Trial Measures for the Comprehensive Quality Assessment of Undergraduate Students of Wuhan University
Chapter 1 General Provisions
Article 1 In order to fully implement the party’s education policy, encourage students to strive for excellence, Develop specialties, pioneer and innovate, guide students to coordinate the development of knowledge, abilities, and qualities, and cultivate high-quality innovative talents who adapt to the requirements of socialist modernization. These measures are specially formulated based on the training objectives of colleges and universities and the actual situation of our school.
Article 2 The comprehensive assessment of student quality is the measurement and evaluation of students’ performance in all aspects during school. The set evaluation indicators are not only the basic basis for evaluating students, but also the guiding goal for student development.
Article 3 The comprehensive assessment of student quality should adhere to the principles of fairness, impartiality and openness, and adopt a combination of quantitative assessment and qualitative assessment, a combination of process assessment and result assessment, and a combination of recorded assessment and democratic evaluation. method, reflecting the actual quality of students as scientifically and reasonably as possible.
Article 4 The comprehensive assessment of student quality mainly includes three parts: basic quality, course learning performance, and practical and innovative abilities.
Article 5 All ordinary undergraduates and second-bachelor degree students who are registered in our school and participate in full-time study activities shall be based on these regulations in units of classes (or the same grade and the same major, the same below) Take an assessment.
Article 6 The comprehensive assessment of student quality is calculated based on the academic year. Under the leadership of the college (or directly affiliated department, the same below), the students themselves will first conduct a summary and self-evaluation to calculate the scores. After evaluation and verification by the class evaluation team composed of class instructors, Youth League branch and class committee cadres, and student representatives, Report to the college for review. The evaluation results serve as the basic basis for award evaluation.
Chapter 2 Basic Quality Assessment
Article 7 Basic Quality refers to the characteristics that students should have in terms of political attitudes, ideological concepts, moral qualities, humanistic accomplishments, physical and mental health, etc. that are in line with the times. The basic quality of characteristics is a comprehensive reflection of students’ world outlook, outlook on life, values, moral values ??and behavioral performance.
Article 8 The basic content and basic requirements of basic quality assessment:
(1) Political attitude (A1). It mainly examines political stance, ideals and beliefs, and performance in participating in political activities. Basic requirements: love the socialist motherland, follow the four basic principles established in the Constitution, adhere to the correct political direction, support the party's line, principles and policies, and be politically motivated; consciously study Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought, Deng Xiaoping Theory and the "Three "Representative" important thought, care about current affairs, actively participate in various political studies and activities, and consciously strengthen political cultivation. Those who have words and deeds that violate the basic principles established by the Constitution and persist in not changing them should be assessed as poor.
(2) Concept of law and discipline (A2). It mainly examines compliance with laws and regulations and their behavioral performance. Basic requirements: Consciously abide by national laws, regulations and school rules and regulations, and have no violations of laws and disciplines. Those who violate national laws and regulations and are punished by relevant state agencies, or those who violate school disciplines and rules and are punished by the school should be assessed as poor.
(3) Learning attitude (A3). It mainly examines the attitude and style of study towards course study. Basic requirements: have a correct learning attitude, abide by learning disciplines, be humble and eager to learn, work hard and conscientiously, and establish a good study style while striving to complete various learning tasks. Those who do not seek progress in their studies, violate study disciplines, often skip classes or arrive late and leave early, fail to complete homework on time or engage in fraud should be assessed as poor.
(4) Collective concept (A4). It mainly examines the daily performance of words and deeds in various groups or organizations. Basic requirements: take the overall situation into consideration, have a spirit of unity and cooperation, care about the collective, actively participate in various collective activities, safeguard collective honor, subordinate personal interests to collective interests, and do not do anything that harms collective interests. Those who have a weak concept of the collective, care about personal gains and losses, and seriously harm the interests of the collective and others should be rated as poor.
(5) Life attitude (A5). Mainly examine labor concepts and life style. Basic requirements: love labor, actively participate in production internships, public welfare labor and work-study activities, consciously improve dormitory hygiene; carry forward the spirit of hard work, live frugally, do not waste food, save water and electricity, and do not ask for transcendence from the school and family Practical possible life requirements. Those who are afraid of hardship and tiredness, are unwilling to participate in labor, have always poor dormitory hygiene, or have always lived an extravagant and wasteful life should be rated as poor.
