In the presentation stage, there is a positive debate: Thank you, Chairman, hello everyone. From the civilized flower of the Euphrates River to the beautiful flower of human culture today, from the primitive society with a sword and fire to the new economic era with information explosion, the development process of human society has always been a process of knowledge accumulation. The so-called knowledge refers to people's practice of transforming the world. The sum of knowledge and experience gained, while knowledge accumulation is a process of learning knowledge and constantly improving knowledge structure. It includes not only the vertical accumulation of personal knowledge, from less to more, but also the horizontal accumulation of knowledge spread among many people. It is not only an increase in quantity but also a qualitative improvement. Knowledge accumulation is not a simple accumulation but a sublation, while knowledge innovation refers to the process of acquiring new knowledge through scientific research. Knowledge innovation is only a part of innovation, and innovation also includes institutional innovation.
Today, our standard of comparison is to see who has more extensive and significant significance for the inheritance and application of knowledge and the continuous development of human civilization. We believe that knowledge accumulation is more important than knowledge innovation. First of all, from the characteristics of knowledge accumulation, knowledge accumulation has multiplier effect and internalization. The so-called multiplier effect of knowledge accumulation is based on accumulated knowledge, and more knowledge will be absorbed by learning. The snowball of knowledge accumulation will get bigger and bigger, and the amount and value of knowledge will increase exponentially, thus providing abundant knowledge capital for the development of productive forces, and the internalization of knowledge can internalize the external knowledge that exists objectively into the internal knowledge that can really promote the development of productive forces.
Secondly, from the perspective of the development of human society, the main feature that distinguishes human beings from animals is that they can accumulate knowledge, learn lessons from their predecessors, and make civilization pass on. The history of the development of human civilization tells us that the essence of social development is the process of knowledge accumulation, and it takes thousands of miles without accumulation; If you don't accumulate small streams, you can't make rivers and seas.
Without the richness of knowledge accumulation, there would be no knowledge economy era, so knowledge accumulation provides the most basic and lasting impetus for social development. Finally, from the relationship between knowledge innovation and knowledge accumulation, knowledge accumulation is not only the source of knowledge innovation but also its destination.
Every wonderful flower of human knowledge innovation can't be separated from the fertile soil accumulated under his feet, and any innovation achievement will eventually be merged into the ocean of human knowledge accumulation and become the eternal wealth of mankind. I remember Newton said, "I see so far because I stand on the shoulders of giants."
Today, let's stand on the shoulders of thousands of years of accumulated knowledge and look forward to the brilliant future of mankind. Thank you all.
Thank you for the debate. Next, let's invite the opposing side to speak. Your time is three minutes. The opposing side argues: Thank you, Madam President, and hello everyone.
Today, the other debater stood on Newton's shoulder and looked at the future, but Newton didn't have his own innovation? The other debater said: the source of knowledge innovation is knowledge accumulation, so where does the accumulated knowledge come from? Is the source innovation? The other debater said: the destination of knowledge innovation is knowledge accumulation, so what is the destination of accumulated knowledge, and is it innovatively applied to production? The other debater also thinks that the sublation of knowledge is accumulation. If the new knowledge is not created, who will tell us that the old knowledge is wrong? The other debater thinks that it is knowledge accumulation that promotes social development, so how can these new knowledge promote social development be accumulated by accumulation? Knowledge accumulation is the accumulation of existing knowledge, while knowledge innovation is the sublation of knowledge and the creation of new knowledge. He emphasizes the expansion and deepening of knowledge. Although both accumulation and innovation are indispensable, knowledge innovation is more important from the perspective of the essential attributes and social functions of knowledge. First of all, from the essential attribute of knowledge, knowledge innovation is more important.
first, the essence of knowledge is seeking truth. Seeking truth is approaching from relative truth to absolute truth, and expanding from known field to unknown field. It requires people to constantly break through the limitations of existing knowledge with new realization, discover deeper essence, reveal more complicated laws of the world, and be satisfied with the accumulation of existing knowledge. How can the search for truth adapt to the changes of objective existence and break through the limitations of cognitive subjects? Second, the application of knowledge is actually innovation.
