How to fill in the patent examination unit?

An invention can only be patented after the inventor has filed a patent application with the Patent Office, the competent government department, and it has been examined and approved by the Patent Office according to legal procedures. According to the provisions of the patent laws of various countries, when filing a patent application, the inventor must explain the content of the invention and specifically point out the claims. When necessary, the invention shall be explained with attached drawings. For example, the patent law of the United States stipulates that the inventor must submit: (1) specification to the patent office; (2) drawing; (3) Oath or declaration. The most important thing is the instructions. According to American law, the applicant's description should include the name of the invention, the description of the invention, the description of the way and method of manufacturing and using the invention, and the best way for the inventor to implement his own invention. For the above situation, the applicant must truthfully disclose it, and it should be enough for people with professional skills to implement the invention. In addition, the applicant must clearly and specifically put forward the scope of patent protection he requested in the specification. Due to the complexity of the application, if it does not meet the requirements of the law, it will often be rejected by the patent office. Therefore, inventors generally entrust patent lawyers or patent agents to apply on their behalf. (1) Principle of patent grant: According to the basic principle of patent law, only one patent right can be granted for the same invention. When two or more people file separate patent applications for the same invention, there are two principles: one is the invention priority principle, and the other is the application priority principle. The principle of prior invention means that if two or more people file a patent application for the same invention, the patent right shall be granted to the person who made the invention first, regardless of the time when he filed the patent application. However, when adopting this principle, we often encounter many practical difficulties in determining who is the first inventor. Therefore, at present, only a few countries in the world, such as the United States, Canada and the Philippines, have adopted this principle. The so-called principle of prior application means that when two or more people apply for the same invention separately, they don't ask the time when they made the invention, but the time when they filed the patent application shall prevail, that is, the patent right is granted to the first applicant, which is the practice adopted by most countries in China and the world. (2) Patent examination procedures: countries have different requirements for examination of patent applications, and basically implement two different systems. Some countries implement the formal examination system, that is, only examine whether the form of patent application meets the legal requirements, but not whether the invention meets the substantive conditions such as novelty. Some countries implement the substantive examination system, that is, not only the form of application is examined, but also whether the invention has the conditions of novelty, advancement and practicality. Only inventions with the above patent conditions can be granted a patent right. China and most countries in the world adopt the substantive examination system. Patent examination involves many complicated scientific and technical issues. Examining institutions often have to consult patent files around the world for decades to determine whether a patent application is novel, so as to determine whether to grant a patent right. Its task is very heavy. An invention usually takes three to five years or even longer from filing a patent application to being granted a patent right. In order to solve this problem, in recent years, many countries have implemented the system of early publicity and delayed review. The system is that after a certain period of time (usually 18 months, in China 18 months), the patent agency will publish the application in the official patent bulletin; Within a certain period after publication (generally ranging from 2 to 7 years, 3 years in China), the applicant can decide whether to request substantive examination. If the applicant or the third party requests substantive examination, it shall pay the prescribed examination fee, and then the patent agency shall conduct substantive examination according to the request of the applicant or the third party and decide whether to grant the patent right. If the applicant fails to request substantive examination within the prescribed time limit, it shall be deemed to have withdrawn the patent application.