function after decentralization, natural institutions will be removed. But for departments that still have functions, can't they be decentralized without the abolition of institutions? In particular, many institutional reforms have not really been streamlined, and some have only changed their brands, or changed their affiliation, or increased some reform costs as before. For a long time, the Ministry of Railways has been playing the role of operator and public goods provider, which means that the railway system has the dual nature of operation and public welfare. According to the principle of market economy now, the elements belonging to management should be separated from administrative management and independent economic accounting should be carried out, that is, the separation of government from enterprises, which is understandable by most people. The question now is, if the Ministry of Railways is not abolished, will it be impossible to separate government from enterprises and open the railway market? In the case of the existence of the Ministry of Railways, if the superior makes the decision and deployment of separating government from enterprises and opening up the railway market, will the Ministry of Railways dare not implement it? If there is such a worry, then the problem should not be the Ministry of Railways. Over the years, it can't be said that the Ministry of Railways has not carried out any reform, but it has taken some actions in implementing enterprise management and introducing private capital. However, it is basically limited to regional or formal changes, and has not fundamentally broken through the old model of rigid thinking and aging management, and has not yet established a management system that meets the requirements of market economy and national conditions. There are many problems to be solved urgently in transportation management and service, and the voice of the society is very high, especially in the railway system where serious corruption frequently occurs. But can the Ministry of Railways bear all these drawbacks and problems? Where is the leadership, guidance and supervision of the Ministry of Railways? Does the Ministry of Railways do whatever it wants? At present, due to the rapid development of national economic construction, especially the imbalance of regional economic development, there is a great demand for railway transportation. In such a specific historical period, the state has the obligation to provide people with fast, safe and economical means of transportation. Otherwise, anything to raise people's income and build a well-off society will become empty talk. Moreover, since our socialist market economic system is still being gradually established and improved, it may be counterproductive to completely push the railway to the market now. In addition, the particularity of the railway transportation industry determines that there must be a strong unified and coordinated management, otherwise, the normal operation order and the safety of people's lives and property will not be guaranteed and will cause endless harm. Finally, the Ministry of Railways was abolished in the name of reform, and the railway system named as the "last fortress" of planned economy is about to embark on the broad road of market economy. The last minister said "happily" at the scene of the two sessions, "The average railway fare is low, and the fare should be determined according to market rules and enterprise management in the future." Looking forward to the stars and the moon, the first major "benefit" brought to the people by the reform of the Ministry of Railways is the price increase of train tickets? As a result, there are some doubts in people's hearts. Will it be easier to buy train tickets in the future than before Will the service quality of railway staff be improved? How much is a small train ticket? I really don't know whether the reform of the Ministry of Railways will let the people down again.
What are the benefits of the cancellation of the Ministry of Railways for our tourists?
China Railway has more than 4 trillion assets, including only the central assets and excluding the assets of local branches. It is estimated that local assets are equivalent to central assets, and there are also more than 4 trillion. Market prices have risen by at least 20%~50% respectively. I estimate that the total assets of China Railway are at least 654.38 trillion yuan, and the medium and long-term market value is much higher than this.
The financial report of the Ministry of Railways as of the third quarter of 20 12 shows that the total assets of the Ministry of Railways are 4,304.4 billion yuan, the total liabilities are 2,660.7 billion yuan, and the asset-liability ratio is 6 1.8 1%. From the perspective of corporate finance, the debt ratio of an operating entity is within the normal range of 70%~80%. For China Railway Corporation, the debt ratio is completely under control, so don't worry.
China high-speed railway is the biggest highlight of China's economic development in the past 10 years. If China Aerospace is the first symbol of China's leap-forward development, then high-speed rail can be called the second symbol. China seized the commanding heights of the ultra-modern industry that the United States dreamed of, which made Americans feel very uncomfortable.
China's high-speed railway is the advantage of China's railway development, and there is still room for improvement if the core technology of high-speed railway is completely localized. The advantage of China's high-speed rail lies not in the major breakthrough of technological independence, but in the explosive force of industrialization. At that time, all the railway investment frenzy in the world was unparalleled.
China high-speed rail has become the commanding height of the biggest game between technology, economy and industrial safety in the contemporary world. High-speed rail is a real modern high-tech comprehensive national economy industry, but its real value is obscured by the virtual economy in modern America and Europe.
Global basic navigation is shipping; Air transport is a high-value and time-sensitive circulation; The national day and night traffic network of a big country is a railway, and the high-speed rail has become a plane on the ground because of its speed advantage, and it is a super-large plane. The high-speed railway network has a huge competitive advantage.
The related pull of high-speed railway, from supply to demand, is omni-directional, open and radial, which not only becomes the most fundamental network guarantee for domestic big markets, but also ensures the rapid circulation of intercontinental and even world big markets.
High-speed rail will become the core cornerstone and main backbone of global infrastructure in the future, which is doomed to all competition between China and foreign countries in this field. China must firmly grasp the initiative, ensure the completion of high-speed rail and large railway network with the national system, and form an international comparative advantage and an international absolute advantage.
The overall improvement of the advantages of high-speed rail and the leap-forward refinement and supplement of the traditional railway network should become the economic growth pole of China in the next 20 years. This will probably form a linkage amplification effect with urbanization and industrial informatization.
China must not abandon his martial arts. When he needed to make great strides, he was fooled by international capital to jointly short and spoil China's advantageous industries and high-quality assets.
