At the time of layoffs, the boss had already visited the company and explained the company to see if the employees were willing to stay. Now people leave their jobs voluntarily, and the company is employing people. If this is your choice to leave, it is really unfair. In this respect, Zhang Li is a bit difficult, and I don't know how to choose. In fact, when employees face this situation, they will have some difficult choices. Although in 20 19, some internet companies laid off many people and could "renew their contracts", some companies still did not give in to this winter, and this epidemic made many companies in the storm. In fact, from the employee's point of view, if the company is exhausted, choose an uncomfortable thing, but this may be the employee's point of view. Perhaps, we can look at another point of view, this company is really hopeless, and we really choose to leave.
Poor management is the main reason for most companies. Once the company's operating conditions have problems, in addition to the external environment, the company also has more influence. Market environment Some industries have a direct impact on the current market environment, industrial development and government policies. For example, during the epidemic, most catering and tourism industries will reduce their business, but they must suspend business. Because of the high market in some industries, cakes are only big, and some companies can only separate them from a small cake, and even companies can't distinguish cakes. In this case, once the company has no business, it means that there is no source of income. Special service-oriented enterprises are more obvious, with no products and only services. Once there is no business source, it is basically equivalent to "fragmentation". So, can the company survive and operate normally? So, in this case, can you survive on behalf of the company? In fact, most companies will find ways to search for themselves and finally survive.
The debt crisis, for the company, has great influence and pressure. Debt crisis seems to be widespread in listed companies. The company's current assets ratio has exceeded the company's loan interest rate, and the capital has not arrived, which is prone to debt crisis. On the one hand, some companies of the company itself will expand the scale of the company or the development of the company's business when they operate to a certain scale, or when the company starts. However, in the market, due to the lack of business, the company's current assets did not meet expectations, the company's loans have exceeded the company's total market value, and the company's short-term solvency is extremely poor. At this point, it is easy to have a debt crisis. In one case, you have no debt.
Another cause of the debt crisis is also directly related to the market order. The behavior of market players is not standardized. For example, the property rights of state-owned enterprises are still unclear, and the company has a strong sense of responsibility for state-owned assets, which leads to a large loss of state-owned assets and a worsening debt burden. Unfair competition is serious. Some companies use commercial bribery to publish false advertisements. If they use commercial bribery, publish false advertisements, etc. , or cheat the contract, or take this opportunity to occupy the market and squeeze competitors. This makes the victims' products overstock and fall into crisis, and they have to rely on debts and dramatic payments. Corporate debt crisis can be said to be a commercial disaster, which often goes beyond the company's boundaries, has a negative impact on other related economic executives, and even leads to a chain reaction, and is usually used as a social and economic crisis. For example, the financial crisis of Apex, an American importer, dragged Longhong into the swamp. The financial leverage effect will be negatively affected by interest and capital profit rate, and there will be financial risks. When an enterprise has a debt crisis, don't panic, don't complain and blame the company, which are the only way for the enterprise. I believe the company will find a way to spend money.
The third reason leading to enterprise management is that the company's strategic decision-making is problematic. It's like a helmsman at sea, missing the direction of the ship. Strategic decision is directly related to the boss of the company, a senior leader. They are the people who lead the company. If the direction is wrong, it will be difficult to adjust. Just like Zhang Chaoyang, in Sohu, the problem of unclear strategy was the road of the road. The company's strategic decision is basically the company's "natural gas number", at least it is a matter of time. If you have realized that there is something wrong with the company's strategy, you can jump out of this cycle as soon as possible and plan your next development. In any case, how should we choose to be individual employees when the company has a business crisis or poor management?
If the company has a business situation or debt crisis, it is not a strategic decision mistake. In case the company changes, you can consider staying in the company. Not everyone is willing to choose with the company's difficulties and needs. If they belong to the original partner or founder of the company, most people will choose to trade with the company based on the original partner or company. Frankly speaking, the company is not just a boss or other partners. Choosing a child at a critical moment will not have much work for the employees of the company.
When the company is in crisis, most old employees will choose to own the company cabin. I have a friend who is an old employee of a company for nearly ten years. The company was in crisis and most employees left. Only he continues to be our own company. At the same time, I accepted most of the work of the company. At that time, the company just needed people, but there was no money to recruit, only one person did several people. Later, the company's financial situation picked up, and he naturally became the "hero" of the company. Although he said that he chose the left as a "hero", at least he has been in the company for many years and has feelings. You can help the company out of the predicament.
As the core personnel of the company, of course, it is the company's development business and major acquisition forces. When the company encounters difficulties or bottlenecks, if you are the core employee of the company, you should be a weak force for the company. Just like my friend Zhang Li, as the core of the company, the boss is also very kind to her. In addition to the company's sense of accomplishment, there is also a heart of gratitude to the boss, so naturally, I will choose to stay on the road. Of course, I am talking about the above three situations, and many people still choose whether to leave their jobs according to the company's operating conditions. Especially ordinary employees, even. Although employees and the company belong to labor relations, they are talking about trading relations. However, only at the critical moment can you truly see the "loyalty" of the company. We can also think from another angle. If you choose to exchange difficulties with the company, others in the company will regard you as a "hero" after the company, and some of them will naturally benefit less than you.
Whether it is "money" or "love", the world of the world is not so simple. Especially for some people with families, if the company doesn't even allocate funds or can only set a basic salary to ensure normal living expenses, it must be deleted. Sometimes, we don't want to share our difficulties with your company, but realism is cruel. For most people in the workplace, you have to face high mortgage, car loan and monthly consumption expenditure every day. In order to ensure the normal living expenses, there is only one salary. When there is no economic income or low income, in addition to various loans, the quality of natural life will also be affected. Is everyone willing to choose this?
If you have a deposit at home, you can also support it for a while; If not, you may need to do it in advance. Therefore, it is not easy for everyone. The company has its own difficulties, and its employees also have helpless employees. If the personal conditions of employees do not allow, they will find jobs as soon as possible. Also a normal employee. The company is in danger. Should we stay? Perhaps, you should ask yourself whether you want to have a hard time with the company or seek personal career development. Finally, it is uncomfortable to choose a difficult choice with the enterprise or choose another road to find another way. The reason why I am entangled is because I don't want to disappoint the company. We hope to master the company's crisis and strive to meet the hot springs. Therefore, don't say that the relationship between the company and employees is just a "buying and selling" relationship, if it must be, but at some point, it must be temperature!