Which company in the world do you think is the least likely to fail? Why?

First of all, the author thinks that there is no absolute thing in this world, so the subject itself is a false proposition, but it is still worth analyzing.

Why can't any enterprise fail? Because the times have been changing, not only the times are changing, but also people are changing. And the key to the survival of enterprises lies in people.

In other words, if the supply of enterprises cannot meet people's needs, they will go bankrupt.

Take a simple example, Nokia. Nokia once occupied half of the mobile phone market. When it comes to the best mobile phone, everyone defaults to Nokia. But who would have thought that this former giant would collapse and be replaced by Apple?

The key reason is that Nokia "does not innovate". With the change of time, the supply of Nokia can't keep up with the needs of users, and when Apple leads the era of smart phones into our lives, only death awaits Nokia.

Now, Apple has stood at the top of the world's enterprises, with the largest market value and become the greatest company on earth.

That apple won't die?

Of course not. As we all know, after Steve Jobs died, it was difficult for Apple to make a historic breakthrough, and its performance was slowly declining. If one day, a new company of Apple is revolutionized, then Apple will end up like Nokia.

Therefore, there is no enterprise that will never fail, and only enterprises that are brave in innovation and change can survive for a long time.

This question is very interesting.

The development of the Internet is only a few decades, so most of today's very beautiful technology companies are not qualified to say that it is impossible to go bankrupt.

Similarly, the automobile industry with a history of more than 100 years is also a major force in the world's top 500, and they are not qualified to think that it is impossible to go bankrupt.

In addition, it is hard to say that many enterprises in the energy industry will not go bankrupt. After all, the mineral energy on the earth is almost non-renewable. Once it is exhausted, these enterprises will lose the foundation for survival. Moreover, although the upgrading of the energy industry is slow, it does exist, and it is very likely that nuclear energy will replace all other energy sources one day.

I think it is necessary to analyze what conditions will affect the stability of an enterprise, and then answer which one is the least likely to fail.

First of all, the development of enterprises can not be separated from the influence of external environment.

The so-called external environment, the big aspect refers to political policy, and the small aspect refers to the degree of industry competition and the stability of business environment. The more enlightened the politics, the less the external opposition regime, so the more peaceful and stable the political environment for enterprise development, the more just the policies, and the more rational the enterprise development. Industry competition and business environment are the second, which depends on the cultivation of enterprises themselves.

Simply put, the less uncontrollable factors, the better, and the more controllable factors, the better.

Secondly, the management system of the enterprise itself is very important.

Management system is internal strength, the soul and DNA of an enterprise. For a simple example, if a factory's management system tends to encourage innovation, and can do a good job of supporting the system to encourage innovation and put it in place, then such an enterprise will become an innovative enterprise. But it doesn't mean that this is the ultimate, and the ultimate management system is bound to be closely related to the main business of the enterprise.

What a good management system can provide is that it can combine all the forces of the enterprise and move in the same direction. Sometimes it can even help enterprises find a more reasonable direction.

Finally, long-term interests and stability are important.

If you want to maintain long-term interests, then technology will become an inevitable choice, and in the future, technology will increasingly become the foundation of a company's survival, because it can form a track advantage. Stability needs more brilliant wisdom. How to make science and technology a means to meet people's basic needs will not change dramatically because of the change of human science and technology, just like paper, but the demand has not declined for two thousand years.

According to these points, we can simply sum up the main factors that affect the enterprise: uncontrollable political factors, peers, management system, technology and meeting basic needs.

If we can achieve these points: a stable and peaceful political environment, no competitors in the same industry, advanced management system and advanced technology, and meet the most basic needs of mankind, then such enterprises are most unlikely to fail.

The first company I think of is actually a Swiss bank.

First of all, Switzerland is a neutral country with a stable political environment and few hostile regimes.

Secondly, as far as private banks are concerned, they are also in the leading position in the industry, and even enjoy sufficient status in the industry.

Then its management system has already become an industry model, and even regards confidentiality as the core of corporate culture.

Then its secrecy technology and a lot of efforts for secrecy make it very deep in technical barriers.

Finally, it satisfies people's control over money, and this demand will not change with the changes of the times, because Adam Smith said that people are born and always selfish. The emergence of banks itself is evidence of this argument.

Above.

State Grid

State Grid Corporation is stronger than anyone thought. Listen to me.

