What is Matthew Effect and its origin
Matthew effect Brief introduction Matthew effect refers to a phenomenon that the better, the worse, the more and the less.
The name comes from a fable in Matthew. In 1968, Robert K. Merton, an American researcher in the history of science, put forward this term to summarize a social psychological phenomenon: "Compared with those unknown researchers, famous scientists usually get more prestige, even if their achievements are similar. Similarly, on the same project, reputation is usually given to those already famous researchers. For example, an award is almost always given to the most senior researcher, even if all the work is done by a graduate student.
this term was later borrowed by economists, reflecting the phenomenon of unfair income distribution in economics where the poor are poorer, the rich are richer and the winner takes all. This term is often used in social psychology.
Matthew effect originates from Matthew effect, which refers to a phenomenon that the better, the worse, the more and the less. Robert K. Merton, an American researcher in the history of science, summed up the "Matthew effect" as follows: once any individual, group or region has achieved success and progress in a certain aspect (such as money, reputation, status, etc.), it will have an accumulated advantage and will have more opportunities to achieve greater success and progress.
Its name comes from a fable in the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament. Chapter 25 of the Gospel of Matthew in the Bible consists of these words: "If you have anything, give it to him to be redundant; No, even what he has will be taken away. "
In 1973, Morton, an American researcher in the history of science, summed up a social and psychological phenomenon with this sentence: "More and more honors are given to the scientific contributions made by scientists with considerable reputation, while those unknown scientists are not recognized for their achievements." Morton named this social psychological phenomenon "Matthew effect".
The parable of Matthew 25 in the New Testament (NIV translation): "The kingdom of heaven is like a man who wants to go abroad, so he calls his servants and gives them his possessions. Give each man money according to his ability.
one gave five thousand, one gave two thousand and one gave one thousand. And went abroad.
the one who received 5, immediately went into business and earned another 5,. In the same way, he who received two thousand earned another two thousand.
but the one who received the thousand went to dig up the ground and buried his master's money. After a long time, the owners of those servants came and settled accounts with them.
the one who received five thousand pieces of silver came with the other five, saying, Lord, you gave me five thousand pieces of silver, and behold, I have earned another five thousand pieces. The master said, well, you good and faithful servant.
you are loyal to a few things, and I put many things in your charge. You can come in and enjoy your master's happiness.
the one who received the two thousand also came and said, Lord, you gave me two thousand pieces of silver, and behold, I have earned another two thousand pieces. The master said, well, you good and faithful servant.
you are loyal to a few things, and I put many things in your charge. You can come in and enjoy your master's happiness.
the one who received the 1 also came and said, Lord, I know that you have the heart to reap where you have not sown and gather where you have not scattered. I'm afraid, go and bury your 1 silver in the ground.
look, your original silver is here. The master replied, you evil and lazy servant, you know that I have to reap where I didn't sow and gather where I didn't scatter.
just give my money to the money changer, and when I come, I can get it back with interest. Take this thousand from him and give it to him who has ten thousand.
because whatever you have, you should give it to him, so that he can have more. If you don't have it, you have to take it away from him.
There is such a story in the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament. Before a king went on a long journey, he gave each of the three servants a piece of silver and told them, "Go and do business, and come to see me when I come back."
When the king came back, the first servant said, "Master, I have earned 1 pieces of silver you gave me." So the king rewarded him with 1 cities.
The second servant reported, "Master, I have earned 5 pieces of silver you gave me." So the king rewarded him with five cities.
The third servant reported, "Master, I kept the silver ingot you gave me wrapped in a towel, and I never took it out for fear of losing it." So the king ordered the third servant's silver ingot to be awarded to the first servant, and said, "Whatever is less, even what he has should be taken away."
