Regarding the current profitability of Didi, I don't think all consumers and online car drivers have the obligation to be responsible. This means that how much money you earn is your business, but you can't deprive others of benefits just because you earn less.
At present, many online car drivers really can't make money.
For the entire network car industry, if the time is pushed back to five years ago, many network cars can really make money, and some people's income can even reach more than 20,000 yuan per month. However, with the further maturity of this industry, we will find that most online car drivers just work for Didi, and they can't make any money at all. The reason is that on the one hand, the driver of the online car has no subsidy, on the other hand, the driving distance of the online car is too high and the order distribution is unreasonable.
Didi indicates that its success rate is not high.
Didi Company gave a funny response to the complaint of the online car driver: Although Didi Company extracted 20% of the profits of the online car driver, Didi Company did not make any money because their net profit was only 3%. This reply makes me feel angry and ridiculous, because your net profit is closed. What happened to the taxi driver? Will your high net profit give extra money to the online car driver?
This is a very rogue reply, which is not credible.
My personal attitude is very clear. Although I am not a taxi driver, I often use all kinds of taxi software. I don't think Didi distributed these profits as subsidies to users, and I don't think Didi's low profits have anything to do with the network car drivers. Didi said that only earning three points is a matter of Didi, and it has nothing to do with everyone.
In other words, the low profit is the operation problem of Didi, and the driver of the online car does not need to take responsibility, and Didi is not qualified to use this excuse as a shield.