? Generally speaking, there are several people who will say this. First of all, students who have worked hard to upgrade from college to undergraduate. They study hard in the university, and the focus of the specialty is to teach you some abilities that can be busy with a certain aspect, such as hotel management, secretarial work, tourism management and so on. Therefore, undergraduates may not be able to compete in these areas they focus on, of course, at the same level of effort. I think it's amazing that they can still work hard in a junior college or even a poor environment!
The second kind of people just don't know the situation. They don't understand that there is a big gap between undergraduate and junior college. As far as the study time is concerned, four years of undergraduate course can really improve their own quality and comprehensive ability, while three years of junior college may further widen the gap under the circumstances that the environment may not be very good. For those students who don't know the gap, it is actually very incorrect. I think the university may not pay attention to their study for three years.
The last person has money or a special family. They don't care about junior college, because the starting point is a little higher than ordinary people. They say that they are no worse than undergraduates, which is absolutely correct. For them, I think he may be better than an undergraduate if he doesn't work hard. I think it looks normal, and there is no need to compare anything deliberately. He is a rich second generation, and you may be the next rich second generation.