Remarks: (When the measurement standard is lowered, the highest score will be reduced to the score of the project, that is, no score will be scored if the project is not completed).
Financial budget and execution management
Indicator interpretation: refers to an assessment method that evaluates the accuracy and timeliness of the financial budget plan prepared by the assessed department and assesses the completion and implementation of the financial budget plan according to the requirements of refined management.
Source of data: Asset Finance Department of the Company is responsible for the assessment of each division; The planning and investment department is responsible for the assessment of the asset finance department. All kinds of assessment data should be submitted to the Human Resources Department within 8 days after the reporting period.
Purpose of assessment: Through the assessment of this index, we will strengthen refined management and ensure the full completion of the financial budget plan.
Measurement:
1) If the financial budget plan (financial budget data) is not submitted (provided) within the specified time limit, 0.5 point will be deducted each time.
1) Deduct 1.0 for failing to report the financial budget plan and its implementation within the specified time limit.
2) If there is an error in the financial budget plan (financial budget data), subtract 0.5 points.
2) Every time there is an error in the planning and implementation of the financial budget, subtract 0.5 points.
3) If the financial budget analysis report is not provided on time or the analysis is unrealistic, minus 1 point.
3) Failing to provide various financial information on time (explicitly required by the Finance Department), 2.0 points will be deducted.
4) The cumulative completion rate of various financial budget plans in the current month is less than 1, minus 1-3 points.
(Note: Cumulative completion rate of various financial budget plans = after-tax profit completion rate ×50%+ sales revenue completion rate ×30%+ collection plan completion rate reaching the standard × 20%); The cumulative completion rate of various financial budget plans in the current month is greater than or equal to 1)
(Note: Cumulative completion rate of various financial budget plans = after-tax profit completion rate ×66.6%+ accounts receivable control rate ×20%+ inventory control rate ×6.7%+ sales revenue completion rate ×6.7%)
5) If the accuracy of budget planning is below 85%, subtract 1-3 points.
The accuracy of implementation summary is below 95%, minus 1-3 points.
Technical quality management
Interpretation of indicators: it refers to the requirements of selecting new product projects, development management, internal quality management system operation management, product quality indicators, quality cost management and so on. According to the technical quality management characteristics of each assessed department, check the progress of new product development projects of the assessed department according to the requirements of the task book; The method of assessing the product quality of the assessed department through spot check and statistical analysis to reflect the new product development, project management level and product quality.
Data source: Technical Quality Department of the Company is responsible for the assessment of each division. All kinds of assessment data should be submitted to the Human Resources Department within 7 days after the end of the reporting period.
Assessment purpose: Through the assessment of this index, strengthen the process management of new product development projects, and ensure that the new product development projects are completed on time with good quality, the technical management data are filed in a standardized way, the product quality meets the requirements of users, and all systems continue to operate normally.
Measurement standard (according to the characteristics of each department, different detailed assessment items are put forward. For specific assessment items, please refer to the Management Responsibility Letter "Detailed Assessment Table of KPI Assessment Indicators of Each Division in 2007", and the deduction shall not exceed the weight score of the item at most).
Every 1 new product project is not completed, minus 1.0 points.
If the progress of new product development is not timely, 0.5 point will be deducted for each delayed 10 working day.
New product development data management is chaotic, and the data is incomplete, minus 2.0 points.
1 point will be deducted for each item with less assessment indicators.
Incomplete 1 work registration assessment index, minus 0.5 points.
If the qualified rate of standardized spot check of product technical documents is lower than the assessment standard, it shall be reduced.
From the talent list.