Due to the emergence of modern information technology and communication technology, there are two important trends in intellectual property infringement: First, the "popularization" of individual infr

Due to the emergence of modern information technology and communication technology, there are two important trends in intellectual property infringement: First, the "popularization" of individual infringements. The implementation of electrostatic copying technology has made it extremely convenient to copy text works on a large scale, and has had a huge impact on the public's habit of purchasing copied works. The popularity of electronic recording technology has made private copying of music and TV programs a hobby for hundreds of millions of families. The second is the “internationalization” of high-tech infringements. In the wide space of the international Internet, knowledge products can be disseminated around the world at an extremely fast speed and very conveniently, and thus be received and used by different subjects in different countries (including legal use and illegal use); due to the cross-border information flow, Large-scale, high-speed movement across space and across regions makes transnational infringement an easy matter. Without leaving home, infringers may act as "cyber hackers" to enter the databases of nationals of other countries to obtain required business information and technical secrets, or to input, store, and display other people's online works on computers. Even if the infringement is against the nationals of the country, the Internet can be used to enter the country under other identities from abroad. Under the above circumstances, every intellectual product may be at risk of "international" infringement. (4) Diversity of types of infringement.

In terms of legislation, infringement of intellectual property rights can be divided into direct infringement and indirect infringement. The law stipulates different fault conditions and penalty standards. The so-called indirect infringement has two meanings: First, it refers to the act itself does not constitute infringement, but its behavior helps and leads to the occurrence of direct infringement, thus causing damage to the right holder, also known as "secondary infringement" . For example, in the field of copyright, the act of intentionally selling, leasing, and importing infringing goods; in the field of patent rights, the act of intentionally manufacturing and selling key components that can only be used for patented products; in the field of trademark rights, intentionally infringing upon the rights of others. Trademark rights activities provide convenient conditions for warehousing, transportation, mailing, concealment, etc. The second means that the "actor" has not engaged in any infringement, but due to the existence of specific social relationships, he must bear certain liability for the infringement of others according to law. For example, the tortious acts committed by the legal agent against the incapacitated person, the tortious acts committed by the employer against the employee for completing the job, the tortious acts committed by the principal against the trustee for the performance of the entrustment contract, etc. are all indirect tortfeasors. The above-mentioned indirect infringements and direct infringements shall bear the same infringement liability.