1。 The idea of the institute is illegal. Because the above materials, even the detailed description of the previous work, are used by Sun in this invention, and because these materials are not confidential and the Institute has not signed a confidentiality agreement with Sun, they can be used publicly. The institute should strengthen the management of its own intellectual property rights through this case. Service invention is different from this situation. Service invention means that the inventor is still in the post, enjoys various rewards and benefits of the unit, takes up labor time and directly obtains post information and equipment.
2。 Sun is the patentee, and he has the right to dispose of his intellectual property rights. So it can be transferred to a third party.
3。 In the course of the experiment, only those who have contributed to the substantive content of the patent have the right to ask the question that * * * enjoys the patent. In this case, Sun's assistant only provided the original materials and equipment, but these things did not belong to the employee, nor did they participate in the patented creative labor process, nor did they make substantive contributions, so they did not have rights.