1, by:
The person who is mainly responsible for writing research papers or reports, and who makes the greatest contribution to the whole research process. * * * Other researchers who have made important contributions to the research together with the author. They should review the research results and ensure that the content is accurate.
2. Leader/Mentor:
If the research project is conducted in a laboratory or team, the team leader or tutor should review the research results to ensure the quality and accuracy.
3. Lab/team members:
Other members in the research process, including experimental technicians, research assistants, etc. They should review the methods, data and results involved to ensure their reliability and consistency.
4. External reviewers:
According to the requirements of academic journals or conferences, research results may need to be reviewed by external experts. These reviewers will evaluate the paper and make suggestions or opinions.
All reviewers should carefully review the research results to ensure that the content is accurate, reasonable and meaningful. Its purpose is to ensure the quality and credibility of research and prevent the dissemination of wrong or inaccurate information.
Cooperative research results refer to the results or achievements of research projects jointly completed by multiple researchers or teams. It can include scientific papers, academic research reports, scientific and technological patents, innovative technologies or product development.
Collaborative research results represent the joint efforts and contributions of many individuals or teams, and usually have important value and influence in academic and scientific research fields. Through cooperative research, researchers can share resources, knowledge and technology and strengthen cooperation, thus promoting scientific progress and innovative development.
The role of reviewers is to improve the quality of research results, correct possible errors or inaccuracies, and ensure that the results meet academic, scientific and technical standards. Their comments and suggestions are very important for revising and improving the cooperative research results.