It was adopted at the 1202nd meeting of the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court on December 24, 2018. It is hereby announced and will no longer apply as of December 28, 2001.
>
(The Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court
passed the Judicial Interpretation [2001] No. 32 at its 1202nd meeting on December 24, 2001)
Preface
Name of Judicial Interpretation
Date and number of issuance
Reasons for revocation
1
The Supreme People’s Court’s Notice on the Bequest of Property to Overseas Chinese in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Reply to the issue of whether the Chinese people should be valid
Eastern France on June 14, 1951
No. 2842
has been On April 10, 1985
The National People's Congress has
passed and promulgated the "Law of the People's Republic of China on Succession of the People's Republic of China
p>
》Replace 2
The Supreme People's Court's Notice on Handling Foreign Affairs Cases
If there is no foreign affairs office in the local area, you can contact the nearest provincial or municipal people's government
Foreign Affairs Office Notice of the Legal Supervisor on September 26, 1951 for contact processing
(1) No. 5
The situation has changed and it has actually expired
3
The Central and South Branch of the Supreme People's Court notified the Soviet Union of abolishing the ban on marriage between Soviet citizens and foreigners on June 14, 1954 (54)
p>
The adjustment object of Ban Mi Fa Zi No. 87 has disappeared,
It has actually expired 4
The Supreme People's Court regarding the Polish court's decision on both parties
Reply to the issue of whether the divorce judgment of Chinese expatriates living in Poland
has legal effect in China
Letter
May 4, 1957
Faxingzi No. 8490
Promulgated by the Supreme People's Court on August 13, 1991
Issue [19
91] No. 21 "The Supreme People's Court's Notice on Chinese Citizens' Application for Recognition of Foreign Court Divorce" "Provisions on Judgment Procedure Issues
" instead of 5
The Supreme People's Court's Approval on How Chinese Koreans' Application for Divorce Should be Handled
p>
Revised August 22, 1962 [
62] Faxingzi No. 160
Has been dated February 1, 1994
The "Marriage
Registration Management Regulations" promulgated by the State Council replaces the 6
Supreme People's Court's approval that divorce judgments can be sent directly
to the parties in Hong Kong
February 25, 1963 [
63] Fayanzi No. 21
Has been replaced by March 29, 1999
The highest
Fa Interpretation [1999] No. 9 "
About the Mutual Entrustment of the Courts of the Mainland and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Sent by the People's Court
Judicial Interpretation of the Arrangement of Civil and Commercial Judicial Documents
Replacing 7
The Supreme People’s Court’s statement on the relationship between the requirements of Chinese citizens and
has been Reply to divorce issue for Japanese returning home
July 7, 1964 (64)
Fayanzi No. 64
Has been approved by February 1994 1st
The State Council issued the "Marriage
Registration Management Regulations" on behalf of
8
The Supreme People's Court regarding Li Shufen and Huang Zhengkuan
p>Approval of the divorce case
November 16, 1964 (64)
Minta Zi No. 60
The main content is the same as that of 1994
Released by the State Council on February 1
>
"Marriage Registration Management Regulations
Regulations" are inconsistent with 9
The Supreme People's Court's reply on the divorce issue between Zhu Yuqin and Yamada Ryo
p>July 28, 1978 (78)
Fa Min Zi No. 18
And March 4, 1992
The Supreme People's The Court,
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Justice
issued Waifa [19
92] No. 8 "About Enforcement
Notice on the Service of Civil or Commercial
Judicial Documents and Judicial
Convention on Foreign Documents
Related Procedures to Foreign Countries
Not consistent with 10
Notice of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues in the Trial of Foreign Maritime Diplomacy
Transport Accident Cases
1983 December 30 (83)
Fa Jing Zi No. 8
Has been passed by the National People's Congress on December 25, 1999
>
The "Special Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China on Maritime Litigation
was passed and promulgated to replace 11
The Supreme People's Notice of the Court on Several Issues Concerning the Conduct of Patent Trial Work
Law of February 16, 1985
(Jing) [1985] No. 3
The "People's Republic of China" has been revised and
published by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on August 25, 2000
***
The Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China and the National People’s Congress revised and promulgated it on March 14, 1997
The Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China
replaces 12
The Supreme People's Court's decision on whether counselors of embassies abroad can serve their country as diplomatic representatives
Nationals hiring Chinese lawyers to represent them in civil litigation in China
Approval on litigation issues
March 28, 1985
(1985) Minta Zi No. 5
Has been issued by the Supreme People's Court on July 14, 1992
Fafa [1992] No. 22 "
The Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Certain Issues Concerning the Application of the Civil Procedure Law
" instead of 13
The Supreme People's Court The court's reply on the question of whether it is permissible for a foreign party to entrust a foreigner residing in my country or a member of the country's consulate to be a litigation agent
Article
June 8, 1985 (85)
Minta Zi No. 3
Has been dated July 14, 1992
The Supreme People's Court issued the "Fafa [1992] No. 22"
The Supreme People's Court's Notice on the Applicability of the Civil Procedure Law
If
Opinions on Qian Issues" instead of 14
The Supreme People's Court's Approval on How to Calculate Trademark Infringement
The amount of loss compensation and the period of infringement
Fu
Law of November 6, 1985
Jing Fu (1985) No. 53
and October 27, 2001
The "Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China" as amended and promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress
is inconsistent with 15
p>Notice of the Supreme People's Court on the geographical jurisdiction of patent infringement dispute cases
Published on June 29, 1987
Has been adopted in 2001 On June 22, 2001
The Supreme People's Court issued the Law Interpretation [2001] No. 21
The Supreme People's Court on Trials
Handling patent dispute cases
The judicial interpretation of "Applicable
Several Provisions on Legal Issues
" replaces 16
Supreme People's Court on Copyright (Copyright)
Sponsored Reply to whether the work owned by the unit infringes upon personal copyright
December 31, 1987 [
1987] Minta Zi No. 24
The "National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China" has been revised and promulgated on October 27, 2001
The Copyright Law of the People's Republic of China
Replaces 17
The Supreme People's Court's application to the People's Court for Chinese parties in divorce judgments
of foreign courts
Reply to the issue of recognizing the validity of the divorce judgment of the foreign court
Law of August 28, 1990
Minfuzi [1990] No. 12
Promulgated by the Supreme People's Court on August 13, 1991
Law (Civil) Law (1991)
21 "Regulations of the Supreme People's Court on Procedural Issues Concerning Applications by Chinese Citizens for Recognition of Divorce Judgments of Foreign Courts
" No.
Replaced 18
Answers to Several Questions Concerning the Trial of Patent Dispute Cases
by the Supreme People's Court
Issued on February 9, 1992
[1992] No. 3
Has been issued by the Supreme People's Court on June 22, 2001
Fa Interpretation [2001] No. 21
The Judicial Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Provisions on the Application of Legal Issues in the Trial of
Patent Dispute Cases
replaces 19
Notice of the Supreme People's Court on the Study, Publicity and Implementation of
The Maritime and Commercial Law of the People's Republic of China
November 18, 1992
Fafa [1992] No. 37
The applicable period has expired,
it has actually expired
20
Supreme People's Court Reply on whether the economic loss caused by the drop in the price of the goods should be compensated for the overdue delivery of waterway goods
December 7, 1995 [
1995〕Jiaota Zi No. 7
The original basis of the "Chinese People
Republic of China and the National Economic Cooperation
The relevant provisions of the same Law and the "Rules for the Transport of Goods by Waterway
and the "Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Contract for the Transport of Goods by Waterway
The judicial interpretation made
is no longer
applicable