Legal analysis: 1. Contingency agency cases are generally suitable for cases with relatively large disputes, especially cases with relatively difficult enforcement. Does the subject’s patent infringement case involve enforcement difficulties, or does the subject himself have any There is no certainty that there is no infringement, and there is a big controversy. 2. The agency results are closely related to the lawyer’s remuneration and investment recovery, so the fee ratio should be cautious. Since the subject hopes that through risk agency, the lawyers handling the case will have to strengthen their sense of responsibility, they should also consider their own ability to bear the lawyer's remuneration. 3. Trust in the lawyer handling the case. In a risk agency, the lawyer has relatively greater authority to dispose of the substantive rights and interests of the case. Therefore, the subject owner should consider the lawyer's reputation and the consequences he can bear.
Legal basis: "Measures for the Administration of Lawyer Service Charges"
Article 11: When handling civil cases involving property relations, the client still requires risk agency even after being informed of the government's guidance price , law firms may implement contingency fees, except in the following circumstances: (1) marriage and inheritance cases; (2) requests for social insurance benefits or minimum living security benefits; (3) requests for payment of alimony, child support, Support payments, pensions, relief funds, work-related injury compensation; (4) Requests for payment of labor remuneration, etc.
Article 12 It is prohibited to implement contingency fees in criminal litigation cases, administrative litigation cases, state compensation cases and group litigation cases.
Article 13 To implement contingency agency fees, the law firm shall sign a contingency agency fee contract with the client to stipulate the risk responsibilities, charging methods, fee amounts or proportions that both parties shall bear. Risk agency charges are implemented, and the maximum charge amount shall not be higher than 30% of the subject amount agreed in the charge contract.