When the company is relatively small, the problem of share sharing can be solved through negotiation. For example, I paid 300,000 yuan to myself and 65,438+million to the other two people. However, I want to do the main operation management of the company. The two of them just paid a share of the money, and I have to use some of my own resources for operation and management. Then I may hold 70% of the shares, and they each hold 15%. After the tripartite consultation, everyone disagrees, which is ok. When distributing dividends, I will definitely take more shares, because I have paid more.
If it is an absolute project, Party A should account for 60% and the other two should each account for 20%, so that the dividend is fair. But the premise is that the three contributions to the company are similar. A participates in the company's management process, and B and C also participate in the company's management process, but the reality is that it is difficult to be truly similar, because only one person can make the final decision when a company can really talk, and the second boss and the third boss will indeed have certain influence on the company, but the company cannot have multi-head management. There can only be one person who can make the final decision on real events. Too many people will cause problems, and it is easy to say that decision-making efficiency comes first.
So don't pursue absolute fairness, because in some cases, the ordinary employees of a company may not pay for it themselves, but some company leaders think that the company has just been established and has developed quite well. This employee who has gone through two or three rounds of financing has been there, and he has gradually reached the position of middle and senior managers, and may give this employee some performance shares. That is to say, you don't have to pay 2% to 3% of the shares, and then you can get dividends with this share, which will also happen.