Comparison between East China Medicine and AstraZeneca Medicine Representatives

1.xifan307, slowly, the market will be standardized, and the kind you mentioned can only be less and less. At present, the leading players and developers in the pharmaceutical industry are all foreign companies. I'm not saying that state-owned enterprises are not good, but whether they have research and development capabilities and have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in large-scale evidence-based medical experiments? Most of them copy other people's achievements, and the price is low, which is their direct interest.

2.AZ is a foreign company, a big foreign company. Does East China mean East China in Central America? It is a joint venture company, but it also has the treatment of foreign companies, but the treatment is different.

3. Training, I think AZ is more professional. But East China won't be so bad.

4. In fact, you consider that the treatment is on the one hand, and more importantly, the area and products you are given are related to whether you earn money directly or not, and how much money you earn. For example, when comparing AZ with Pfizer, I will consider regional and product issues. But if it is AZ and East China, if you are given acarbose and non-core products of AZ in East China, I suggest you choose East China. Otherwise choose AZ!

Lgl said the treatment was similar. In fact, many large foreign companies are comparable. Making money depends on bonuses. On the other hand, it is still a question of products and regions. A good product and a good area will make you gain a lot!