(6) Social ethics (A6). It mainly examines the moral behavior in dealing with group-self relations and in public places. Basic requirements: abide by the management regulations of public places, including campuses and student apartments (dormitories), and consciously maintain public order and social ethics; behave politely and politely in public places; care for public property and protect public places. **facility. Those who do not respect social ethics, do not abide by public order and teaching order, often affect other people's normal work, study and rest, deliberately damage public property, or otherwise violate social ethics and cause adverse effects, should be assessed as poor.
(7) Personal moral character (A7). It mainly examines the moral behavior in dealing with interpersonal relationships and interpersonal interactions, as well as personal moral cultivation in daily life. Basic requirements: Honesty and trustworthiness, modesty and prudence, integrity, and fairness; respecting the elderly and the young, respecting teachers, uniting classmates, and being willing to help others; neatly dressed, hygienic, and well-behaved. Those who do not pay attention to personal moral cultivation, are not honest, are conceited and hypocritical, are selfish, have vulgar speech and behavior, and have bad conduct should be evaluated as poor.
(8) Humanistic cultivation (A8). It mainly examines cultural and artistic accomplishments, aesthetic tastes, and attitudes and spirits that care about society outside of professional courses. Basic requirements: Understand basic common sense in literature, history, philosophy, art and natural science, have scientific thinking methods, have strong oral and written expression skills and aesthetic ability, have an elegant taste in life and noble spiritual pursuits.
(9) Physical fitness (A9). It mainly examines sports performance and participation in physical exercise and military training. Basic requirements: Consciously exercise, and pass the sports standards; actively participate in extracurricular physical exercises and sports competitions, complete military training tasks, and have a healthy body. Those who fail to meet the sports standards or who should participate in military training but cannot complete military training tasks should be assessed as poor.
(10) Mental health (A10). It mainly examines life adaptability and psychological performance and psychological adjustment ability when facing difficulties and setbacks. Basic requirements: Have basic knowledge of mental health, be cheerful, emotionally stable, optimistic, and have harmonious interpersonal relationships; have strong life adaptability and psychological adjustment ability, and be able to correctly deal with difficulties and setbacks.
Article 9: The assessment of the basic content of basic qualities shall adopt the method of democratic evaluation. Under the leadership of the college, the class assessment team will conduct assessments one by one based on the basic content and requirements of the basic quality assessment and based on the actual situation of the educational links, extracurricular activities, daily performance, quality status, etc. that the students participated in (see Table 1). The evaluation results are divided into five levels: excellent, good, average, poor, and poor, which are converted into 5 points, 4 points, 3 points, 2 points, and 1 point respectively. The arithmetic mean of the sum of the evaluation scores of a certain student by the evaluation team is the evaluation score (denoted as P) of the student’s basic quality. The calculation formula is:
Among them, Aij represents the evaluation team members’ evaluation of a certain student. A student’s score on a certain aspect of basic quality, n represents the number of people participating in the assessment group.
Table 1: Basic Quality Evaluation Form
Evaluation Items
School Name
Number
Political Attitude A1
Legal and discipline concept A2
Learning attitude A3
Collective concept A4
Life attitude A5
Social ethics A6
Personal Morality A7
Humanistic A8
Physical Fitness A9
Mental Health A10
Total Score< /p>
Note: The evaluation grades are excellent, good, average, poor, and poor, and the corresponding scores are 5 points, 4 points, 3 points, 2 points, and 1 point respectively.
Total score=A1+A2+......A10.
Article 10 Bonus points (A11). For advanced collectives, advanced individuals or good people and good deeds that have achieved outstanding achievements and are commended, points will be added according to the following items. However, if you receive different honorary titles or commendations or commendations for the same reason, only the highest score will be counted, and the points will not be accumulated.
