Other information:
Currently, our country does not officially rank universities, but conducts grade evaluations on the disciplines of each university. Currently, four rounds of discipline evaluations have been completed in one ***. In the last round of "double first-class" evaluation, many schools relied on A+ subjects to be selected into the list of my country's "double first-class" universities. This shows that the fifth round of subject evaluation is particularly important for every university. In addition, our country is currently also The second round of "double first-class" evaluation is underway. Many schools hope to enter the double first-class list. After all, the number of colleges and universities in my country has reached more than 3,000, while the number of double-first-class colleges and universities is only more than 100. If the fifth round of subject evaluation is currently underway, Excellent evaluation performance will also increase the probability of entering the double first-class list. So what are the indicators for subject evaluation? Just recently, the Ministry of Education announced the fifth round of subject evaluation work plan. The program focuses on multi-evaluation and adopts a multi-dimensional approach. Teachers should be evaluated not only based on academic qualifications and professional titles, but also without setting talent "hat" indicators, and avoid the practice of one-sided evaluation of academic level based on academic titles. Evaluating the level of scientific research is not limited to papers and awards, but also sets indicators such as "representative academic works", "patent transformation" and "new drug research and development" to conduct multi-dimensional evaluation of scientific research effectiveness. The evaluation of academic papers focuses on iconic academic achievements, using the "representative evaluation" method of "combining quantitative evaluation with expert evaluation" and "combining Chinese journals with foreign journals", downplaying the number of included papers and citation rates, and not including SCI and ESI related indicators. As a direct basis for judgment, it is stipulated that representative works must contain a certain proportion of Chinese journal articles, highlighting the innovative quality and academic contribution of iconic academic achievements. Make full use of the expert fusion evaluation method based on quantitative data and objective evidence, and adhere to the combination of expert evaluation of representative results and high-level quantitative evaluation of results.