If there is more, give it to him, and tell him that the more the better. " Matthew effect expansion In 1968, Robert K. Merton, an American researcher in the history of science, put forward this term to summarize a social psychological phenomenon: "Compared with those unknown researchers, famous scientists usually get more prestige, even if their achievements are similar. Similarly, on the same project, reputation is usually given to those already famous researchers. As a result, the more research results, the more nicknames they have, and the more famous people have more achievements.
。” This term was later borrowed by economists, reflecting the economic phenomenon that the poorer the poor, the richer the rich, and the winner takes all.
Matthew Effect, that is, a widespread phenomenon in society, especially in the economic field: the strong are always strong, while the weak are always weak, in other words, the winner takes all. In 1968, Robert K. Merton, an American researcher in the history of science, first used the "Matthew effect" to describe this social and psychological phenomenon.
Merton first used this sentence to sum up a social and psychological effect-"More and more honors are given to the contributions made by scientists with considerable reputation, while those scientists who are not yet famous refuse to recognize their achievements." This is the Matthew effect.
Social psychologists believe that "Matthew effect" is a social psychological phenomenon with both negative and positive effects. Its negative effects are as follows: celebrities and unknown people have achieved the same results. The former is often praised by superiors, interviewed by reporters, consulted and visited one after another, and various laurels are floating one after another. As a result, some of them often take credit for their lack of sober self-awareness and rational attitude, and stumble on the road of life; The latter, on the other hand, is neglected, and even suffers criticism and jealousy.
"Matthew Effect" Composition Intention Angle
In Chapter 25 of the Gospel of Matthew in the Bible and the New Testament, it is said: "If there is anything, give it to him to be redundant; No, even what he has should be taken away. "It tells a story: Before a king went on a long trip, he gave three servants a piece of silver and ordered," Go to business and come to see me when I come back. "When the king came back, the first servant said," Master, I have earned 1 pieces of silver you gave me. "So the king rewarded him. I have earned five pounds. "So, the king rewarded him with five cities. The third servant reported," Master, I always wrapped the one pound of silver you gave me in a handkerchief for fear of losing it. "So, the king ordered that the third servant's one pound of silver be rewarded to the first servant, saying," Whatever is less, even what he has, should be taken away. Anything that is more. The original wealth of the three servants was the same, but in the end it was very different. There were two stages in the formation of the final gap. The first stage was that before the king came back, they went to do business separately, and the gap was caused by their own factors (such as hard work). In the second stage, when the king came back, the king rewarded and punished them. At this time, the gap was caused by external reasons. However, it is worth noting that the influence of external factors in the second stage was based on the results of the first stage, and the results of the first stage depended on their own factors, so a little difference in their own factors at the beginning led to the later differences. Later, the differences were further amplified and the chain conduction led to the Matthew effect. This is the Matthew effect. It was formally put forward by Robert K.Merton, an American researcher in the history of science, in 1973. "More and more honors are given to the scientific contributions made by scientists with considerable reputation, but their achievements are not recognized to those unknown scientists." Morton summed up a common phenomenon in today's society with this sentence: the better, the worse, the more, the less. Matthew effect also reflects a phenomenon that the poor get poorer, the rich get richer, and the winner takes all. For Morton's statement, this example will better explain its significance: in the same project, a reputation and award are always awarded to the most senior researcher, even if all the work is done by a graduate student. Some practical examples in life can also illustrate Matthew effect, for example, the higher the land price is, the more the house is robbed. The more you rob, the more you rise. In the stock market frenzy, the bookmakers always earn the most, and the retail investors always lose the most. Therefore, without adjustment, the money of the general public will gather in the hands of a few people through this form, further aggravating the polarization between the rich and the poor. The Matthew effect can be summarized as follows: "Once any individual, group or region has achieved success and progress in a certain aspect (such as money, reputation, status, etc.), There will be more opportunities to achieve greater success and progress. "Matthew effect is the accumulation of advantages for leaders. When you have achieved certain success, it will be easier to achieve greater success. The strong will always be stronger, but the weak will be weaker. Natural selection, survival of the fittest, the strong will have more opportunities to achieve greater success and progress with the accumulation of advantages. So if you don't want to be defeated in any field, You will become a leader in this field, and continue to expand. When you become a leader, even if your return on investment is the same, you can get more benefits than your weak peers more easily. Matthew effect not only explains the phenomenon, but also has negative and positive effects. When celebrities become more famous, they will cause some celebrities to lose their minds, take credit for themselves and stumble on the road of life, which is a negative effect. The positive effect is that Matthew effect constantly urges the anonymous to work hard. However, with the influence of fame, more expectations are placed on Liu Xiang, which leads to Liu Xiang's ups and downs in track and field. Matthew effect tells us that if we want to maintain an advantage in a certain field, we must expand it rapidly. Moreover, when there is a strong opponent in the target field, we must find another way to find out the weaknesses of the opponent and our own advantages.
