English reading comprehension requires certain skills to get higher scores. The following are my common English reading comprehension skills. Welcome to read!
1, identification
When inferring, learning, hinting, summarizing, suggesting, instructing, etc. Appearing in the stem of the question, the question can basically be judged as a reasoning question.
Step 2 classify
According to the different situations of reasoning problems, we can divide them into different categories:
① Detailed reasoning: The stem contains specific positioning information. At this time, it is almost the same as a detailed question, and sometimes it is simpler than a detailed question.
(2) paragraph reasoning: the stem contains specific paragraph numbers (find positioning information from four options or often find problem points in the original text).
(3) Full-text reasoning: the stem contains subject words or has no positioning information (find positioning information from four options, or follow the principle of order).
3. The principle of solving problems
According to the actual decomposition of reasoning problems, the following principles should be adhered to when solving problems:
The theme is greater than the details, and the viewpoint is greater than the argument;
② Reasoning must have original arguments;
③ Pay attention to the turning point.
4, often test questions.
After carefully analyzing the real questions over the years, Teacher Du Wen found that the essence of reasoning questions is a synonymous rewriting, and reasoning is usually positive and negative reasoning and induction. The questions often tested in the postgraduate entrance examination usually have the following characteristics:
(1) The first and last sentences, topic sentences and viewpoint sentences of the paragraph;
② Details closely related to the theme;
③ turning point;
④ Emphasis or progressive relationship.
For details, let's look at the text 2 of 20 10.
29. From the last two paragraphs, we know that the business method patent is _ _ _ _ _.
[A] Immunity to legal challenges.
It is usually unnecessary.
C. reduce respect for patent holders.
D. increase the incidence of risks.
What can we infer from the last two paragraphs? First, let's locate it.
(4) The Bilsky case involves a patent on the method of hedging risks in the energy market. The Federal Circuit Court issued an unusual order, saying that the case would be tried by all 12 judges of the court, instead of the typical three-person panel, and one question that the court wanted to evaluate was whether it should "reconsider" its ruling on State Street Bank.
⑤ The action of the Federal Circuit Court is after the Supreme Court made a series of decisions recently, which narrowed the scope of protection for private tent holders. For example, in April last year, the Chief Justice said that too many patents were supported by obvious "inventions". Harold C. Wegner, a patent lawyer and professor at George Washington University Law School, said that judges of the Federal Circuit Court "are responding to the anti-patent trend of the Supreme Court".
According to the second sentence of paragraph 5, last April, the judge said that many obvious inventions were awarded. The implication is that unnecessary patent issues are often granted. Options A, C and D are not correct answers. If you choose C and Option A, the patent issue will not be affected by the law. The article mentioned that legal challenges are likely to change the future of patents. Option C is an option made out of nothing, which is not proposed in this paper. Option d is not to increase the probability of risk, but to avoid risk.
;