After reading the documentary article written exclusively by Zhang Wei, former director of the National Energy Administration, for China Economic Weekly, I summarized my views.

1.65438-0999, the national power grid pattern was chaotic, and the power grid systems of provinces and autonomous regions were independent and disconnected.

Second, 1999 has a * *1/power grid with an installed capacity of over 2 million kilowatts. At that time, there was no unified national power grid system, and each power grid only cared about its own business.

Third, management confusion. In some places, water and electricity are managed by the water conservancy department, and in some places, forest and electricity are managed by the forestry department.

Fourth, China's economy is developing at a high speed, but the demand for electricity is difficult to adjust. Every place has its own small abacus, and it is impossible to play a game of chess all over the country.

5. How to transmit electricity from west to east? How to manage Hainan Island? Are all difficult problems to solve.

In fact, the biggest problem facing China is the uneven distribution of resources. A large number of people in China are concentrated in the eastern plain, but resources are very scarce, especially power generation resources. However, the western region is rich in clean energy such as hydropower, photovoltaic and wind power.

Power grid should not only serve the optimal allocation of resources, but also serve the national macro-strategy.

The existence of State Grid is not only related to the strategic security of the country, but also the second company among the top 500 companies in the world. In 20 18, the revenue reached 2358 1 100 million yuan.

State Grid Corporation of China is also the enterprise with the highest number of patents granted in China, with 3,622 patents granted by State Grid in 20 17, higher than Huawei's 400 patents.

At the same time, the "UHV transmission technology" independently researched and developed by State Grid Corporation of China is the most complicated and difficult power technology so far, which completely reversed the passive situation that China's power industry has been following the development of western developed countries for a long time, and gave birth to the "China standard", which has been applied to the global power grid system, providing a solid technical foundation for the future global power grid interconnection.

There is a concept in economics called TBTF, which means too big to fail. The popular explanation is that when the scale is particularly large or occupies a vital position in the industry and is highly related to other industries, once an enterprise closely related to people's lives closes down, it will cause a chain reaction of closure and even threaten social stability, and the government must try its best to save it so as to avoid endless future troubles.

Therefore, enterprises that meet the conditions of "too big to fail" are almost the least likely to fail in the world.

According to this idea, we can basically focus on two aspects:

One is G-S II (global systemically important insurance institution).

The newly released nine companies, China Ping An, are also on the list. These institutions all play a vital role in the financial market and have global characteristics. Once they fail, the earth will be pried up. However, this is not absolute. Just like in the 2008 economic crisis, the Federal Reserve rescued Bear Stearns, Citibank and American International Group, but it was helpless to Norman Brothers, the fourth largest investment bank in the United States. In the end, we can only let it go bankrupt and end the exit. It can be seen that "too big to fail" is somewhat fascinating.

The second is the Internet oligarchy.

For example, in China, the first thing that most people think of is probably Ali and Tencent. After all, these two giants have almost monopolized the Internet in China, which is an indispensable part of the financial chain. If they go bankrupt and the capital chain breaks, it will also cause immeasurable losses. If it can't be saved like the Norman brothers, it can only be declared closed. The Internet is upgrading rapidly, and there will always be newer and better things to replace the old ones. Everything follows this rule. However, at present, the probability of seeing these enterprises close down in our lifetime is zero.

For more high-quality content, please continue to pay attention to magnesium guest network ~ ~

On this issue, Zhou Tingting, a commentator of the Chief Investment Officer, thinks that the world is changing rapidly and every enterprise may go bankrupt.

If you have time to spend a day in the industrial and commercial bureau, you will find that many people come to register enterprises every day, and many people come to cancel enterprises every day. Every day, so many enterprises are established and so many enterprises disappear. You have to sigh, sometimes how fragile an enterprise is.

It is better to say that the enterprise that is least likely to fail is the industry that is least likely to disappear. China is a socialist country, and its economic development begins with basic necessities of life. The grain industry will not close down, but the farming technology is changing. Food is still the same food, and people cannot live without it.

An enterprise must be able to keep pace with the times if it wants to survive for a long time. With the development of the times and constantly meeting people's needs, there are outstanding people in every industry. But even the leader may go out of business if he doesn't make efforts to innovate. Think about Nokia in those days, which is a typical example. If you can't keep up with the trend of the times, you will soon be eliminated.

