Answer questions on patent examination opinions

As for the three-step method mentioned by the landlord, it is my own experience. The answer about patent creativity depends on whether your patent is really creative. If there is no creativity, it is useless to use a few steps! My experience is to compare the reference file 1, 2 or 3 mentioned by the examiner with the technical scheme required to be protected by the patent, whether it is exclusive right or subordinate right. If the situation mentioned by the examiner does exist, modify the claim, and re-write the same or similar technical features or schemes as those solved by the technical scheme disclosed in the comparison document into the preface feature part. In this process, you should consider whether there is any technical connection and technical enlightenment between the reference documents. As the landlord said, generally after an exclusive right+subordinate right is settled, another exclusive right and its subordinate creditor's rights are settled! I think it will be better ~ ~ ~ ~ ~