(2) Whether the subject matter of the patent application violates national laws, social morality or harms the public interest.
(3) Whether the patent application meets the requirements of the singularity of invention.
(4) Whether the amendment or divisional application applied by the applicant is beyond the scope of the original specification (including the appended drawings) and the claims.
(five) in the case of applying for priority, if it is found that someone else filed another patent application on the same subject between the priority date and the application date, or after searching, it is found that relevant comparative documents were made public during this period, it shall be examined whether the priority claim is established.
(6) According to the retrieved comparison file, judge whether the technical scheme required by the invention patent application is novel and creative, and judge whether the invention to be protected is practical.
(7) Whether the specification gives a clear and complete description of the invention required by the application for a patent for invention, so that technicians in the field can realize it.
(8) Whether the claim clearly and concisely states the scope of protection, whether the claim is based on the specification, and whether the independent claim includes the necessary technical features to solve the technical problems to be solved by the invention.