Can I apply for a patent for invention?

(1) Review whether the application documents submitted by the applicant comply with the provisions of the Patent Law and its detailed rules for implementation, and notify the applicant to eliminate the defects through rectification if there are any defects, so as to meet the publication conditions; When insurmountable defects are found, a notice of review opinions is issued to explain the nature of the defects, so as to reject the decision and end the review procedure.

(2) Examining whether other documents related to the patent application submitted by the applicant at the same time or subsequently comply with the provisions of the Patent Law and its detailed rules for implementation, and if any defects are found in the documents, notifying the applicant to eliminate the defects by means of correction according to the nature of the defects, or directly making a decision not to submit the documents.

(3) Examining whether other documents related to the patent application submitted by the applicant are submitted within the time limit specified in the Patent Law and its detailed rules for implementation or within the time limit specified by the Patent Office; If it fails to submit or fails to submit within the time limit, it shall make a decision that the application is deemed to be withdrawn or the document is deemed to have not been submitted according to the circumstances.

(4) Examining whether the amount and time limit of the relevant fees paid by the applicant conform to the provisions of the Patent Law and its detailed rules for implementation. If the payment is not made, paid in full or overdue, the application made according to the circumstances shall be regarded as withdrawal or the request shall be regarded as undecided.

How to ensure that once the application is passed, it will not be rejected. What should I pay attention to? If there is any omission, what chance do I have to modify and save it?

If you mean there is no censorship, it is basically impossible.

The estimated proportion of direct authorization cases should be less than 1%. In most cases, opinions will be put forward at the review stage.

As long as your technology is really novel and the technical effect is good, 1~2 comment reply is more likely to be authorized.

As for the problem of loopholes. .

Small holes can be modified later. A big loophole, if it can't be revised later, the case will be ruined.

Once submitted, the relevant text is determined as a legal document.

This is also one of the reasons for looking for professionals to deal with it.