If you want to evaluate associate professors in higher vocational colleges, which scientific research achievements do the judges value most?

Now neither papers nor works are decisive. What works is that there is at least one provincial project, two or three municipal projects, or the top three or five participants, and the top five at the national level are the best; Then the provincial teaching achievement award, famous teachers, the top five provincial excellent courses, and then the papers and works. Guiding students to win national awards is also considered, but it is not that important. It's not what it used to be. It is more difficult. Popular and scarce majors are easier to handle, while unpopular and unimportant professionals are more difficult to evaluate. Usually, there will be at least one provincial project host with two or three municipal hosts, or four or five or more top three or five participants, plus the provincial teaching achievement award or the top five of the provincial excellent courses. It would be better if it was the host. Then there are one or two cssci articles, one or two extended editions, three or five core articles, plus some periodicals, professional core periodicals, and several editors-in-chief and deputy editors. It is useless to participate in editing. Then there are several college-level topics, teaching awards, scientific research awards, guidance awards, more than one college-level excellent teacher evaluation and so on. , so it is possible to fight. Science and engineering also depends on whether there are horizontal provincial projects and patents. That is, social benefits and application value. So it's getting harder and harder now. Everything is done early, just like buying a house. If it's late, it's basically over. Why is it almost hopeless to say it's too late? First, the conditions are getting more and more harsh and there are so many indicators. First, colleagues in the whole province kill each other first and get in by luck, so they may not be employed in the unit. At present, every school has issued the employment index of professional and technical personnel, which is divided into 13 grades, and the evaluation is the seventh grade, but it depends on whether there are any indicators to hire you. If not, I'm sorry, you can only be a lecturer. So now the vast majority of young teachers simply give up evaluating associate professors and evaluate senior engineers, economists, agricultural economists, commercial engineers, political engineers, animal husbandry, accounting and so on. This should be praised. But there are also quotas and indicators, so I can only do part-time jobs and earn more extra money to live in the future. Besides, most of them are outside the system.