The performance requirements of engineer title evaluation vary from region to region, but generally include the following aspects:
1. Number of completed projects: it is required to show the project scale that the applicant participated in, and different project scales correspond to different quantity requirements.
2. Actual results of professional and technical work: I need to provide a summary of my performance work, which can explain what professional and technical work I participated in. For example, the bid-winning notice, completion acceptance report, project task book, etc.
3. Obtaining awards or certifications: Obtaining the 1 science and technology award for listing (hall) or obtaining related patents can be used as extra points for evaluation.
4. Participate in the formulation of technical specifications: participate in the formulation of 1 a number of enterprise standards or local standards and technical specifications, and promulgate and implement them, which can be used as a reference for evaluation.
The above are the general standards for performance items in the evaluation of professional titles of intermediate engineers, and the specific requirements can be adjusted according to different regions and industries. When preparing evaluation materials, applicants need to submit evaluation materials as required, such as ID card, diploma, qualification certificate, performance certificate, personal work summary, etc. , and affix the official seal of the unit as required.
To declare a senior professional title, one of the following conditions (but not all) shall be met during the current position:
1. 1 Yu won the third prize of provincial (ministerial) science and technology award; Or the first prize of city (hall) level science and technology award 1. (individual award)
2. As the main finisher, he has completed 1 provincial (ministerial) level or 2 municipal (office) levels, or presided over the completion of 1 municipal (office) level or above key projects, major scientific research and major technological innovation projects, and passed the appraisal and acceptance by the industry authorities at or above the municipal level.
3. As the main finisher, 1 national or two provincial industrial technical standards, specifications, procedures, standard atlas, project cost quota and construction methods were compiled, which were formally promulgated and implemented after being examined and approved by the industrial authorities at or above the provincial level.
4. presided over the completion of more than 3 large or 2 large and 2 medium-sized projects, or 1 large and 4 medium-sized or 6 medium-sized construction projects, which were appraised and accepted by the industry authorities at or above the county level. (The host does not participate)
5. As the main inventor, he obtained 2 patents for inventions of this major, or as the first inventor, he obtained 3 patents for utility models of this major, which have been developed and implemented, and achieved good economic and social benefits. (the main inventor of the invention patent is enough; The first inventor of the utility model patent)