I'll think about it. It's really hard to find a company that can stand forever in the world. No enterprise dares to brag like this. It's like people say, "Thirty years in the East, thirty years in the West." Even bankers can't exist forever. The word "century-old enterprise" is such a problem.

But there is really no absolute thing in the world. When I came into contact with this problem, after five hours of online inquiry. I really found it. And it is unknown, almost everywhere. Basically surrounded by mountains and rivers, the scenery is beautiful and far away from others. And regardless of holidays, its business is booming and guaranteed. Readers, have you guessed? Actually, this is a funeral home. Since its birth. Its staffing is getting bigger and bigger. The composition of the staff is gender-neutral. From centenarians to newborn children; Senior officials and ordinary people don't meet, but they have entered this enterprise. Be a part of it. I believe that as long as human beings exist. It will never close.

With the development of society and the progress of science and technology, many things in the world have been eliminated.

Maybe a world-famous enterprise today will go bankrupt tomorrow.

Which company is the least likely to fail? This depends on the nature of the industry and enterprise.

After all, even a monopoly enterprise may be defeated by its competitors.

In other words, if you want to be invincible, you must have at least the following points.

First, at least if it is a monopoly industry, the enterprise must be in a monopoly industry.

Second, it must be a state-owned enterprise, yes, it is a state-owned enterprise. There will be no competition between state-owned enterprises and monopoly industries, and no one can compete in an invincible position.

No one thought that Nokia, which had been all-powerful, would fail, and no one thought that Microsoft, which was in a monopoly position, would face strong challenges from Google and Apple.

Even Intel, the giant in the chip field, will disappear under the wave of mobileization.

Therefore, although private enterprises monopolize, they are useless and will be strongly challenged by other opponents.

Maybe it will be fine in ten or twenty years, but who can guarantee it after thirty or fifty years?

State-owned enterprises are not monopolized, persistent and useless. China used to be a state-owned enterprise. How many are left now?

Therefore, I think it is very important for state-owned enterprises to insist on monopoly. Maybe we'll never see it go bankrupt.

Let alone three barrels of oil, because the oil will run out. Fifty years later, three barrels of oil may have changed careers, and technology at that time has replaced oil.

If nothing else, just those domestic enterprises that will never fail.

First, China Tobacco.

China Tobacco is both a company and a manager, so it is difficult to have both. China tobacco has a complete monopoly, which is much more insulated than the beer industry.

There are so many smokers in China. As long as there are more people, a new group of smokers will be born.

Continuous circulation, every smoker is the financial source of China tobacco.

Therefore, as long as the policy remains unchanged in the future, China Tobacco will not close down.

Besides, no one will hit his own seven inches, so the possibility of China Tobacco going out of business is the least.

Second, the State Grid.

It is impossible to go bankrupt. In the process of development, we use more and more electricity. It can be said that electricity is essential in the future, and it will only increase. There will only be more and more electrical appliances in our home, so we can't live without electricity.

Everyone can't live without electricity, so it is impossible for the State Grid to close down.

The same is true of such companies abroad. As long as they are monopolized and persisted by the state, they will not go bankrupt.

Salt-making enterprises can't go out of business, because it is a necessity, and three meals a day is inseparable.

I don't think the military enterprise will go bankrupt.

Hundreds of countries in the world cannot be unified into a whole. As long as there is no reunification, all countries should produce all kinds of military products to consolidate national defense.

Military enterprises are key enterprises in various countries, and it is difficult to close down.

Which company in the world do you think is the least likely to fail? Why?

In this world, since the existence of human beings, with the development of human life, the progress of civilization and the innovation of science and technology, it can be said that countless enterprises have survived and developed in adaptation, and countless enterprises have closed down in competition.

According to the question, which enterprise in this world is the least likely to fail? I don't think there are more than three enterprises: the first is a grain sales enterprise, the second is a tap water enterprise, and the third is an electric energy enterprise.

The reason is simple: grain sales enterprises are enterprises that human beings can never survive and develop. If this enterprise goes bankrupt, it means that human life and development have come to an end, and this world is not called the world. Water is the lifeblood of human existence. People living in this world will not have the conditions for survival without the nourishment of water. Electric energy enterprises are indispensable "power" for human survival. If this enterprise goes bankrupt, it means that the operation of the world will go backwards for hundreds of years and even return to primitive society.