The application of knowledge is not a simple imitation or a copy of existing knowledge, because the subject, object, time and place of application are not static. Only by constantly discovering new problems, making new judgments and opening up new ideas can we get new answers and achieve the purpose of application. Secondly, from the role of knowledge, first, compared with knowledge accumulation, knowledge innovation is the first driving force to promote the progress of social civilization, and the progress of civilization cannot be separated from the revolution of productive forces. Only knowledge innovation can continuously create new technologies and tools, realize the continuity and vitality of the transformation of knowledge into real production, and make science and technology truly become the primary productive force. The progress of civilization cannot be separated from the innovation of social culture. Only knowledge innovation can continuously expand the quality and quantity of cultural inventory and create new means and carriers for cultural continuity. The progress of civilization cannot be separated from the reform of social system, and knowledge innovation is the guide of institutional reform.
second, compared with knowledge accumulation, knowledge innovation is the core of national competitiveness. We are in a new era of information revolution in knowledge economy, which gives China a new opportunity to catch up with the advanced. If we are satisfied with the knowledge we have and others, it will be difficult for us to meet the challenge of competition, seize the opportunity of surpassing, get rid of backwardness and squeeze into the forest of world powers.
thank you. President: Thank you for the opposing side's debate. Now, let's enter their one-on-one debate stage. First, choose the opposing side's two debates or the opposing side's three debates for one-on-one debate. Your time is one minute and thirty seconds, please.
Two arguments in the attack and defense stage: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and please welcome three arguments in the opposing side (thank you, please). Can the innovative knowledge directly affect the productive forces and promote their development? Three arguments against it: Does the opponent think that our knowledge innovation is carried out in a society outside the earth, or does the opponent think that knowledge innovation is carried out outside the knowledge system, and knowledge innovation is completed in the knowledge system and in our society. It is not enough to create it, but it needs to be applied to social productive forces. This is the significance of knowledge innovation.
Ask for a debate contest-knowledge is more important than ability. It takes three minutes to make an opening argument and write it well.
Young people ... Argumentation is the core of the whole debate contest, and it is the basis of your two, three, four debates. I'm going to make an argument for you, which is equivalent to making the whole debate contest for you ... When we play the debate contest, it will take more than a week to make and write an argument and try to overturn it. Even if you dare to use it, do you use it well? You know, the only defensive weapon in the cross-examination of a debate is argument, not your own argument. What do you use to really understand him? In case there is a logical loophole in the argument I made in a few minutes, it means that your team has directly lost the judgment ... Some things can't come out of Baidu ... You have to ask about the counter-attack, the battlefield anticipation and so on. I have to say, ask me to make a judgment ...
It is more important to learn knowledge in the debate than to cultivate ability
Prove your argument with arguments.
Before the start of the competition, you should look at the information about your argument, write it down, and remember to find something that can be proved. Then you can simulate and refute your own arguments and arguments, and then you can support your own arguments and arguments. In this way, you can find the weaknesses of your arguments and arguments that may be refuted by others, and solve these weaknesses before the game, so that you can predict the future.
and this rebuttal is an ability that you can't learn for a while. The following is the information I am looking for. Please refer to it and look for it yourself.
Ability is based on knowledge. Without knowledge, what about ability? No matter in life or study, no matter how high the ability is, there is no knowledge to pave the way, isn't it a waste of time? Pay attention to the difference, knowledge is not equal to education, just make it clear, knowledge is all-round, and all new things you come into contact with in life can be counted as knowledge. As long as you grasp this argument, it is estimated that there will be no problem. Remember that the other party will definitely take education as an example, so it must be clarified that knowledge is not equal to education, which is completely different. You can also strongly refute this argument. Education proves that you have obtained a certain qualification, and this qualification represents your ability to obtain this qualification. Knowledge is the foundation of ability! In this world, there may be many people who haven't read many books and haven't accumulated enough knowledge, but they have accumulated enviable wealth and achieved remarkable social status by virtue of their initiative and drive, but they have only satisfied themselves and realized their social values, or they have benefited a few people related to them.
But we know that those who have accumulated enough knowledge and have enough understanding of science will always guide the development of our world. For example: Watt brought the world into the industrial age; Edison let the world enter the era of electrical appliances; The Wright brothers made the distance between the world very short and so on.
people who can influence the development of the world are always those with great wisdom and profound professional knowledge. Even in other fields, such as intellectual figures in the economic field, leaders who have made great contributions to the world in politics, Kant and Freud in philosophy or humanities, Socrates and Leonardo da Vinci, who is not the top figure who guides the development of the world and inspires human wisdom? If there is not enough knowledge accumulation and creativity, will the world be as colorful and diverse as we have seen? It is their outstanding achievements in various fields and directions that have opened up a space large enough for the whole world (just like a polygon, these people and their focus areas are the points of the polygon. The more these points expand outward, the larger the polygon area will be, and the greater the space for human beings to play. I wonder if this metaphor is easy to understand? ), so that those so-called "capable" talents have enough room to play themselves! Even those who we think are capable, if they don't accumulate enough knowledge, the space they can play is too limited, and they won't have an impact on the world.
