It seems that this item is not required in many resumes. If it must be filled in, think about whether you have won any prizes in your studies or published articles in any journals or magazines. Fill it in if there is one. If not, no, just write no.
question 2: how to fill in the academic achievements, what projects you participated in, what level (such as 973,863, National Natural Science Foundation of China, etc.), and what status you participated in (person in charge? What number of finishers, etc.).
what level of magazines (such as SCI) have you published? What are they? Which author?
what patents have you applied for?
what works have you written and which authors?
what are the important academic awards? (for example, national, provincial and ministerial awards, etc.)
Question 3: How to fill in the "academic and scientific research achievements" in your resume? You can fill in your own published papers, or do projects and experiments with your tutor.
Question 4: How to write a list of major scientific research achievements, academic papers or works (translations)? Should I print out the papers, or just list the projects I have participated in and the papers I have written? View the original post > >
question 5: how to write a brief introduction to technological achievements? The so-called scientific and technological achievements refer to knowledge products with some recognized academic or economic value obtained by people through complex intellectual labor in scientific and technological activities. China Academy of Sciences defines the meaning of scientific and technological achievements in the Measures for the Administration of Scientific and Technological Research Achievements of China Academy of Sciences as: the results of a scientific and technological research subject that have certain academic or practical significance through observation experiments, research and trial production or dialectical thinking activities. Scientific and technological achievements are divided into basic research achievements, applied research achievements and development work achievements according to their research nature;
Turn left | Turn right
The dying brother の 359 | Published on May 27, 216 1: 23
Comments
1
Major scientific and technological achievements in the world in 211-212 Life sciences and medicine 1. The research and development of antimalarial anticancer vaccines has made breakthroughs every year in the world. After 24 years of research, British scientists found an antimalarial vaccine, and the third-stage efficacy test in seven African countries was finally proved to be very successful this year, with an effective rate of about 56% for infants aged 5-17 months. The vaccine is expected to enter the market as early as 215. In December, scientists developed a vaccine against 7% of fatal cancers, which can shrink breast cancer lumps by 8%. 2. The research on human organ tissue regeneration has also achieved fruitful results. In March, American researchers successfully made a human urethra. After the doctor implanted it into the patient, the urethra cultivated in vitro really began to work normally. At the beginning of April, Japanese researchers used embryonic stem cells of experimental mice to artificially cultivate the embryonic structure of retina, which is the most complex physiological tissue artificially cultivated so far. In mid-April, British scientists used human amniotic fluid and animal embryonic cells to cultivate human kidneys in the laboratory. This breakthrough is expected to enable patients who need organ transplantation to cultivate their own organs on demand and avoid the risk of rejection during transplantation. 3. A new study published in early December found that although there is an upper limit of human IQ, the latest magnetic resonance imaging study of brain function shows that some people's brain activity patterns can be changed by transmitting signals, and knowledge can be "induced" to pass through the visual cortex. When learning a new skill in the future, people just need to sit in front of the computer monitor and wait for the technology to be "downloaded" into their brains. Astrophysics 4. Discovery is too ...
Question 6: How to write an academic resume, as the name implies, is to emphasize the introduction of your academic achievements. First, introduce your basic situation and personal data, and then focus on your study experience, and then write about your tutor, your study team, research topics, and awards won.
Question 7: What is "academic contribution"? People often complain or blame themselves. Having said that, people often judge a school of management not by whether it is well managed; To measure the merits of a sociology department, it is often not to look at whether the department is harmonious and United. Russell described Leibniz's character very tacky, but this did not prevent him from saying that "Leibniz is a great wise man who is peerless throughout the ages". Freud also admitted to others that he could not diagnose his mental illness. After all, it is generally believed that the standard to measure the value of a scholar is his or her academic contribution, that is, the achievements of academic research and innovation-papers, monographs, research reports, design schemes, etc., rather than his or her personal quality, lifestyle and working style. Of course, this view is not without objection. There have been various opinions about the relationship between a scholar's "work" and "character". Relatively speaking, as a discipline that relies on the author's intuition and belief, the "work" will be more dependent on "character". But as Leibniz, Schopenhauer, Heidegger and other examples show, even in philosophy, "great works" and "small character" may coexist, especially if we have a moralistic understanding of "character". Similarly, we can indeed find some examples to show that a poorly managed school of management can also be good, and a fragmented sociology department can also be good. In this regard, we might as well say that the academic contribution of scholars lies in their work results, not in their working methods. But imagine, if what we call "working style" not only refers to the administrative management of institutions and interpersonal communication of colleagues, but also includes how scholars ask questions, study and discuss problems, write papers, publish papers and evaluate papers, we will find that the relationship between "working style" and "work achievements" is not only an external relationship, but also the "academic contribution" that scholars can make is not limited to academic achievements. A school of management, no matter how chaotic its management is, is not bad as long as it is not busy writing articles, does not encourage low-level repetition, does not tolerate plagiarism, and does not sell diplomas. The process of knowledge formation includes various links, and their respective meanings are inseparable from their relationships. Whether the same viewpoint is obtained through reasonable research and argumentation not only determines whether this achievement can be trusted by people, so as to play its due role in knowledge development and social life, but also determines whether it can condense and embody the necessary conditions for knowledge progress, so whether these conditions can be preserved and transmitted through its preservation and transmission. China's scientific and technological achievements before the mid-Ming Dynasty were ahead of the world, but the process and conditions to achieve these achievements did not lead the world accordingly, so it was finally unsustainable and fell behind others. The relationship between the process and achievements of scientific research is an important content of Yan Fu's so-called "Western learning has its own uses". Scholars' working methods or the formation of knowledge are also important because scientific research activities are not only a social