Which is better, a large company with stable structure VS a small company that has just started? Small companies learn technology and big companies learn systems. Whether you are in a big company or a small company, you must decide according to your own ideas. Let's explain: which is better: a large company with stable structure VS a small company that just started!
Which is better, a large company with stable structure VS a small company that has just started? 1 First of all, the company foundation
Large companies with stable personnel structure: standardized management and sound system; Perfect welfare and salary system; Clear division of labor; Systematic training and education; Emphasize teamwork and communication between teams. Moreover, large enterprises cope with market risks better than small enterprises.
Small start-up companies: they often lack a complete framework and systematic training system; The company's development is unstable, and employees are prone to unemployment; Profits and benefits are not comparable to those of big companies.
However, entrepreneurs do not need to focus on their own experiences. In fact, more importantly, they should learn from the experience of others and take practical actions to admit that uncertainty is also part of the entrepreneurial process.
Second, the internal system
Large companies with stable personnel structure: sound system, five risks, fixed salary, regulated promotion degree, working 8 hours (with overtime pay) and stable work.
Start a small company: generally, there will be no five insurances and one gold, and sometimes I wish I could break 24 hours into 48 hours. Some companies even have capital turnover problems, and there are problems with the implementation and payment of wages.
Third, the work content
Large companies with stable personnel structure: the work content is almost the same every day, like a screw, as long as you do your job well.
Start a small company: Every day, one thing after another, and different ways make me feel suffocated and tired. It used to be mechanical work, but now it is mechanical work with clockwork, and there is not enough time every day. But speaking of it, the working environment is still relatively free, and there are not many complicated and strict rules and regulations, especially the start-up team, which makes it easier to get along with the boss.
Fourth, room for growth.
Large companies with stable personnel structure: the division of labor leads to narrow work scope of employees, which is easy to make people feel bored and bored; On the road of career development, there will be many competitors, and it is difficult for ordinary employees to stand out there, resulting in fewer opportunities for career promotion.
Start-up small companies:
There will be more job opportunities; Employees hold several positions; Emphasize independent work and deal with problems; Employees will be promoted faster.
Participating in the entrepreneurial process of the company from small to large can lay a personal career and economic foundation. Because small companies have few people and great promotion opportunities, they may even be entrusted with heavy responsibilities from the beginning. In a small company, everything you have is valuable and necessary, and will not be regarded as an accessory. Maybe the salary will be a little lower, but it will be more challenging. The company expects every employee to do his best, so you will be exposed to the whole process of how to run the company.
However, it should be noted that "small companies learn technology and big companies learn system." Whether you are in a big company or a small company, you must decide according to your own ideas. You know, experience is a kind of wealth.
Which is better, a large company with stable structure VS a small company that has just started? 2. Big companies: The feeling of working for others will be less intense.
I know several younger bosses of start-up companies, and they all have one thing in common: they love to satirize migrant workers. As a boss, once it begins to expand, the typical performance is that it loves to discriminate against those who work hard to earn wages in their jobs: diss migrant workers are a sharp weapon for mentally retarded bosses to brush their sense of existence.
A, the boss of a startup company, loves to send chicken soup in a circle of friends. The theme is: Why do most people go to mediocrity from nine to five? Because I am afraid of change, I can only work for others all my life. There is nothing wrong with chicken soup, but the question is, what will those who work for you, pay for you and make money for you think when they know that their bosses look down on them? Do you admire your boss for his high level of thinking? You can only curse his high blood pressure! Because being looked down upon by the boss in life is more hurtful than being criticized at work.
B, the boss of a startup company, likes to share his daily life, such as how he criticizes employees, punishes employees, takes photos with employees and other informal occasions. He never calls employees colleagues, partners or teams, but must emphasize that they are employees under his management. You may think it's because I think too much, but I think it's emotional intelligence. If I start a company as a boss, I will try my best to address my subordinate colleagues rather than employees, because colleagues represent "people who fight side by side" and employees represent "you work for me and I pay you", which means less respect and more condescending.
The essence is to work for others, but the feeling of working in a big company will be much weaker, because big companies usually have a perfect promotion system, and you can clearly see how to move up step by step, as long as you have the ability. But the ceiling of a small company is usually as high as you can see when you look up. The direct leader of graduates may be the director. Yes, you will find various directors of small companies, and then the big boss.
Therefore, there is room for you to talk about your dreams in big companies. I can only talk about the dream of a small company boss.
Large companies can get not only wages paid on time (small companies may not be able to pay on time), but also hidden benefits such as company endorsement, platform aura and personal background. Utilitarian point of view, working in a big company can make profits for yourself in many ways, while working in a small company often gives the boss more than you get.
Second, big companies: the chances of meeting idiots will be reduced.
