The chairman of Sanlu Milk Powder had his sentence reduced three times in a row, and his sentence was changed to 16 years. Why is this?

It is said that strong young people make a country strong. Every child is the foundation of society and the hope in people's lives.

During the epidemic, we saw teenagers with only 6-year-old children living at home because their families were working on the front line. We also saw the unfortunate teenagers after the hotel collapse in Quanzhou, Fujian. Looking back on the past, we can think of more It's negative information.

The poisoned tomato incident, the Sanlu milk powder incident, and the substandard vaccine incident have resulted in many children still suffering from illnesses, and many have lost their lives. Looking at it now, I don’t know how many people are still alert.

Recently, Tian Wenhua, the former chairman of Sanlu Milk Powder, had his sentence commuted three times...

In September 2008, the media revealed that 14 babies in Gansu suffered from kidney disease suspected of drinking "three kinds of milk powder" The news about Sanlu milk powder suddenly shocked the whole country...

Before the exposure, Sanlu milk powder had a brilliant miracle. It was one of the two major milk powder giants in the country at that time. Before being ordered bankrupt by the court, its production and sales ranked first in the country for 15 consecutive years. In August 2005, the "Sanlu" brand was rated as one of China's 500 most valuable brands by the World Brand Laboratory. In 2007, it was rated as the most market competitive brand by the Ministry of Commerce. The "Sanlu" trademark has been recognized as a "China Famous Trademark"; its products sell well in 31 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions across the country.

The greater the sales volume of Sanlu, the greater the negative energy generated after its exposure. In early 2008, Sanlu Group began to receive complaints from consumers that the dairy products it produced contained substances harmful to the human body. In mid-September 2008, a large number of consumers across the country began to suffer side effects from consuming dairy products produced by Sanlu.

On June 28, 2008, the First Hospital of the People's Liberation Army in Lanzhou City admitted the first infant suffering from "kidney stones". According to parents, the child had been eating Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province since birth. Sanlu infant milk powder produced by Sanlu Group. In mid-July, after the Gansu Provincial Health Department received a report of infant urinary stone cases in the hospital, it immediately launched an investigation and reported it to the Ministry of Health. In just over two months, the number of infants admitted to the hospital quickly expanded to 14. As of September 11, 2008, Gansu had reported 59 cases and 1 death.

Later it was found that the milk powder contained "melamine", which caused more than 200,000 infants and young children to suffer from stones. People across the country were angry, and the country directly sealed it! Its chairman, Tian Wenhua, was directly arrested and eventually sentenced to life imprisonment. Sanlu Group also declared bankruptcy in 2009.

After this incident, Tian Wenhua, chairman of Sanlu Group, was sentenced to life imprisonment. However, after serving his sentence in 2009, Tian Wenhua received three commutations. The fact that the sentences were commuted aroused great reaction.

The first time was in 2011 when the sentence was reduced from life to 19 years in prison, the second time was in 2014 when the sentence was reduced by one year and nine months, and the third time in 2016 the sentence was reduced by one and a half years.

In the end, the court ruled that the prison sentence for criminal Tian Wenhua was reduced to one year and six months, and the deprivation of political rights remained unchanged for six years. The sentence is from November 4, 2011 to August 3, 2027.

Perhaps Tian Wenhua’s decision was not the main reason in the Sanlu incident, but it is an indisputable fact that hundreds of thousands of children lost their future. According to the facts, the reduced sentence was due to active reform during the sentence. Many parents cannot accept this.

Between human rights and greed, a small number of people will still lose the rationality to choose. If the term is changed from indefinite period to fixed term, and the deprivation of political rights is changed from lifetime to six years, will it be forgiven by many parents? Under this judgment, he was released on medical parole.

What do readers think about this?