oh my Lord! Oh, my God! Because God is the greatest master, let alone the slavish side of Chinese history, I feel the slavishness of Europeans more strongly. A knight is actually a soldier, a soldier

oh my Lord! Oh, my God! Because God is the greatest master, let alone the slavish side of Chinese history, I feel the slavishness of Europeans more strongly. A knight is actually a soldier, a soldier with a horse, right? Horses are property, and a soldier with a horse is a soldier with property. Who are these people? They must be noble. They must be nobles. The other ones are free people and subordinate people. From the point of view of the nobles, these two types of people are both inferior. The difference is that free people have property and have the possibility of becoming nobles, while enslaved people are other people's property. In ancient Europe, kings basically had no personal ministers because they did not pay attention to culture. More than 90% of the nobles were illiterate, so what should they do when reading documents? Generally, there are secretaries who are ghostwriters. These secretaries belong to the subordinates, um, senior subordinates. Nobles have their own territory, and in their territory, they are all Lords. Nobles who have lost their territory can become knights as long as they have a horse with a document or seal proving their noble status. ···So I say that their nobles over 90 years old are illiterate. Because the first thing to pay attention to as a European noble is that you must be able to fight. If your territory is ruined, you still have the possibility of becoming a knight. And as a national recruitment war, nobles must go to the battlefield. The most inherited civilization in ancient Europe was the Greek civilization, and this civilization had very high requirements for being a soldier. Before leggings were used in the military, soldiers must be composed of people of the same race who were closely related by blood. The cavalry is rich, while the infantry is proletarian. Regardless of whether they have money or not, they provide their own weapons. They must be of the same race before they can go to the battlefield together. So, Europe eventually followed these traditions and deepened them. Why do nobles need to be cavalry? First of all, the king must be riding a horse, right? So the cavalry of the nobles are the people closest to the king. These people are also closest to the king. The king is not willing to give his back to the people under any circumstances, or is it? It is more reliable to leave it to the nobles you recognize. Human nature, human nature. Regarding what prince’s wedding or coronation ceremony you saw recently, when did these appear? It didn't appear until the rise of Catholicism, because a group of illiterate people could never accomplish anything big, so Christians who knew the culture found an opportunity. They formulated etiquette and beliefs to unify this group of illiterate people. You know the advantage of having knowledge is People who use their brains can ultimately achieve the results achieved by people who have no brains without spending much effort. From the perspective of cultural promotion, Christians have arranged various etiquette and norms for the kings, and then they have become the domestic systems and norms for the kings. The various European titles that appeared later are basically related to this. After talking so much, maybe you still don’t understand something, so let’s simplify it in the end. The knighthood thing was designed by civilized and smart people, and the various foreign titles you see now are the result of us translating foreign texts into domestic texts, damn the translation. In the end, because our knowledge was incomplete, we thought it was an invention of some other country. Heck, our ancestors were pretty amazing when it came to playing with their brains. That’s all for the above. I may have said too much, and you may still be confused. If you are interested, you can discuss it in private.