Question 1: How to write recommendations for scientific research projects? keenteeth (contact TA on the site) 150 words? Let me write you one: "××× is currently one of the research hotspots in the field of organic synthesis at home and abroad. The topic selection of this topic is advanced and has important research significance. The research plan of the topic is reasonable and feasible, and has good innovation. Topic The group has a strong research foundation and is expected to achieve expected research results. The project applicant has undertaken many National Natural Science Foundation, 863 and other projects and has strong research capabilities. "But the application is different. Project opinion requirements are different. Some emphasize the project itself, some emphasize the applicant's scientific research style and ability, and some emphasize the evaluation of the authenticity of the project document. But these are generally the things. robotor (contact TA on the site) After review, the "..." project has profound theoretical and practical significance. The research content it designs is moderate and innovative. The features and proposed innovations are obvious. The content filled in the project application form is true, and the subject content design is relatively scientific and feasible. The person in charge of the research team has outstanding scientific research capabilities and is fully qualified to apply. The relevant scientific research results of other participants in the research group are relatively concentrated, and they have the conditions and abilities to complete the research. Agree to declare. wolf3769 (contact TA on the site) Hahaha, great knowledge!!!:P
Question 2: How to write the number for the review opinion of the unit where the project is applied for: Application form for research projects of the Ideological and Political Education Research Association of Colleges and Universities in Anhui Province Applicant: School: Application date: Anhui Provincial Department of Education Social Affairs Division System June 2008 Instructions for filling out the form 1. Applications must be printed on both sides of A4 paper. 2. The numbers on the cover and the upper right corner of Table 5 are uniformly compiled by the research association. 3． Please write the full name of the department on the cover. 4. Form 2 of the research team members must be signed by themselves. 5. The "Research Categories" in Table 3 are basic research, applied research, and comprehensive research. Applicants are asked to choose and fill in. The "form of results" is generally research reports, papers, series of papers, and monographs. If there are multiple result forms at the same time, they should be separated by "and" or a comma, such as "XX and XX", "XX, XX"; it is not allowed to write "XX or XX", otherwise it will be regarded as the result. The form is unclear. If you have an off-campus cooperative unit, please fill in the "Cooperating Unit Opinions" column in Table 3. 6. No background information of the applicant and research team members should appear on pages 5 and 8 of the table, otherwise it will be invalid. Table 5 - Table 9 are bound separately. 7． If the reporting department in Table 8 involves the scientific research management department of the school, the local *** department, etc., do not include the name of the school or place. It can be written as "the scientific research management department of the school" or "the ×× department of the city where you are located". 8. Form 9 is filled in by experts hired by the Provincial Department of Education when reviewing projects.
Table 1: Applicant’s name, gender, birth date, position, teaching and research department, professional title, last academic qualification, last degree, applicant’s completion status of social science research projects at or above the provincial level (including the Provincial Department of Education), project source, project batch number, project name, approval time, completion status, applicant’s recent 2 Main research results in the past year (indicate the name, year, and issue of the journal in which the results were published) Applicant’s signature: Year, month, day, department’s opinion (the applicant’s academic degree, whether the applicant is a key young and middle-aged teacher or a subject leader, the table above Whether the information filled in is true and whether you agree to apply) Signature of the person in charge of the department (department) Year, month, day Table 2: Information about other members of the research team Name, professional title, age, major, foreign language, language and level Division of labor Signatures of other members of the research team Main research achievements in the past 2 years (Indicate the name, year, and issue of the journal in which the results were published): Date, month, and year of review and seal by the school's scientific research department Table 3: Name of the project: Research direction Research category start and end time Results form Application fund 10,000 yuan Other funding sources School matching: 10,000 yuan or Matching ratio: Funding from enterprises and institutions: Budget estimate of 10,000 yuan (10,000 yuan) Category/Year Year-to-year total book materials fee, research fee, stationery fee, computer fee, printing fee, small conference fee, small instrument and equipment fee, other total purchase of instruments and equipment Name, Quantity, Amount, Opinions of the annual cooperative unit (whether you agree to participate in cooperative research, and provide support in terms of time, working conditions, etc.): Stamped by the cooperative unit, year, month, day, etc. Table 4: Review opinions of the school's scientific research management department (whether there are ongoing research projects, format Review whether it meets the requirements, etc.): Stamped by the school's scientific research management department. Year, month and day. Review opinions of the school's ideological and political research association: ...>>
