Some of your words impressed me a little.
Do you mean the wording on the side of the product: PONG CADDY? In the patent application, Caddypong.com.If increased the cost of prototyping, which can be omitted.
You mean the word beside the product: pong caddy? Patents, patents, which increase the cost of Caddypong.com.If prototype.
I found this price a bit shocking, because I had spent about $300 to complete all three SLA prototypes.
I think the price is a bit shocking. I once spent about $300 to prototype all three parts of second language acquisition.
The main body is made into two halves, and then bonded at the joint for prototyping. The material is not polypropylene, but a general material for prototyping.
The main body is made of two halves and then welded and bonded, but there is no common polypropylene material as the prototype.
Does this explain the price difference, because if so, I can choose a cheaper route?
Does this explain the price difference, because if so, I can take the cheap route?
If I find an acceptable O-ring (closed ring), I may not need to make the plastic parts of the prototype again, but I want to compare the prototypes.
I may not need to make an acceptable O-ring for the prototype plastic parts, but I want to compare it with the prototype.
My main concern is that I will pay about $35,000 for my 5,000 products, and it will not be available when it arrives.
My biggest worry is that I will pay about $35,000 for 5,000 products, and it will not work when it arrives.
I need a sample of my final product before I start spending so much money.
It took me so much money to start. I need a sample. The final product will be me.
As for the O-ring, I think I need one, because the molding tolerance does not allow me to ensure the tight cap fit of each manufacturing unit.
For O-rings, I think I need one, because the tolerance is+/-molding will not allow me to ensure that a comfortable hat is suitable for each body manufacturing unit.
It looks like 0.005 inch, which I believe is the achievable tolerance of my product molding, and it will make the bottle cap too loose, completely fit or not fit at all.
This seems to be a kind of tolerance. "This is what I think tolerance can achieve. Hats that vary greatly are either too loose, completely fit or inappropriate.
I think the tolerance problem can be solved by leaving some gaps between parts and filling the gaps with compressible rubber rings.
I think I will take care of the tolerance to the sensitive chess pieces and fill this market vacancy with a rubber ring that can compress the gap.
The fit between the cover and the main body requires only a low closing force, such as at least 5 pounds of pressure, and does not need to be waterproof.
A healthy hat only needs a low closing force, at least 5 pounds of pressure, and does not need to be waterproof.