So, ability can only achieve yourself, and knowledge can guide the world! We can highlight that knowledge is more important than ability from several aspects. We have learned in junior high school that teachers preach and teach students to solve doubts. Is it ability to preach the Tao? As far as circulation is concerned, the transmission of ability is not circulating and unrealistic, while the circulation of knowledge is very convenient, while the transmission of ability is completely unrealistic. For a simple example, a cockroach can live for a week with its head broken. This is the ability of a cockroach, but can the ability of a cockroach be transmitted to us? Obviously not, but we can learn a lot from the cockroach's decapitation ability, and the ontology of conduction is knowledge, not ability (here is a trap). If experience is a systematic knowledge reserve, then we don't need to continue the debate today. If the other debater thinks it is a manifestation of ability, well, the embodiment of ability, that is to say, knowledge is an ontology, and ability is just an external one, if the ontology is not seen. Obviously, the opponent's debater is still the second from our point of view. The so-called "all changes are inseparable", whether you have knowledge first and then absorb those abilities, or you have the ability first and then sum up your own knowledge, no matter which means you choose, as conduction and final summary, it is still knowledge. When we read from primary school to university, we are all absorbing knowledge, and in the way of absorbing knowledge, we can acquire abilities, but if the opponent's debater wants to. The knowledge my high school teacher gave me is a sick sentence. I don't know if the other debater will think this is a sick sentence, but the ability of the person is important.
but knowledge is the basis of developing ability. There are many people who may be very capable, but they are turned away from good jobs because of their diplomas.
But if people without knowledge have the ability, they can only work more and get less. For example, the workers in the construction site, some people know a lot by themselves, such as carpentry, bricklaying, etc., but their lives are lacking because they have no knowledge.
1. Develop your ability. Where does your ability come from? Of course, it is the knowledge you have learned from books, from life and from others. As the saying goes, without learning and skill, where can you get the ability without knowledge? There is a mother-child relationship between knowledge and ability. You can't just look at your son. What's important is that this son has his mother.
2. If the two are separated, it is just like the relationship between philosophy and other sciences. A person may be very capable, but he doesn't understand the reason why he is strong, so he can't be stronger. Just like the popular legend of bruce lee, it's not enough for you to practice your agility and strength. You need to understand the truth of nature, at least look at the anatomical map and know the human mechanics, so that you can improve again.
the ability based on knowledge can only be improved in the future. Whether knowledge accumulation can be regarded as a learning process, while ability refers to the subjective conditions necessary to successfully complete an activity.
(excerpt from Baidu) In other words, ability training is to cultivate a person's ability to complete an activity, which can be regarded as training practice.
Is it important to learn knowledge or cultivate ability?
First, everyone needs to learn to teach themselves? In a broad sense, anyone who wants to make a difference and make achievements cannot do without self-study.
? Not to mention that people who have not entered regular universities or technical secondary schools need self-study, even students trained in institutions of higher learning also need self-study. A university president once said to his graduates: University graduation is like a bowl of clean noodles, with a spoonful of fried sauce, Zhajiang Noodles, a few ribs, sparerib noodles and a few pieces of fat meat.
who will put these things? After graduation, of course, I mainly rely on myself to learn by myself in practice. What a person learns after graduating from college is like nine Niu Yi hairs to what he should learn in his life.
Most of what college students learn in school is basic theoretical knowledge, and more applied science and practical technology need to be supplemented and perfected by self-study as needed after entering the society. What college students learn at school is not so much knowledge as the ability of self-study.
? If knowledge is compared to gold, then the ability of self-study is alchemy; If knowledge is compared to fish, then the ability of self-study is the ability of fishing. ? With the development of society, the total amount of human knowledge is increasing.
Today, with the rapid increase of knowledge, intensified competition and rapid changes in science and technology, the only way for people to adapt to the ever-changing new life is self-study. Therefore, UNESCO warned in its thematic report on survival: "The illiterate people in the future are not illiterate people, but people who can't learn."
? Not only did not