Question 3: How to write the recommendation opinions of the subject unit in Baidu Search
Question 4: Since the subject host’s professional and technical qualifications do not reach advanced levels, expert recommendation is needed. How should I write the recommendation? Write about what you have done before, focusing on his professional experience
Question 5: How to write recommendations for scientific research projects? Let me write you one: "××× is one of the current research hotspots in the field of organic synthesis at home and abroad. The topic selection of this topic is advanced and has important research significance. The research plan of the topic is reasonable and feasible, and has good innovation. Topic The group has a strong research foundation and is expected to achieve expected research results. The project applicant has undertaken many National Natural Science Foundation, 863 and other projects and has strong research capabilities. "But the application is different. Project opinion requirements are different. Some emphasize the project itself, some emphasize the applicant's scientific research style and ability, and some emphasize the evaluation of the authenticity of the project document. But these are generally the things. xi2004 (Contact TA on the site) Basically no one reads it, right? robotor (contact TA on the site) After review, the "..." project has profound theoretical and practical significance. The research content it designs is moderate and innovative. The features and proposed innovations are obvious. The content filled in the project application form is true, and the subject content design is relatively scientific and feasible. The person in charge of the research team has outstanding scientific research capabilities and is fully qualified to apply. The relevant scientific research results of other participants in the research group are relatively concentrated, and they have the conditions and abilities to complete the research.
Question 6: Recommendations of graduate instructors for biology graduate students Recommendations of graduate instructors 1:
Min Weihong, a native of Da’an City, Jilin Province, is a member of the Communist Party of China. In September 2015, he was admitted to the School of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering of China Agricultural University to pursue a doctoral degree.
During his doctoral studies, the student carefully studied the spirit of the Communist Party of China and the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, and actively participated in various activities of party organizations, schools and laboratories. Treat people with sincerity and enthusiasm, experiment seriously, be hardworking, and work hard. Completed all courses required for applying for a doctoral degree, with excellent academic performance, 17 credits completed, and average score of 81. Published 5 papers in domestic and other related professional journals.
The project undertaken by Min Weihong is an international cooperation project. She used early indica rice, which accounts for 80% of the backlog of rice in my country, as raw material, and based on traditional natural fermentation to produce rice flour. She conducted the first exploration of pure lactic acid bacteria fermentation to produce rice flour. She also studied the mechanism of lactic acid bacteria improving the eating quality of rice flour, and the effect of lactic acid bacteria on starch. The modification and gel formation mechanisms were studied. The process of lactic acid bacteria fermented rice noodles was discussed, and an evaluation model and method for evaluating the chewiness of starch gel foods such as vermicelli, vermicelli, rice noodles and other foods were established. This laid the theoretical foundation for using early indica rice to produce high-quality rice noodles.
This paper is innovative in studying the results of improving the quality of rice noodles by lactic acid bacteria fermentation products and establishing a texture model of starch gel foods. It is applicable to the research on the technology of lactic acid bacteria fermented rice noodles.
The author of the paper can comprehensively review domestic and foreign literature and grasp the trends in this research field. The results of the paper reflect that the author has a relatively solid theoretical foundation and is proficient in advanced microbiology, physical chemistry and food. Experimental skills in engineering and the ability to independently engage in the above scientific research work.
I believe that this doctoral thesis has met the requirements for applying for a doctoral degree. I specifically agree to allow him to defend his doctoral thesis and recommend him to apply for a doctoral degree.
