Please recommend a micro-camera.

1, judging the standards of digital cameras (including SLR, single battery, non-reflex, notebook computer) mainly depends on two systems. One is the control system, which mainly includes focusing accuracy, focusing speed, area range, shutter lag, continuous shooting ability, viewing comfort, endurance, and resistance to harsh environment (desert, cold, wetland, etc.). ), and the firmness of the fuselage. The second is imaging system, including sensor quality, lens quality and image processor technology. Among them, the sensor accounts for 45% of the image quality, the lens accounts for 50% of the image quality and the processor accounts for 5% of the image quality. In addition to the appearance, the internal quality of digital cameras depends on these elements, and the standards are the same. The high-quality camera with good image quality and the flagship camera with good control system;

2. At present, the mirrorless cameras (micro-cameras) on the market mainly include Hasselblad, Leica, Sony, Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Pentax, Sigma, Samsung, Panasonic, Olympus, Kodak, Xiaomi13;

3. Hassou. There is only one Hasselblad micro-unit in Sweden, namely Hasselblad X 1D, which is equipped with a 5 1000000 pixel medium format CMOS sensor and an XCD bayonet developed by Dalsa Company in Canada. This is the best micro-single at present, and it is not expensive.

4.Leica. Leica's micro-camera is T series (typ70 1), equipped with16 megapixel half-frame CMOS sensor, which was developed by Belgian New Vision Company (CMOSIS). Leica is a luxury in civil cameras, and its advantages of good image quality, especially excellent color, are well known. The disadvantage is that the control is very general, and compared with the expensive price, the control is at most in the middle. Leica also has a small Quan Huafu paraxial camera with interchangeable lenses, which is better than the micro-single, but it does not belong to the micro-single;

5. Sony. Sony Micro-single is producing series A, with A7RM2, A7SM2, A7M2 full picture, A6500 and A5000 half frame. All sensors developed by Sony are used, and the pixels of different models are different, and the color depth, dynamic range and available high sensitivity of different models are also different (not detailed here). Sony is in a leading position in the research and development of sensors, with leading technical indicators and excellent tolerance (dynamic range), which is proved by the evaluation of DXO Lab, the most authoritative third-party sensor evaluation agency in the world. Sony's new micro-single has many industry-leading technologies, so I won't go into details, but the lenses of Sony's micro-single are polarized. The high-end Zeiss lens and Sony G lens are good but expensive, while the low-end lens is poor and lacks good civilian lenses. Sony micro-single has the advantage of true color reproduction, but the disadvantage is that the automatic white balance is blue and cold, and the portrait skin color is not as pleasing as Canon.

6. Canon. Canon micro-EOSM series, currently developed to M5. Canon micro-single is equipped with a half-frame sensor (different models) developed by Canon itself. The advantage is that RGB color separation processing technology is better, but the disadvantage is that the tolerance is not good enough. Although the tolerance of EOSM5 sensor has been greatly improved, it is still not ahead, which is wrong for camera predators. Canon has not put all the latest technologies into new products, and its nickname "Toothpaste Factory" is not groundless. Canon's micro-single has the advantage of better portrait color, and M5' s full-pixel autofocus technology is also very advanced. The disadvantage is that there is a big picture quality gap between JPG and RAW, and the direct smear is more severe, but the compression ratio of RAW is 14, which is better than that of other micro-single 12 RAW (but not as good as Hasselblad's and the same as Sony A7RM2). Canon micro-single has fewer original lens groups, and it is necessary to use the lens group of Canon SLR through the adapter ring.

7. Nikon Nikon microchip is J/V series, equipped with 1 inch 20 megapixel sensor developed by Aptina company in the United States. The advantage is that continuous shooting is very powerful, but the disadvantage is that the sensor area is small. With the popularization of 1 inch induction card machine, the vitality of Nikon J/V series micro cards is limited;

8.fuji. Fuji micro-orders can be divided into high-end XT series and entry-level XA series. Equipped with X-Trans CMOS sensor developed by Fuji (also equipped with different types of common sensors), the RGB pixels of imitation film are arranged in disorder, and no low-pass filter is needed, so the resolution is higher. Fuji micro-sheet has the advantages of good color, bright and pleasing to the eye. The disadvantage is that the RAW format also has tailing phenomenon, and the XF lens with better quality is more expensive. Now Fuji has released the first medium format micro single GFX, which is very good and expensive.