what is Matthew effect? What exactly does it mean? Details?
Matthew Effect refers to a phenomenon that the better, the worse, the more and the less. The name comes from a fable in the Gospel of Matthew in the Bible.
in 1968, Robert K. Merton, an American researcher in the history of science, put forward this term to summarize a social and psychological phenomenon: "Compared with those unknown researchers, famous scientists usually get more prestige, even if their achievements are similar. Similarly, on the same project, reputation is usually given to those already famous researchers. For example, an award is almost always given to the most senior researcher, even if all the work is done.
Robert Morton summed up the Matthew effect as follows: once any individual, group or region has achieved success and progress in a certain aspect (such as money, reputation, status, etc.), it will produce an accumulated advantage and have more opportunities to achieve greater success and progress.
this term was later borrowed by economists, reflecting the phenomenon of unfair income distribution in economics where the poor are poorer, the rich are richer and the winner takes all.
what are the meanings of "Matthew effect" and "broken window effect" in psychology?
Matthew effect refers to the phenomenon that the stronger the strong, the weaker the weak, which is widely used in many fields, such as social psychology, education, finance and science. Its name comes from a fable in the New Testament Matthew Gospel: "Whoever has it, give it to him to be redundant; No, even what he owns should be taken away. "Matthew effect is contrary to the principle of balance, and similar to the 28 th Rule. It is a very important natural law. The theory of" broken window effect "means that if someone breaks the window glass of a building and this window is not repaired in time, others may be indulged by some hints to break more windows." Frederick? Bastiat is called "the father of broken windows" because of the first verse in an article "Visible and Invisible".
how to use Matthew effect? Can be combined with personal reality to talk about
Matthew Effect, which refers to a phenomenon that the better, the worse, the more, the less. A fable in the Gospel of Matthew. In 1968, Robert K.Merton, an American researcher in the history of science, put forward this term to summarize a social and psychological phenomenon: "Compared with those unknown researchers, famous scientists usually get more prestige, even if their achievements are similar. Similarly, on the same project, reputation is usually given to those already famous researchers, for example, An award is almost always awarded to the most senior researcher, even if all the work is done by a graduate student. "This term was later borrowed by economists, reflecting the phenomenon of unfair income distribution in economics where the poor get poorer, the rich get richer and the winner takes all. The Matthew effect of brand capital means that the greater the brand awareness of products or services of an industry, the higher the brand value and the more loyal consumers it has. It is bound to occupy a larger market share. On the contrary, the smaller the brand awareness of a certain industry or industry's products or services, the lower the brand value, the fewer its loyal consumers, which will inevitably lead to a smaller market share, which will lead to a decrease in profits and be eliminated by the market. The market that it gives way to will be replaced by products or services with high brand awareness. Matthew effect is a common market phenomenon in the field of brand capital: the strong will remain strong, the weak will remain weak, or Winners take all ... Brand capital Matthew effect Successful cases The core value of brand capital is standards and technology, and the derived value is consumer recognition and brand marketing.