At best, it can be said that it is suspected of plagiarism.
Just condemn a few words, and now you can get hot spots and make profits.
By the way, speaking of this rub, it is actually more accurate. From the technical point of view, everyone seems to be suspected of plagiarism. From the point of view of behavior, it
In fact, it is rubbing, and whoever is angry will rub. The most convenient rubbing method is imitation. Since imitation, it is not far from plagiarism.
Of course, there are also fresh and refined ways to pay tribute.
Also,
If you use a patent and don't pay the patent fee, you should sue It is difficult to defend the rights of subjective things such as appearance plagiarism. We can understand that you are too lazy to sue. It is obvious that patent infringement is so serious.
If you catch something obvious, you should sue it. ?
We ordinary people have a high cost of safeguarding rights, which may be forgotten, but you are a big factory. Didn't you hire such a strong legal team? I'm sorry
Sue, it's good to do public welfare for others for free. Don't go around saying that others don't pay patent fees.
Of course, what you want to do with your patent is your freedom, and we can't interfere. But this kind of operation is combined with speech, and it feels.
A little split, you know. I'm neither Mi boy nor Navy, but I'm sure of my identity and even have some fruit powder.
First, it is suggested to supervise their favorite brands more, so that they can touch porcelain less and fall into some plagiarism disputes less. But in business, it is not a big problem for them to do so.
Moreover, the result of copying each other by manufacturers is that the experience of consumers in various factories benefits. Are you happy? What's the hurry? Maybe you can become a shareholder. The spectator's heartfelt judgment, through comparison, thinks it is plagiarism or reference. The parties ask themselves, is it plagiarism?
Attack, only you know.
If the copy is hidden, then it is basically unsolvable and unclear, and we can only expect the plagiarist to find it and admit it voluntarily.
Of course, many times in life are low-level plagiarism, and you can tell at a glance whether it is plagiarism.
For example, on 15, Mao Degong Group copied my "touching porcelain" liquor, which was clear from the shape, expression, surroundings and gameplay.
It came out.
What if the other party does not admit plagiarism? As long as the color matching elements are other people's original styles, they cannot be used. What others have used can't be used. Suddenly I feel that China designers should stop designing and give a plagiarism warning in minutes.
How can I put it? Let me introduce you to a keyword studio-JQ, a foreign design studio that has produced a lot of visual works.
It is not difficult to find similarities or even similarities in some domestic design works. Not only abroad, but also in China, for many years, various masters and great gods have emerged in an endless stream, and various masterpieces have been providing camps for the laggards.
Raise.
I'd better be tactful. ?
Second, to put it bluntly, 90% of what you can think of (I wanted to say 99%, but I was still conservative, and everyone did it. Look at the old loushu, yearbook, etc. The previous designers were crazy, and it was already a variety of styles at that time.
A hundred flowers blossom, and all kinds of finishing touches emerge one after another. Format, structure and color are still applicable today. Whether it is conscious or unconscious layout, color matching, decorative elements, graphic combination, etc. There will always be a "collision" with the previous work, according to
In the past, it was said that reference or similarity. If it is across the board, then there is really no need to do design, or Party A will do the project.
Then prepare an extra part of the budget to buy "style copyright".
This is the most objective, put facts and reason, and find evidence from professional arbitration to cite precedents.
In fact, so far, there is no clear and quick way to measure whether the over-borrowed design works constitute infringement.
But there are still traces to follow. Come to several groups of plagiarism, and let's see for ourselves which are high-level plagiarism and which are low-level plagiarism.
When it comes to style plagiarism, my first reaction is good. Now I changed my name to Oriental Gift and brought a "new country".
The trend of "Chao", with its illustration style and strong recognition, has spread all over the network at present.
Third, to put it simply,
If it looks like it at first glance, it is suspected of infringement. If it doesn't look like it at first glance, but there are many similarities together, it is suspected of infringement.
At first glance, you can pass the test by comparing it with the pendulum, and then separate it to see how well-known one is in the public domain. If the other one
One can be misleading or related, that is, suspected infringement.
If not, then take out all kinds of evidence and find an expert group to identify it. There is nothing to see in speaking. If those companies' copying methods are worse than hw's own, and others don't win,
Then sue them. If we use hw method, we should sue them in Sakata, and we should win.
If the original hardware is used.
A copy method, and it has been widely used, then you can sue them for plagiarism "hw intellectual property plagiarism and legal protection."
Law ".
Yu Dazui is doing his own thing to step on the legal bottom line, while counting on the moral evaluation of other manufacturers. This double standard is wonderful!
To judge the originality of design, we must first rely on the reputation of practitioners, followed by the self-discipline of the industry, the moral evaluation of society, and finally.
Legal bottom line.
Unfortunately, many times, the bottom line of our law is too low. What is even more regrettable is that the bottom line of word of mouth, self-discipline and evaluation is even lower than this.
Law.
Huawei is the benchmark of science and technology in China and the world's leading technology manufacturer.
Therefore, high-end parent brand Huawei has been copied by foreign unscrupulous enterprises Apple.
The glory of low-end sub-brands is constantly copied by unscrupulous comprador Xiaomi in China.
Moreover, these two companies bought the most water army in China. Every time someone points out plagiarism, there are a group of Apple Navy and Xiaomi Navy crazy.
Angry users: this is called imitation, salute! This is to get out of your own way! Do you have to make square tires to build a car?
Okay？ These people really don't like domestic products! Can't look at apples!