This is the "Examination Guidelines" for the rejection of preliminary examination of invention patent applications: "The application documents have obvious substantive defects. After the examiner issues a notice of examination opinion, the applicant states his opinions or makes modifications or if the application document has a formal defect for which the examiner has issued two correction notices and the applicant has stated his opinions or made corrections and still has not eliminated it, the examiner may make a decision to reject the application.
This is the "Examination Guidelines" for the rejection of the preliminary examination of utility model patent applications: "The application documents have obvious substantive defects. After the examiner issues a notice of examination opinion, the applicant states his opinions or makes modifications." If the application document still has not been eliminated, or if there is a formal defect in the application document, and the examiner has issued two correction notices for the defect, and if it is still not eliminated after the applicant has stated his opinions or made corrections, the examiner may make a decision to reject it. ”
It can be seen that even if it is a formal defect, if the current defect has not been overcome after two corrections, the examiner has the right to make a rejection decision. In this case, you can communicate with the examiner on the phone to find out what the specific problems are, or find an agency to help you look at it. Regardless, be cautious about this second opportunity to make amends.