I must correct what I said to you:
1, "1, except Aurora, the domestic copier industry is divided by Xerox, Canon, Sharp, Kyocera, Minolta, Ricoh and Toshiba." -Aurora is not made in China! Before 2003, Aurora mainly represented Ricoh, and for some time also represented Murata brand multifunction machines 1600 and 2500. From 2003 to the end of 2005, the brand Kyocera Meida copier, and from 2006 to now, the brand Minolta. The photocopiers of Aurora brand are branded from beginning to end (the so-called OEM means to let others produce photocopiers and make their own brands), so it is unscientific to say that Aurora is made in China.
What needs to be added is that more than 90% of the copier industry is Japanese. The only brand: Ossie, it's Dutch.
2. The fundamental reason for this situation is that China lacks R&D capability, especially precision electronics, laser imaging and other technologies. If we want to start now, we will encounter patent monopoly disputes in the Japanese copier industry. Even if you made this technology yourself, it is likely that Japan used this technology and applied for a patent five years ago. It's hard for China to do it by itself, unless you have strong technology research and development, and you can jump out of the technical monopoly of the current copier industry. Production capacity and technology are not fundamental issues, but mainly technology research and development and patent monopoly! Therefore, I think that no matter how big the investment of state-owned enterprises is, there is little hope of success.
If you want to do this industry, you will definitely get the support of the state. Including capital and technology research and development. At present, when the government purchases, all photocopiers must be "made in China" to be shortlisted, and imported photocopiers cannot be shortlisted. When the State Council Press Office purchased a Minolta high-end color copier in 2005, there were no technicians in China who could debug and install it. The Japanese thought they could go in and install it, but they were blown out. There is no choice but to let China people in and shout for directions outside.
-
I don't know if you are doing technology research and development or something else. If you are interested in this copier and want to do your own research and development, and use it as an entrance to break this pattern, I admire it and look forward to it. A copier involves a wide range of scientific fields: optics, microelectronics, machinery, and even voice recognition control. Almost the same as the technology of making robots. If you want to do this, I will give you some research directions that have not been realized in this industry:
1, voice control. Using language to control the copying operation of the machine itself, it is best to customize the voice control input (similar to the voice dialing function of moto mobile phone).
2. I hope the image input mode can be changed to the shutter mode of the digital camera.
3. I hope to change the imaging mode to liquid quick-drying imaging, instead of the current laser exposure mode of photosensitive drum, but not the liquid imaging after plate making by rapid printing machine. That's the point. If this breakthrough is made, it will be of great significance to this industry. The design direction must consider environmental protection, recycling, cost, efficiency and stability.