A post-90 s boss became the official account of WeChat, with hundreds of thousands of fans. The profit model is to receive advertisements and sell goods through e-commerce channels. Not sour, it is really worth learning from peers. It can be regarded as abandoning peers among peers, but after all, it is a very single realization mode, and the company scale is also a small workshop.
Once, the post-90 s boss complained in a circle of friends: "Why can't I recruit employees as hard as the Big Four?"
So do you see, not only the post-90s employees have low vision, but also many post-90s bosses are even more ambitious? They not only directly benchmark themselves against the four big bosses, but also directly benchmark the salary, development, endorsement and platform that their company can provide. Excuse me, how can we recruit employees who are as hard as the Big Four?
Tell me another thing.
My classmate also offered to leave this year. He resigned because his mother had a heart attack and stayed in the hospital for more than half a month before she was out of danger. This incident made him realize that his parents are old and may be away at any time and need someone to take care of them. So he had to give up his dream of working hard in Shanghai and return to a small third-tier county to accompany his parents.
Any normal leader will understand and support this truth, right? At least, no matter how much you give up, you won't keep your employees, will you?
However, my classmate's leadership thinking is very strange. His leader refused to let him go after his classmate offered to leave. The reason is: "even if I go home, I can't change the actual situation of my mother's illness." What logic, companionship can't make mom live forever, so my companionship is meaningless?
This classmate mentioned leaving his job three times and said firmly that he would leave. Later, he talked with the leader in tears, and the leader let go, saying that he would let people go after working for the company for another month. Without the binding of interests, the feelings between people are fragile.
In the workplace, I am not afraid of hardship, I am not afraid of being tired, I am afraid of being forced to have a position. I have heard many reasons for resigning, and there is always one: I am stupid.
It's not that big companies don't have these people, but there are three things for big companies to choose people: high standards, high thresholds and great competition, and naturally there is an idiot filter. The colleagues you work with are generally of high comprehensive quality, and it is difficult for small companies to recruit people, so there are always fish that slip through the net. /kloc-a large company with 0/0000 people may have 1000 people who are stupid, and a small company with1000 people may have 50 people who are stupid. Who do you choose?
Third, big companies: promises are usually not broken.
When I left my job, I went to withdraw my provident fund and found that although I stayed for less than a year, there were tens of thousands of provident funds. The previous company never mistreated employees in terms of five insurances and one gold. However, in the provident fund management center, I met several people who came to consult how to protect their rights because the company did not pay social security.
Please note that paying social security for employees is an enterprise obligation expressly stipulated by law, not an employee welfare policy. Large companies usually don't take the risk of public opinion and don't pay social security to their employees, but it is also common for small companies to bully their employees for saving money.
A reader cried to me. Before she resigned and went to Beipiao, she interviewed a small company and sent a portfolio to HR. HR vowed that she would pass, so she urged her to resign. After arriving in Beijing, HR changed her mind and said that the quality of her works was not high enough and her experience was not enough. Also attacked her with rude words: at your level, it is basically impossible to find a job in Beijing. Don't flatter yourself.
She asked if the company had paid five insurances and one gold, because she wanted to buy a house in Beijing. HR not only refused to pay with confidence, but also hit her: With you, buy a house in Beijing? How big is your heart? The final salary is only 4000 yuan a month, which is the same as her salary in third-tier cities.
what can I do? I quit my old job. Although it is my own thoughtlessness, the most shameless thing for HR is treachery. Her ability may not be enough, but it is hard to imagine that a formal big company will have HR to communicate with candidates in a critical and insulting way.
Finally.
The choice between big companies and small companies cannot be made across the board. Some people die in big companies, while others grow rapidly in small companies. Some people hate making screws in big companies, while others have no choice but to do everything in small companies. There is no standard answer, but if you must give a better answer, I suggest you go to a big company if you have a choice. It is much easier to go from a big company to a small one, and vice versa.
Although big companies have high salaries, good benefits, large platforms and good prospects, but ... don't be embarrassed, the previous conditions have been met, but what is it, just afraid that you can't stand the stimulation of money and forget your initial heart? Big companies can definitely give you one or more of these, but small companies are really difficult.
So, small companies can't go at all? Of course not.
I agree with a netizen in Zhihu that professionalism is very important regardless of the size of the company. Small and beautiful companies can also be more professional than big companies in a certain field, so if you want to go to a small company, please try to consider whether the company is professional in a certain field besides salary, that is, whether the company has broad prospects and whether your personal development is stable.
To go to a small company, I think the best situation is to be a boss who is not stupid and become a partner of a small company, which is the best choice in terms of ability training and potential benefits. Of course, you have to be good enough to make a choice.
Finally, give yourself a step:
Li Xiaolang made it very clear that if he started a small company in the future, he wouldn't be stupid enough to force the boss, right? hahaha.