What is the substantive examination result of the invention patent application?

People's Republic of China (PRC) Patent Law (Second Revision on August 25th, 2000) Article 37 If the patent administration department in the State Council considers that the application for a patent for invention is not in conformity with the provisions of this Law after substantive examination, it shall notify the applicant and ask him to state his opinions or amend his application within a specified time limit; If no reply is made within the time limit without justifiable reasons, the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn. Article 38 If an application for a patent for invention is still not in conformity with the provisions of this Law after the applicant has stated his opinions or made amendments, it shall be rejected. Article 39 If the application for a patent for invention is not found to be rejected after substantive examination, the administrative department for patent in the State Council shall make a decision to grant a patent right for invention, issue a patent certificate for invention, and register and announce it at the same time. The invention patent right shall take effect as of the date of announcement. Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Patent Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) (revised and promulgated by the State Council on February 28, 2002) Article 42 Where an application for a patent includes two or more inventions, utility models or designs, the applicant may file a divisional application with the patent administration department of the State Council before the expiration of the time limit specified in the first paragraph of Article 54 of these Rules; However, if the patent application has been rejected, withdrawn or regarded as withdrawn, a divisional application cannot be filed. Where the administrative department for patent in the State Council considers that the patent application does not conform to the provisions of Article 31 of the Patent Law and Article 35 or Article 36 of these Rules, it shall notify the applicant to amend its application within a specified time limit; If the applicant fails to reply within the time limit, the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn. The divisional application shall not change the category of the original application. Article 53 According to the provisions of Article 38 of the Patent Law, the circumstances in which an application for a patent for invention should be rejected after substantive examination refer to: (1) the application does not conform to the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 2 of these Rules; (2) The application falls within the provisions of Articles 5 and 25 of the Patent Law, or does not conform to the provisions of Article 22 of the Patent Law, Paragraph 1 of Article 13, Paragraph 1 of Article 20 and Paragraph 2 of Article 21 of these Rules, or the patent right cannot be obtained according to the provisions of Article 9 of the Patent Law; (3) The application does not conform to the provisions of Paragraph 3 or Paragraph 4 of Article 26 or Paragraph 1 of Article 31 of the Patent Law; (4) The amendment of the application does not conform to the provisions of Article 33 of the Patent Law, or the divisional application does not conform to the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 43 of these Rules.