In the structural design of railway reform, it is nothing more than a circuitous tactic to boil frogs in warm water if it is thought that * * * can be guaranteed to hold shares and the state-owned economy is dominant. Once the platform of railway property rights is released, the future of China railway may completely reproduce the tragedy of the railway protection movement in modern China, that is, it will basically fall into the tragic situation of international capital strangulation.
When was the Ministry of Railways of China abolished?
At 7 o'clock in the morning of March 20 13 17, the sign of "China Railway Corporation" at Fuxing Road 10, West Chang 'an Street in Beijing was quietly changed, and the plaque of the former Ministry of Railways was removed. Sina Real Name Certification of China Railway Corporation Weibo "China Railway" released the listing news that morning. At the same time, the official Weibo of "China Railway" was changed from V certification to "China Railway Corporation". It is understood that the 64-year-old brand of "China People and Ministry of Railways" will be sent to China Railway Museum.
What is the name of the Ministry of Railways after its revocation?
China dielu company
The plan proposes that the administrative responsibility of the Ministry of Railways for formulating railway development plans and policies should be assigned to the Ministry of Transport. The Ministry of Transport coordinated the development of railways, highways, waterways and civil aviation, and accelerated the construction of an integrated transportation system. The establishment of the National Railway Bureau, managed by the Ministry of Transport, undertakes other administrative duties of the Ministry of Railways, is responsible for drafting railway technical standards, and supervising and managing railway safety production, transportation service quality and railway engineering quality. China Railway Corporation shall be established to undertake the responsibilities of enterprises of the Ministry of Railways, be responsible for unified dispatching and command of railway transportation, operate railway passenger and freight transportation business, undertake special transportation and special transportation tasks, be responsible for railway construction, and assume the main responsibility of railway safety production. At the same time, the Ministry of Railways will no longer be retained.
Adoption! ! ! ! ! ! !
When was the Ministry of Railways abolished?
It wasn't cancelled last year, it was downgraded.
How to reform after the Ministry of Railways cancels the railway police?
The information related to the cancellation of railway police reform by the Ministry of Railways is as follows:
(a) to cancel the organizational system of railway police.
(2) railway police organs are transformed into security departments of railway transport enterprises or set up special railway transport security companies.
(three) railway police organs according to the region under the local * * *, into the sequence of local public security organs.
(four) railway police organs into the national civil service sequence.
In the railway reform, the ownership of railway police has not been directly documented. We can only make a rough guess from the following aspects, and the actual destination should be subject to the documents.
On March 10, the State Council's institutional reform and functional transformation plan was announced and submitted to the First Session of the 12th National People's Congress for deliberation. In this scheme, the railway police have no clear ownership. The Public Security Bureau of the Ministry of Railways is not under the management of the Ministry of Public Security, nor is it under the management of the Ministry of Transport or the State Railway Administration. The ownership of the railway police has become a mystery. Since then, the above-mentioned railway police system people have browsed information on the Internet as soon as they have time, but so far they have not seen the direction where railway police belongs.
According to the division of functions before the reform, the Ministry of Railways Public Security Bureau is under the dual leadership of the Ministry of Railways and the Ministry of Public Security, in which the party and government work is led by the Ministry of Railways and the public security work is led by the Ministry of Public Security.
One solution is that the Ministry of Public Security directly manages the "big traffic" public security system.
In the past, the leadership and management system of railway police organs, like other traffic public security organs, was always directly led and managed by the Ministry of Railways and the Ministry of Transport, while the Ministry of Public Security only provided operational guidance. The police under the leadership of industry departments often act as departmental security guards, with more non-police activities, and the police force is even regarded as labor force. In particular, it is impossible to form authoritative law enforcement supervision in the industry, which is very unfavorable to the normalization, modernization and legalization of traffic public security organs, and it is also far from the requirements of modern judicial system.
According to the requirements of the judicial system reform, public security organs in railway and other industries should break away from the original leadership of industry departments and return to the system of direct leadership and management of the Ministry of Public Security, which is more in line with the concept of building a China ruled by law and a safe China. Therefore, we should take this leadership system reform in railway police as an opportunity to return railway police, Transport Public Security Bureau, Civil Aviation Public Security Bureau and other transport public security institutions to the direct leadership and management of the Ministry of Public Security (transforming the Tenth Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security into an internal business bureau). At the same time, we should set up a police liaison department in the Ministry of Transport, send resident liaison coordinators, and establish a new police liaison guarantee mechanism.
Another plan is to integrate the transportation public security system into the "big traffic" transportation system and set up the Public Security Bureau of the Ministry of Transport.
If the former Ministry of Railways Public Security Bureau, Transportation Public Security Bureau and Civil Aviation Public Security Bureau cannot be directly under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Public Security, there is still a management system, that is, the Public Security Bureau of the Ministry of Transport, which is in charge of railway, transportation and civil aviation public security organs, is integrated under transportation.
The newly established Public Security Bureau of the Ministry of Transport, as the highest leadership and management organization of the national public security organs of transportation, should focus on the laws, regulations, policies and strategies, police work plans and supervision needed by the public security organs of transportation in law enforcement and team management from a macro perspective. Or even if the existing civil aviation and traffic public security bureaus cannot be integrated, a special railway public security bureau should be set up under the State Railway Administration, and the original public security bureau of the Ministry of Railways should be transplanted to the State Railway Administration as a whole to ensure the implementation of the railway public security bureau under the "big traffic" public security system.
Is the cancellation of the Ministry of Railways Liu crazy?
It's hard to say. There are all kinds of factors, so it's hard to speculate.