(1) For those who have acted bravely and sacrificed themselves to save others (with certified deeds or written proof), 4 points will be added;
(2) Those who have provided assistance to the disabled Those who are weak, do not know how to collect money, donate blood for free, etc. (with recognized deed materials or written proof), will receive 2 points; Those who are commended and awarded honorary titles by organizations (departments) or above, or who are commended by schools, colleges (departments), will receive additional points according to Table 2:
Table 2: Advanced Collective Rating
National Commendation
Provincial Commendation
School Commendation
College Commendation
School and College Commendation
Main student leaders
10
8
6
3
1.5
Other student leaders
8
6
4
2
1
Members
5
3
2
1
0.5
(four ) Advanced individuals who have achieved outstanding achievements and have been commended by organizations above the college (department) (such as outstanding Communist Party members, outstanding Communist Youth League members, outstanding League cadres, outstanding student cadres, etc.), excluding three good students selected according to these methods, Outstanding students, etc., as well as student unions and student organizations to commend their members), add points according to Table 3:
Table 3: Advanced Individual Rating
National Commendation
Provincial Commendation
School Commendation
College Commendation
10
8
5
p>2
Article 11 Penalty Points Deduction (A12). Those who violate school rules and regulations and are punished or notified of criticism, or those who must participate but do not participate in teaching and group activities without reason (except for those who have legitimate reasons and ask for leave), points may be deducted according to Table 4:
Table 4: Punishment and deduction of points
Detention and probation
Demerit sanction
Serious warning sanction
Warning sanction
School , the hospital informed and criticized
Failure to participate in teaching and group activities without reason
15
10
7
p>5
2 points/time
1 point/time
Article 12 The total score of basic quality (recorded as F1) is the evaluation The sum of the score (P) and the bonus points (A11) minus the penalty points (A12) is calculated as:
Among them, Aij and n have the same meaning as Article 9.
Chapter 3 Course Learning Achievements Evaluation
Article 13 Course Learning Achievement refers to the students’ participation in the compulsory courses, elective courses and minor courses stipulated in the professional teaching plan. Assessment results. The performance evaluation is based on a hundred-point system. A score of 60 or above is considered a pass. Only those who pass can obtain credits for the course. If the course score is assessed as excellent, good, medium, passing, or failing, it will be converted into 95, 85, 75, 65, and 50 points respectively.
Article 14 Course learning performance evaluation is calculated using the method of separate evaluation and scoring of compulsory courses, limited (referential) elective courses, optional courses, and minor courses. The calculation formula is:
(1) Scores of required courses and elective courses only
Among them, X1i represents the scores of each required course and elective courses included in the assessment, and Y1i represents the credits of the corresponding courses. m is the required courses included in the assessment and the total number of limited (referring to) elective courses.
(2) Scores of optional courses and minor courses
Among them, X2j represents the scores of each optional course and minor course included in the assessment, Y2j represents the credits of the corresponding courses, n It is the total number of elective courses and minor courses included in the assessment.
(3) The total score of course learning performance (recorded as F2): F2=B1+B2
Article 15 The course learning performance evaluation is based on the class and is conducted on an academic year basis. calculate.
Each college can formulate scientific course evaluation scope and score correction methods based on its own subject characteristics and curriculum conditions. The performance evaluation methods for students in medical majors such as School of Medicine and School of Stomatology during the internship period shall be formulated by the relevant schools.
Chapter 4 Assessment of Practical and Innovation Ability
Article 16 Practical and innovative ability refers to the innovative qualities and innovative qualities displayed by students in study, work, science and technology and social activities. The ability to use the knowledge acquired to analyze and solve practical problems is mainly examined to examine students' achievements in science and technology academics, social work, literature and art, cultural and sports competitions and other practical activities.
Article 17 The main content and scoring of practical and innovative ability assessment:
(1) Published works (C1). Those who publish academic, literary, artistic and other works publicly will receive additional points according to Table 5. Different works can be scored cumulatively, and co-authors are scored according to the actual workload undertaken by the author.
Table 5: Rating of published works
Solo (co) author
Chief (co-editor) editor
More than 100,000 words
Less than 100,000 words
More than 100,000 words
More than 50,000 words
More than 10,000 words
Less than 10,000 words
Academic works
15
3—10
10
7
4
p>3
Literary, artistic and other works
12
2—8
8
5
3
2
(2) Publish academic papers (C2). Those who publish scientific and technological academic papers will receive additional points according to Table 6. All paper bonus points should be certified by publications or acceptance notices. Different papers are scored cumulatively based on the number of articles; reprinted papers are scored according to the highest-level publication reprinted; the first two authors of collective collaborative papers are awarded full points according to the corresponding items, and other authors are awarded points according to the corresponding items. The points for corresponding items will be reduced by half. The publication level is determined by the college in accordance with relevant national and school regulations.
