SF discloses patents related to violent sorting and identification methods. Can this technology effectively reduce violent sorters?

Now online shopping can be said to be very convenient, and the express delivery industry is developing rapidly. However, the problem of violent sorting has always existed. Even though various express delivery companies have formulated various regulations to prevent this phenomenon, they are still banned repeatedly. The patent of SF's violent sorting identification method is aimed at violent sorting personnel. According to its public description, this patent can improve the accuracy of identifying violent sorting. However, although the patent can indeed reduce the phenomenon of violent sorting after full utilization, it still needs to be questioned whether it can effectively reduce the number of violent sorting personnel. After all, there are policies and countermeasures, and the patent does not say that it can accurately identify the phenomenon of violent sorting.

First, there are policies at the top and countermeasures at the bottom.

Although improving the recognition efficiency can reduce the phenomenon of violent sorting to a certain extent, and it can also make the courier company dismiss some violent sorting personnel, the wisdom of people in laziness is often endless. Moreover, to put it bluntly, violent sorting has been repeatedly banned, mainly because supervision is not in place. However, with the current technology, whether it is manual supervision or machine supervision, it is easy to produce loopholes. Therefore, even if the use of patents improves the recognition rate of violent sorting, some employees who like violent sorting are likely to find patent loopholes after a period of silence, thus continuing to be lazy through violent sorting. Especially in the period of a lot of express delivery, it is often the most serious season of violent sorting.

Second, the patent does not accurately identify violent sorting.

This new patent of SF can only improve the accuracy of identifying violent sorting, but it does not mean that it can accurately identify violent sorting. What's more, the word "improvement" is actually a vague word, and it is not clear to what extent it can be improved. In addition, there is no corresponding model for comparison and data support, and it is still unknown whether patents can effectively reduce the occurrence of violent sorting, let alone reduce violent sorting personnel.

Generally speaking, although the patent looks good, what kind of effect it can achieve is still unknown, so it cannot be said that it can reduce violent sorting personnel.