Sci*** and the first author have no influence on reading PhD. In general, the * * * of sci is the same as that of the first author, that is to say, the two first authors have the same contribution to this article, and they can't distinguish the order, so it is the same as that of the first author, that is to say, the two authors have the same ability to judge the doctoral research ability and regard such an article as having the same ability, so it does not affect the reading of doctoral students.
Regarding your SCI area, if you are the first author or correspondent, that's good. If you are the third author, your influence will be much less. In addition, regarding invention patents, the more prestigious schools read articles, the less they look down on patents. The reason is that as long as you know about patents, you will know that many patents are false, because patent examination is very simple, that is, it must conform to three innovations, especially novelty. As for the theoretical value or practical value of the results, the Patent Office does not care. Patents have been fooled by third-rate schools, but they can still be used as auxiliary abilities and achievements. So, register according to your own situation and prepare for the exam. If necessary, it will be helpful to contact your favorite tutor directly in advance to see the exam results.