Table 6: Ratings for published academic papers
SCI, SSCI, EI, ISTP papers
National authoritative journals
National core journals< /p>
Publicly released academic journals
Published collections of academic papers
Legal internal academic journals
15
12
8
5
3
1
(3) Scientific research results and technological inventions (C3 ). Those who participate in scientific research and science and technology academic activities, obtain awards or pass appraisals for scientific research results, or obtain invention patents will receive additional points according to Table 7. Different results can be scored cumulatively, and the same result will receive different levels of rewards. Only the highest score will be counted, and there will be no accumulation. The top three authors of collective collaboration results will receive full points for the corresponding items, and other authors will receive half of the points for the corresponding items. The achievement award or appraisal grade will be determined by the college in accordance with relevant regulations.
Table 7: Rating of scientific research achievements and scientific and technological inventions
Grade
National level
Provincial and ministerial level
Provincial government departments, municipal level
School level
College student science and technology activities
National
Provincial and municipal level
< p> School levelWon
Awards
Achievements
Achievements
One
20
12
9
7
10
8
5
Two
18
10
7
6
8
p>6
4
Three
14
8
6
5
6
5
3
Four
10
4
3
2
Identification results
10
8
6
5
Invention achievements
10 points will be added for each item awarded a national invention patent
(4) Subject and cultural and sports competitions (C4 ). Those who win prizes in subject competitions and cultural and sports competitions will receive additional points according to Table 8. Winning points for different projects can be accumulated. If the same project wins awards at different levels, only the highest score will be counted and will not be accumulated. If a team competition wins a prize, the person who plays a major role in it will be awarded full points according to the corresponding item. Those who play a minor role will be deducted according to the corresponding item. Half points.
Table 8: Scoring of subject and cultural and sports competitions
Ranking
Award level
International competition
National competition
Provincial (municipal) level competition
School level competition
College level competition
1
1< /p>
12
10
7
5
2
1—4< /p>
Two
10
8
5
4
1.5
5—8
Three
8
6
4
3
1
Encouragement Award
5
4
3
2
0.5
(5) Social work (C5). Those who serve as student leaders and perform their job responsibilities will receive additional points according to Table 9. Among them, those who serve as student cadres in departments, grades, classes and department student associations will be awarded points by each college based on their responsibilities, work performance and achievements; those who serve in the school youth league committee, school student union, school-wide student associations and other units of the school For students who serve as student cadres (such as school newspapers, radio stations, cable TV stations, student affairs assistants, etc.), the supervisory unit of the organization where they serve will propose bonus points based on their responsibilities and work performance. . Those who have served as student cadres for less than one semester will not be scored; those who do not perform their job responsibilities and have no performance will be scored 0 points; those who hold multiple positions concurrently will be scored based on one item that can obtain a higher score or a comprehensive assessment, and there will be no cumulative calculation. point. This additional score must be reviewed and approved by the college, and the maximum score shall not exceed 10 points.
Table 9: Social Work Rating
Job Responsibilities
Performance
Member of the Presidium of the School Student Union, Deputy Secretary of the Youth League Committee, and Student Union of the School Chairman
The Youth League Committee of the school, various departments of the Student Union, members of the Presidium of the Student Union of the college, student leaders of the student party branch
Student leaders of the Youth League Committee of the college, various departments of the Student Union, and student leaders of grades and classes
Student leaders of other units
Student leaders of student clubs
Main
cadres
Others
< p>CadresMain
Cadres
Others
Cadres
Main
Cadres
Others
Cadres
Main
Cadres
Others
Cadres< /p>
Better
8-10
6-8
3
5-7
3
5—8
3
3—5
2
General
p>4—6
3—4
2
2—4
2
2—4
2
2—3
1
Poor
0—2< /p>
0—1
0
0—1
0
0—1
< p> 00—1
0
(6) Social activities (C6). Those who actively participate in public welfare activities, production internships, social practice activities and other social activities, and are rated as advanced collectives, advanced individuals or activists at the hospital level or above, or those who have won awards for writing social survey reports, social practice reports, etc., will be added to Table 10. point. Those who receive commendations at different levels for the same deeds will be awarded points based on the high-level commendations and will not be scored repeatedly. The cumulative bonus points for this item shall not exceed 10 points.