activity, but also an important social activity, which is becoming more and more important in modern society and knowledge society. The scientific research process includes all aspects, including the individual research of scholars, the relationship between scholars and peers, and the academic evaluation of academic achievements. Whether the research process of individual scholars is reasonable and creative reflects the quality and state of individual scholars, who are not only members of society, but also important members of society. In the same way, the academic relationship between scholars and their peers is not only a part of the cooperative relationship between members of the whole society, but also an important part of this cooperative relationship; The academic evaluation level is not only a side of the whole social justice level, but also an important side of this level. When scholars also turn a blind eye to carelessness, roughness, even strife and deception, how much hope do we have to improve society? Therefore, as far as humanities and social sciences are concerned, while emphasizing their "equal importance" with natural sciences, we should also add a sentence: the process, procedures and methods of their knowledge generation are also "equally important". Considering that the humanities and social sciences research itself is an integral part of the objects they study, that most of the humanities and social sciences research uses natural languages that the public can understand, and that scholars in the humanities and social sciences are often intellectuals facing the public, we might as well say that compared with the knowledge generation process of natural sciences, the knowledge generation process of philosophy and social sciences has a relationship with social life ...... >; >
question 8: introduction of Peng jianbing's academic and scientific research achievements has successively presided over large-scale scientific research projects such as key projects of the national natural science foundation and 973, and has published 7 academic monographs in science publishing houses and other publishing houses, including 4 first authors, and published more than 13 papers in the first academic journals of Science Bulletin, Journal of Engineering Geology and Seismogeology. He has won one second prize for national scientific and technological progress (212) and four first prizes, two second prizes and two third prizes for provincial and ministerial scientific and technological achievements. Recruit graduate students in earthquake engineering and regional stability, rock mass engineering and geological disaster prevention. Recruit doctoral students in major engineering areas such as stability, rock mass engineering, prevention and control of geological disasters, and urban engineering geology.
question 9: how to write an academic summary 1. the principles discussed in this part of research paper writing can be applied to all types of research topics, reports, papers and dissertations, and their writing processes are similar. The general steps of preparing a research paper are (1) selecting a topic, (2) preparing references, (3) collecting information, (4) outlining, (5) writing a draft, and (6) preparing a final draft. Of course, the writing of research papers doesn't have to be done in strict order. You can go back and forth, or do two steps at the same time. 1.1 topic selection involves an overview of the subject area, limiting the topic and narrowing it down, and stating the topic as a problem or hypothesis. In the process of doing research, you will perfect all the decisions and conceive one or more first draft sentences. 1.1.1 Overview of the subject field Tutors sometimes designate a wide field to study. Tutors may designate a special topic, list some possible topics, or let the author choose a topic freely in a wide field. Once this task is announced, you should start thinking about the possible topics of this paper. If graduate students can start collecting possible series of thesis topics at the early stage of their studies, they will be able to choose some graduate courses that are beneficial to the knowledge needed by these topics and try their own ideas in the research group reports or papers. Even in some mature fields studied by other scholars, we can often find the possibility of further research. Scholars sometimes hint at areas that are not discussed or unresolved in their work, and this information usually appears in comments. Sometimes, usually listed but unconfirmed conclusions, or new methods of testing basic assumptions will provide research on the subject. Thinking about the technical terms in your subject can produce innovative ways to explain it or even give it a new definition. The contradiction or separation of views between different books in a subject can also produce possible topics. The current published books or the development of the current direction can provide a new understanding of the theory of existence, thus generating opportunities for in-depth research. 1.1.2 Definition of Topic Once you decide on a topic, you should consider the following factors: your interest in the topic, your ability (especially if the topic is controversial), the time to complete the task, etc. Estimate the possibility according to the following criteria: importance and interest, operability and available resources. You must not want to start a topic that you are not interested in, which is meaningless and impractical, and it is impossible to complete the task within the allotted time. Importance and Interest Naturally, you want to devote your time to a very important and interesting topic. To some extent, importance and interest is a subjective judgment, which depends on the nature of the task and the needs of the tutor. Of course, a topic that seems to be of little use to human beings in one research field may be of great significance to experts in another field. Your tutor is convinced of the importance of your topic, and your paper should convince readers that it is really important. Sometimes, an obviously important topic, such as gun control, may not be a good topic. If a large number of public debates restrict your original ability, or your strong feelings will hinder you from studying opposing views, so that you can't get a fair conclusion. Operability carefully limiting a topic will lead your research to success. If a topic is too vague, too wide, too narrow or too specialized, you will find it difficult to find enough suitable information. A topic that is too wide can't give enough research direction, which may make it necessary to deal with this topic superficially. If a topic is too narrow, you will get insufficient information, which limits your ability to reach a fully effective conclusion. If a subject is too professional, it needs knowledge that you can't reach within the time allocated for the project. For example, you may not choose a subject that requires a lot of statistics unless you have some data background or can consult a statistical professional. Of course, in the end, the reader will judge the operability of your topic through the treatment method you give, because a good paper depends not only on its content, but also on its scope. Available resources Even if a subject is worth studying and operable, it is not appropriate if there are no available research resources needed. The available resources such as the library where you work and other libraries or electronic materials will affect your choice of topics. If your research paper needs a measurement or an experiment, you must determine whether the required data can be collected within the limited time of the task. 1.1.3 The central idea of the topic > >
Question 1: How to write the academic value of creative practical achievements? How do creative practical achievements change people's production and life?
The application value of creative practical achievements.