9. Pentax. Pentax micro-single now only has QS series, equipped with Sony's12 megapixel/1.7 inch sensor, which has the advantage of good color, especially green, but the disadvantage is that the sensor area is too small and the imaging is not as good as that of the card machine. Pentax micro-sheet is the smallest handheld micro-sheet, ranking first in the world as a toy, and has no bright spot as a tool;

10, Yima. The SDQ series of Sigma Microsystems is equipped with X3 sensor patented by Sigma Kodak Technology Co., Ltd., which has two types: half-frame and H-frame. Because the technology of X3 sensor is different from the usual MSK sensor, RGB pixels are stacked in three layers, so there is no need to guess the color, so it has unparalleled image quality advantages. The picture quality of half frame can be comparable to that of medium frame, and Sigma's art series lenses are moderate in price and good in quality, which can be compared with top lenses such as Zeiss and Leica. The disadvantages of Sigma micro-sheet are that RAW format must be used to show amazing image quality, high requirements in the later stage, trouble and poor low-light imaging.

1 1, Samsung. Samsung micro-single NX series is equipped with half-frame sensors (different models) developed by Samsung itself. The technical indicators of evaluating Samsung sensors by DXO in France are also very good, and the picture quality does not need other micro-single differences, but it does not have its own characteristics and highlights, especially the quality control of Samsung needs to be improved. Samsung's own lens is very poor, and the high-end German Snyder lens is very expensive;

Panasonic, 12. Panasonic micro-orders include GH, G, GX and GF series. It is equipped with self-developed 4/3 inch sensors (different models). High-end gh series is the best camera to shoot video, and there is no one. Panasonic micro-single has the advantage of fast focusing, but the disadvantage is that direct color is not ahead. Although the color of Panasonic has improved rapidly recently, compared with other manufacturers, color still has no advantage; The biggest advantage of the 4/3 system micro-single is that it achieves the best balance between image quality and portability, and the lens group supports strongly. It is particularly worth mentioning that Panasonic's quality control is very good and there are few quality problems;

13, Oba. Oba micro-sheets are divided into three categories: EM, EPL and EPM series, as well as retro PEN-F. It is equipped with 4/3 inch sensors (different models) developed by Sony (and some Panasonic). The advantage is that the fuselage is high-end five-axis anti-shake, leading in the industry and very powerful. Oba's five-axis anti-shake has been imitated and never surpassed. As a member of the 4/3 system, Oba has the same advantages as Panasonic, but the disadvantage is that the automatic white balance is never accurate and it is red. Once the warm color switch in the machine is turned off, the warm color will not be warm;

14, Kodak. Kodak micro single S 1 is equipped with a 4/3 inch16 megapixel sensor developed by Sony, and enjoys 4/3 bayonet lenses such as Panasonic and Oba. Due to the massive loss of old Kodak's technicians, Kodak is not the Kodak of the past, and there is no special bright spot except the brand effect left by Kodak.

15, Xiaomi. Xiaomi micro-ant, equipped with a 4/3 inch 20 megapixel sensor developed by Sony, enjoys 4/3 bayonet lenses such as Panasonic and Oba. The highlight of Xiaomi micro-single is the only domestic brand at present. If you want to support domestic products, don't say shortcomings;

16. The landlord can choose Hasselblad X 1D or Fuji GFX for local tyrants, Sony A7RM2 for the rich, Fuji XT2 for the well-off people, Canon EOSM5 for many photographers, 4/3 system micro-single for portable users, Sony A6500 for shooting videos, Panasonic GH5 for playing videos, and Xiaomi for patriotic youth.