Why did Lenovo vote for Qualcomm? Don't listen to his nonsense Lenovo is already a running dog of America. In the short code scheme of data code, Huawei lost the right to speak short codes by one vote of 23: 24, while Lenovo and Motorola acquired four votes, but all its long codes were voted for Qualcomm, and the short codes abstained.
In other words, in the most critical 5G data code, Huawei lost both the long code and the short code, and Qualcomm monopolized the 5G data code, which was partly attributed to Lenovo. It is also the only local enterprise in China that voted for Qualcomm. The core patent of wireless communication in the 2G/3G era has always been controlled by Qualcomm, and Qualcomm once again relies on LDPC to master the right to speak in the 5G era. Huawei used Polar to fight for not only patents, but also the right to speak, to get rid of the image of followers of China company. However, this time, I still lost the right to speak the data code. In the past few days, Lenovo has been "dispelling rumors" on the Internet, shouting that they voted for Huawei. What does this mean? That's because there are channel control codes besides data codes. In terms of control code, Huawei polar scheme has an overwhelming advantage. At the 87th meeting of 3GPP, more than 50 enterprises voted for Huawei. For this undisputed result, Lenovo naturally voted for Huawei. This thing sounds complicated, but it's actually very simple. For example, Lenovo stabbed Huawei in the crucial headwind situation, but when Huawei was crushed by the downwind situation, Lenovo mistakenly waved the flag to Huawei. In fact, the control code result has been determined, and it doesn't matter whether he supports it or not. Lenovo's so-called "rumor" did not dare to mention Lenovo's vote at the 86th meeting, nor did it dare to mention the data code vote at the 87th meeting. They only dare to say things with meaningless control code votes, confuse right and wrong, and reverse black and white. Huawei's generosity does not mean that we serious netizens don't care. In China, the greatest patriotism of enterprises is to create excellent products, sincerely serve domestic consumers, let products go out, have core competitiveness, make more profits and pay more taxes. Which one did Lenovo do? In the core technology, Lenovo has always been subject to people, and it is impossible to make its own characteristic products. At best, it is OEM. If Microsoft hadn't made surface to force notebook manufacturers to change, Lenovo notebooks would still be silly and rough, and continue to use the 1366X768 slag screen that has remained unchanged for ten thousand years. At that time, under the leadership of Liu Chuanzhi, Lenovo took the route of "trade plus technology", but for more than 20 years, Lenovo's "technology" was simply invisible and remained at the stage of "trade" and "work", that is, assembling and selling goods. Lenovo has been implementing the strategy of "buy in buy", with PC and service acquiring IBM, and mobile phone acquiring MOTO…… ................................................................................................................................................ If you ask about the core technology, it's all others'. Lenovo doesn't even bother to do its own design. Anyway, government and enterprise purchase orders are large. Huawei's R&D investment in 20 17 has reached 90 billion, while Lenovo's R&D investment in ten years adds up to 4.4 billion, which is less than a fraction of others' investment in one year. Therefore, this is why Huawei can make mobile phones called P20 by consumers all over the world, why Huawei's P series and mate series can sell well all over the world, and why Huawei's communication equipment business can account for nearly half of the world. This is why Lenovo will always be a wimp. Their core technology is subject to people everywhere, and they can only be comprador enterprises, sucking the blood of domestic consumers and government procurement to please foreign markets, foreign capital and upstream suppliers. There are some things that people are really doing and the sky is watching. No matter how you pretend, the people's eyes are discerning. Why did Lenovo vote for the landlord in Qualcomm? Don't follow the trend! That's just a technical standard!
Judging from the results of three voting, Lenovo participated in three voting. The first voting (whether one or more coding standards) voted for the LDPC scheme led by Qualcomm, and the next two voting (data channel short code system and control channel system) all voted for the Polar scheme led by Huawei. At the end of the article, the voting shows that Lenovo chose LDPC. At that time, both Qualcomm and Huawei supported it, and everyone was not optimistic about Polar. When Chinese enterprises jointly supported Polar, they also supported Huawei. (* _ _ *) Hee hee ... What happened to Lenovo? On the Internet, it was said that its Qualcomm was the short code standard of 5G data channel in June+10/October, 5438. Lenovo voted for Qualcomm twice, resulting in Huawei losing one vote to Qualcomm.
If Huawei wins in June 5438+ 10, there will be no re-voting in June 5438+065438+ 10. On June 5438+065438+ 10, Lenovo voted for Huawei because of Qualcomm's sponsorship. Lenovo's statement only mentioned 1 1 month, not1month. Now, it is said that Lenovo has got the first launch of the 5G chip specially given to him by Qualcomm, which is half a year earlier than other domestic manufacturers. When Lenovo voted for Qualcomm's10.5g data channel short code standard, Lenovo voted for Qualcomm twice, resulting in Huawei losing one vote to Qualcomm.
If Huawei wins in June 5438+ 10, there will be no re-voting in June 5438+065438+ 10. On June 5438+065438+ 10, Lenovo voted for Huawei because of Qualcomm's sponsorship. Lenovo's statement only mentioned 1 1 month, not1month. Do Lenovo and Qualcomm also cooperate? 2065438+On February 18, 2006, Qualcomm announced that it had reached a new 3G and 4 Qualcomm patent licensing fee agreement with Lenovo. Neither party disclosed the financial terms of the transaction. Lenovo will pay Qualcomm a Qualcomm patent license fee to sell mobile phones based on 3G and 4G cellular network technologies in China. The new agreement covers Lenovo brand equipment and Motorola brand equipment sold in China.
Why did Lenovo vote for the landlord in Qualcomm, and why not?
That's just a technical standard. Great! We should consider it from the technical level! O(∩_∩)o ... Haha! ! ! Huawei (3) voted (1)