Private enterprises themselves are relatively useful and novel without certain technology, but private enterprises themselves have no strength, which is reflected in the amount of funds and channel marketing, and no one can do it. You may soon start to bear the burden if you just have a technology, because people who have done it earlier in the industry have better resources in all aspects than a fledgling small company. Therefore, the acquisition of such companies by state-owned enterprises takes a fancy to such technology. If there is no key technology and useful technology, why should state-owned enterprises spend so much time, energy and even money to acquire an ordinary private enterprise?
Therefore, this technology can be completely enjoyed and can be done. This is just a small change. Theoretically, even if a company is controlled by a major shareholder, the technology of that company can not be directly enjoyed by * * * *, but can be enjoyed through internal transactions, which is equivalent to playing with your right hand with your left hand. You are a major shareholder. You told a company in the group to enjoy this technology. This operation is not that difficult. Many shareholders are well aware that it is your technology that people in this society want to buy this enterprise. What is the difference? This problem is easy to solve.
Patented technology may look valuable now, but it may not be valuable in three to five years. At present, the speed of technological upgrading is so fast. The protection period of a technology patent is 10 year, so it can be guaranteed that this thing is really so valuable after 10 year. Can you have this technology that others can't develop? Can't use the same family as you, can't you change? Although there is patent protection, it is impossible to 100% protection, so it is the key to seize the market in the early stage.