Table 10: Social activity scores
National level
Provincial (municipal) level
School level
Hospital Level
Advanced Collective
Person in Charge
7
5
3
1
Members
4
3
1
0.5
Advanced Individual, activist
7
5
3
1
Award-winning for writing investigation reports and practice reports
5—7
3—5
2—3
0.5—1
(Seven) Publish literary, artistic, news and other works (C7). For those who publish literary, artistic, news and other works in legal publications and media (except online media), points will be added as appropriate according to Table 11 based on the quality of the work. All bonus points for works should be certified by publications or acceptance notices. Different works can be scored cumulatively. If the same work is published or reprinted by different publications and media, only the highest score will be counted, and no repeated points will be scored. The first author of collective collaborative works shall be scored accordingly. Each entry will be awarded full marks, and other authors will receive half points for the corresponding items. The cumulative bonus points for this item shall not exceed 10 points. Schools such as the School of Humanities and the School of Journalism and Communication can develop additional scoring standards based on the characteristics of the school.
Table 11: Ratings for published literary, artistic, news and other works
National authoritative newspapers or news media
Important provincial newspapers
< p>Or news mediaOther publicly distributed newspapers or local news media, publicly distributed newspapers and periodicals sponsored by the school
Other newspapers or media sponsored by the school
Internal publications sponsored by the college
4—5
2—3
1—2
0.5 —1
0—0.5
(8) Foreign language level (C8). Those who have passed the National College English Test Band 4 or 6 or obtained a certificate of excellence will receive additional points according to Table 12. Those who have obtained national examination certificates for foreign languages ??other than English will receive additional points as appropriate based on this scoring standard.
Table 12: Foreign language proficiency score
CET-4 passed
CET-4 excellent
CET-6 passed
Passed the English speaking test
1
2
3
2
(9) Computer proficiency (C9). Those who have obtained the National Computer Proficiency Examination Certificate will receive additional points according to Table 13.
Table 13: Computer proficiency rating
Level 1 (beginner)
Level 2 (intermediate)
Level 3 (advanced)
Obtain the proficiency examination certificate
1
2
3
Obtain the programmer examination certificate
2
3
4
Article 18 The practice and innovation ability assessment adopts the method of recording bonus points, and the points are accumulated by This accumulated total score is the total score of practice and innovation ability (recorded as F3), and its calculation formula is:
Where, Ci represents the score value of each assessment item.
Article 19: The assessment of practical and innovative abilities is calculated based on the academic year. Practice and innovation achievements should generally be provided by the students themselves with supporting materials and self-evaluation to calculate the scores. After verification and scoring by the class evaluation team, they should be reported to the college for review. If necessary, the college will verify the evaluation and make the final decision at its discretion.
Article 20: Anyone who commits fraud or falsely reports results in the assessment of practical and innovative abilities will have his/her score deducted after verification and may be deemed to have failed the basic quality assessment.
Chapter 5 Assessment Results and Application
Article 21 The final result of the comprehensive assessment of student quality in each academic year (recorded as F) is the overall assessment score of basic quality, course learning performance The weighted sum of the overall evaluation score and the overall evaluation score of practice and innovation ability is calculated as follows:
F=F1×15%+F2×60%+F3×25%
No. After the twenty-two assessment results are reviewed by the college, they will be announced in this assessment unit. If there is any objection, the college will make a decision after verification within one week.
Article 23 The evaluation results reflect the relative level of students’ comprehensive quality and serve as the basis for the following work:
(1) The basic basis for evaluating various scholarships;
p>
(2) The basic basis for selecting advanced individual honorary titles such as outstanding students, three-good students, three-good student models, outstanding graduates, etc.;
(3) Selecting advanced class collectives and advanced class collective models and other advanced collective honorary titles;
(4) One of the basis for examining student aid projects such as applications for hardship subsidies and tuition exemptions;
(5) Graduation One of the basic basis for recommending students for employment and communicating with students’ parents;
(6) Reference basis for recommending postgraduate students exempt from examination.