(1) The negative view is that it is a waste of enterprise personnel and resources.
(2) The positive view is that we should seize the opportunity to obtain more basic patents, and it is easier to obtain high-quality basic patents, so as to win the right to speak for the subsequent standard formulation.
I agree with the second view. In the wireless communication industry, standard essential patents are obtained through prospective patent layout. Since the implementation of 3gpp communication standards, we have always followed the way of formulating standards first and then developing products according to them. This explains that Qualcomm has earned a lot of patent fees on 2G, 3G and 4G communications, even exceeding its product income, making it a standard setter in the industry, and communication equipment companies must pay valuable patent fees.
Debate between Huawei Polar Code and Qualcomm LDPC Code Standard
20165438 2006+010/0. In the voting of 5G short code scheme at the187th meeting of 3gpp RAN, Huawei's Polar code scheme became the eMBB scene coding scheme of 5G control channel. Huawei's victory is not accidental. Huawei began to lay out 5G Polar patents in 20 12, and the number of applications reached its peak in 20 14, reaching 140, and the patent layout was basically completed. After 20 15, the competitor Qualcomm's LDPC code patent gradually has the relevant layout. Huawei is four years ahead of Qualcomm, which is also an important reason for Huawei's victory.
The victory of the patent standard dispute led to Huawei being suppressed by the beautiful country, resulting in no core available. Powerful country in science and technology. Don't neglect the layout of future patents for the sake of current capital plunder, and you won't be trapped in the near future.