What was the final verdict on the case that "Mi Yuan" used the name and portrait of "Yuan Longping" to sell rice in the live broadcast room?

Finally, the court ruled that an agricultural company immediately stopped using Yuan Longping's name and portrait in its business, and compensated Longping Hi-Tech for its economic loss of 654.38 million yuan. Academician Yuan Longping has made great contributions to food security, so each of us must respect and protect it, and we can't use the portrait of Academician Yuan Longping and other things to earn improper benefits.

Speaking of Academician Yuan Longping, everyone should miss him very much. After all, it was this man who brought the rice in our country to a new height. We all don't want to accept the fact that Academician Yuan Longping has left. Even in the future, I will think of this person when I eat, and I will start to scrimp, because I don't want Academician Yuan Longping to feel cold. The case that Mi Yuan used Yuan Longping's name and portrait to sell rice in the live broadcast room also attracted everyone's attention. After all, Academician Yuan Longping has left this world, and all his things should be protected and respected. But this studio didn't respect everything of Academician Yuan Longping, but used it to make money. Therefore, the court ruled that the company must immediately stop using Yuan Longping's name and unfair competition in portraits, and at the same time, it must compensate the economic loss of 654.38+10,000 yuan.

This company directly quoted Yuan Longping's name and portrait in its propaganda without permission at all, which is not allowed. Because people respect Academician Yuan Longping, we should support his work. Academician Yuan Longping is gone, but he always exists in our hearts, which gives these people a chance. But Bian Xiao was surprised that an anchor could still bring goods there.

No matter what brand you use, you must first investigate and get permission from others. If others don't have permission, you are equivalent to infringement. And this kind of trademark will actually confuse consumers. I hope you don't do similar behavior.