Since Marx said that capitalism is an inevitable stage of human society, it shows that he also admitted that capitalism is an objective law and materialism. Besides, at that time, Marx wrote works in capitalist society, which shows that Marx himself is also the product and beneficiary of capitalism, indicating that Marx has the spirit of capitalism. That is to say: if the spirit of capitalism is idealistic, then Marx is idealistic, then all its theories are idealistic; If the spirit of capitalism is materialistic, so is Marx, and so is his theory.
According to what I said above, both capitalism and Marx's materialistic theory are materialistic, so why did Marx say that socialism is the grave digger of capitalism?
Marx's grave digger is an adjective, not asking you to really dig a grave and bury capitalism. Moreover, Marx believes that socialism is the product of capitalism, not the product of feudal society; It is natural forces that naturally push capitalism to socialism, rather than relying on the power of man-made riots to replace capitalism. Because he made it clear that capitalism's entry into socialism is an objective law, he did not say that capitalism's entry into socialism is an artificial law.
Since I think capitalism and Marx's materialism theory are materialism, and since socialism is the grave digger of capitalism, why are there both capitalist countries and socialist countries in the world now? They should not exist at the same time?
First of all, let me not talk about the socialist countries in the world now, but only the capitalist countries.
According to Marx's definition of * * * capitalism, all capitalist countries today are * * * capitalism, but their names have not changed. According to Marx's definition (I can't remember clearly, it means): * * * materialism is a society with highly developed science and technology, distribution according to needs and equality for all; But there are contradictions in any society, and there are also contradictions in capitalism. So let's look at the capitalist countries now:
In today's capitalist countries, science and technology are highly developed, inventions continue, and scientific and technological products are increasingly updated. Isn't this distribution on demand? The rich and the poor have the same rights, and the president and the people are the same. Isn't everyone equal? When running for president, the two men had tit-for-tat views. Isn't this a contradiction? However, the contradictions in capitalist countries have been resolved in the debate during the presidential campaign, and the backlog will not turn into an armed conflict. This is like, a person who likes to sulk is prone to make trouble and lead to tragedy; And a person who vents when he is angry will be finished as soon as he vents, but he will not create trouble.