? ? The identity of 300,000 E-talents in Hangzhou means that high-level talents can enjoy corresponding policy treatment according to the Catalogue of High-level Talents in Hangzhou.
According to relevant media reports, on June 5438+05, some media reported that 300,000 yuan can "buy" the identity of Hangzhou E-type talents, thus enjoying preferential policies for talents such as direct settlement, rental subsidies and house purchase. Is there a gray industrial chain behind the identification of high-level talents in Hangzhou? On the afternoon of the same day, the Talent Office of Hangzhou Municipal Committee and the Hangzhou Municipal Bureau of Human Resources and Social Security responded to the relevant issues of the "talent intermediary", saying that they had urged the relevant urban areas to seriously investigate and verify and would deal with them in strict accordance with the law.
As the saying goes, if something goes wrong, there must be a demon. After seeing this news, my friends and I were surprised by the report that 300,000 yuan can "buy" the identity of talents. Little friends all know that since ancient times, Hangzhou is really a good place, which is very suitable for people to live in. "There is heaven above and Suzhou and Hangzhou below" is a long-standing reputation for Hangzhou. Once upon a time, the beauty of the West Lake was the scenic spot that people dreamed of, and choosing to work and buy a house in Hangzhou was the highest ideal realm for young people.
After years of attracting investment and strengthening the construction of business environment, Hangzhou has been selected as "the most attractive city in China in the eyes of foreign talents" for more than ten years. According to statistics, the net inflow of talents in Hangzhou has always been at the forefront of cities in China. In 20 15, in order to further introduce talents, Hangzhou issued Article 27 of the New Deal for Talents, which stipulated that imported high-level talents can enjoy corresponding preferential treatment according to the Catalogue of High-level Talents in Hangzhou after being classified and recognized by relevant departments. Qualified imported talents can enjoy preferential policies such as living and settling down, housing subsidies, schooling for their children, medical insurance and car license subsidies according to the corresponding categories. It can be said that the E-type talent policy introduced by Hangzhou to attract talents, including direct settlement, rental subsidy, house purchase, lottery tilt and other preferential contents, directly and indirectly attracted a large number of talents to stay in Hangzhou to start businesses, which enabled Hangzhou to gather talents, thus boosting the high-quality development of Hangzhou.
However, the E-type talent policy originally introduced by Hangzhou to attract talents has been used by some intermediaries and turned into its profit-seeking tool. A few days ago, according to media reports, some "talent agencies" in Hangzhou charged the so-called "agency fee" of more than 300,000 yuan, knowing that the applicants did not meet the talent requirements, and obtained the qualification of E-type talents in Hangzhou through illegal means, thus enjoying a number of preferential policies for talents, such as living and settling down, housing subsidies, children's enrollment, medical security, and subsidies for car purchase and licensing.
As the saying goes, the French open is long, sparse and not leaking. On August 15, the relevant departments of Hangzhou urged the implementing unit to investigate and verify the problems related to the identity of 300,000 yuan talents exposed by the media and deal with them according to regulations. The public security organ shall file a case for investigation of relevant enterprises involved in the case according to law.
In my opinion, if the relevant intermediary takes risks for the benefit, it will be severely punished by law. From the point of view that the E-type talent policy introduced by Hangzhou to attract talents has been used by some intermediaries and turned into a profit-seeking tool, it is revealed that there are indeed some omissions and deficiencies in the implementation of the policy by relevant departments. By analogy, rectification and implementation, plugging loopholes, investigating relevant offenders, and fairness and justice of policies are the issues that relevant departments should seriously consider and reflect on.