Recommendation 2 from the graduate tutor:
Ding Changhe is a doctoral candidate in the class of 2015. He graduated from Beijing University of Agricultural Engineering in 1990 with a bachelor's degree in food engineering, and in 1998 from Wuxi University of Light Industry in food science. Graduated with a master's degree in engineering, this classmate also served as the head of the technical department for three years at Henan Jinxing Brewery, the sixth largest beer group in the country.
During his studies at school, Ding Changhe supported the party’s line, principles and policies and actively participated in various activities organized by the school and college. In daily research work and study, we can strictly demand ourselves, adhere to the truth, have the courage to explore, be sincere and enthusiastic, be willing to help others, and unite with classmates.
Ding Changhe pays attention to the learning of basic theoretical knowledge and the improvement of experimental skills. He has read a large number of research-related books and materials, and has a wide range of knowledge. I worked hard during my studies and achieved excellent results. I obtained a total of 17 credits and an average score of 85. During the research period, 2 academic papers have been accepted by domestic core journals. Another paper has been accepted by a foreign SCI index source magazine and is being revised. The research topic he is engaged in is the functional oligosaccharide sub-project of the National Tenth Five-Year Science and Technology Project, and the project number is 2015BA7080406. The preliminary research of this project was identified as a scientific and technological achievement by the Ministry of Education in June 2015. In September 2015, the achievement won the second prize of Shandong Province Science and Technology Progress Award. Ding Changhe is one of the main completers of this project.
The graduation thesis completed by Ding Changhe was on the study of Streptomyces high-yielding xylanase and its enzymatic properties. Based on a large amount of domestic and foreign literature, he was the first to screen and identify a high-yielding xylanase in China. Streptomyces tendrils strain of glycanase, and the effects of mutagenesis and optimization of enzyme production conditions on enzyme production of Streptomyces tendrils were studied, and the liquid fermentation enzyme activity was the highest in the country. The paper purified Streptomyces tendrils xylanase and obtained electrophoresis-purified low molecular weight xylanase. The enzymatic properties of the pure enzyme were further studied. These studies laid the foundation for the application of the enzyme. In addition, the paper also optimized the enzyme production conditions of Streptomyces olivine and carried out pilot experiments. Streptomyces xylanase activity was the highest at home and abroad.
This research paper is closely integrated with the development of the national economy. The experimental plan is reasonably designed, the data is accurate, and the conclusions are reliable.
The research results have important theoretical significance and practical value. They are xylan This laid the foundation for the high yield and industrial application of enzymes.
This paper mainly involves microbiology, biophysics, biochemistry, fermentation engineering, etc. >>
Question 7: Are there any good research topics to recommend? Five-Year College Entrance Examination Three-Year Simulation
Question 8: How to write the recommendations for "Poverty Alleviation Star" recommended units. People often ask for templates for recommended recommendations from units. In fact, you just need to fill in the requirements. There are no standards. Below I will send you a version of the successful application. Please modify and improve it according to your actual situation. I wish you all success!
Unit recommendation:
Dr. *** is a teacher at ****** College of our school. He was promoted to professor in *** year and is an academic backbone that our school focuses on cultivating. . He has always been actively involved in teaching and scientific research, with a correct scientific attitude, rigorous academic style, and strong sense of innovation. In the past five years, he has been responsible for and participated in the research work of nearly * projects as a technical backbone, and has won a number of scientific and technological awards and national patents, as well as *** and other awards and honorary titles. It has a high academic reputation in fields such as international technology research. He is physically and mentally healthy, willing to contribute, has independent scientific research capabilities and good qualities, and has good development potential. His foreign language proficiency is good, and the study abroad plan he proposed is necessary and feasible.
After returning to China, this unit will increase its training efforts, provide policy preferences and financial support to its disciplines and laboratories, and promote the rapid development of its key disciplines.
Highly recommended.
Question 9: Novel topics and proposal reports are worth 200 points. Hello, we can arrange for national-level "Thirteenth Five-Year Plan" planning topics to be named. They are true and valid. They can be checked online and will be completed in 3 to 5 months. I hope My answer is helpful to you, hope you adopt it! ! !